Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 310 | 373.50 | -63.50 | #27 |
| Total Yards | 5002 | 5,635.56 | -633.56 | #25 |
| Yds / Play | 5.30 | 5.59 | -0.29 | #26 |
| 1st Downs | 289 | 326.94 | -37.94 | #26 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 21.75 | -3.75 | #7 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 8.66 | -2.66 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | 5.76 | 66.06 | -60.30 | #25 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 303 | 373.50 | -70.50 | #3 |
| Total Yards | 5334 | 5,635.56 | -301.56 | #8 |
| Yds / Play | 5.30 | 5.59 | -0.29 | #6 |
| 1st Downs | 298 | 326.94 | -28.94 | #5 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 21.75 | -4.75 | #27 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 8.66 | -2.66 | #27 |
| EXP Pts | -24.17 | -66.06 | +41.89 | #8 |
Scoring Composition
Where Tennessee Titans's points come from. Total = 310 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 166 | 179.38 | -13.38 | #32 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.90 | 5.82 | +0.08 | #15 |
| Yds / Drive | 30 | 31.44 | -1.44 | #23 |
| Points / Drive | 1.82 | 2.00 | -0.18 | #22 |
| Score % | 34.90 | 36.65 | -1.75 | #22 |
| Turnover % | 10.20 | 11.71 | -1.51 | #11 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 456 | 414.75 | +41.25 | #9 |
| Rush Yds | 2027 | 1,831.28 | +195.72 | #6 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.42 | -0.02 | #16 |
| Rush TD | 15 | 13.72 | +1.28 | #14 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 2.14 | -2.64 | +4.78 | #11 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 437 | 552.22 | -115.22 | #31 |
| Pass Cmp | 293 | 358.19 | -65.19 | #28 |
| Cmp % | 67 | 64.79 | +2.21 | #12 |
| Pass Yds | 2975 | 3,804.28 | -829.28 | #29 |
| Yds / Att | 6.80 | 6.86 | -0.06 | #18 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.20 | 10.59 | -0.39 | #20 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.30 | 6.75 | -0.45 | #23 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.70 | 6.30 | -0.60 | #24 |
| Pass TD | 16 | 26.47 | -10.47 | #28 |
| TD % | 3.70 | 4.79 | -1.09 | #24 |
| Pass Int | 12 | 13.09 | -1.09 | #12 |
| Int % | 2.70 | 2.39 | +0.31 | #22 |
| Sack % | 9.70 | 6.88 | +2.83 | #29 |
| Pass Rating | 87.10 | 90.66 | -3.56 | #21 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 6.06 | 74.79 | -68.73 | #26 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 205 | 201.63 | +3.38 | #15 |
| 3rd Down Made | 82 | 78.88 | +3.13 | #14 |
| 4th Down Att | 12 | 16.84 | -4.84 | #30 |
| 4th Down Made | 7 | 9.38 | -2.38 | #29 |
| Red Zone Att | 47 | 51.22 | -4.22 | #23 |
| Red Zone Scores | 25 | 30.25 | -5.25 | #23 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 172 | 179.38 | -7.38 | #8 |
| Plays / Drive | 6 | 5.80 | +0.20 | #25 |
| Yds / Drive | 30.90 | 31.41 | -0.51 | #12 |
| Points / Drive | 1.72 | 2.00 | -0.28 | #4 |
| Score % | 33.10 | 36.52 | -3.42 | #5 |
| Turnover % | 9.90 | 11.76 | -1.86 | #22 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 429 | 414.75 | +14.25 | #19 |
| Rush Yds | 1863 | 1,831.28 | +31.72 | #18 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.30 | 4.41 | -0.11 | #11 |
| Rush TD | 9 | 13.72 | -4.72 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 9.27 | 2.64 | +6.63 | #13 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 533 | 552.22 | -19.22 | #23 |
| Pass Cmp | 337 | 358.19 | -21.19 | #8 |
| Cmp % | 63.20 | 64.88 | -1.68 | #9 |
| Pass Yds | 3471 | 3,804.28 | -333.28 | #6 |
| Yds / Att | 7 | 7.38 | -0.38 | #6 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11 | 11.38 | -0.38 | #8 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.80 | 7.28 | -0.48 | #8 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.90 | 6.33 | -0.43 | #8 |
| Pass TD | 21 | 26.47 | -5.47 | #3 |
| TD % | 3.90 | 4.82 | -0.92 | #7 |
| Pass Int | 11 | 13.09 | -2.09 | #24 |
| Int % | 2.10 | 2.38 | -0.28 | #24 |
| Sack % | 6.80 | 6.75 | +0.05 | #17 |
| Pass Rating | 88.40 | 93.10 | -4.70 | #8 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -38.26 | -74.79 | +36.53 | #8 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 205 | 201.63 | +3.38 | #20 |
| 3rd Down Made | 75 | 78.88 | -3.88 | #12 |
| 4th Down Att | 20 | 16.84 | +3.16 | #25 |
| 4th Down Made | 11 | 9.38 | +1.63 | #22 |
| Red Zone Att | 47 | 51.22 | -4.22 | #7 |
| Red Zone Scores | 21 | 30.25 | -9.25 | #2 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for TEN 2018. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — TEN 2018
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% |
| 30-39 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% |
| 50-59 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for TEN 2018.
Pressure & Tackles — TEN 2018
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for TEN 2018. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — TEN 2018
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for TEN 2018 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — TEN 2018
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for TEN 2018. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — TEN 2018
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Year-over-year not available — 2017 stats missing.
Last game — Week 17, 2018
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for TEN 2018.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. TEN has 16 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 16 | 9-7 | 8-8 | 50.0% | 8-8 | 50.0% | +0.4 | +1.0 | 24 | +30.0 |
| Home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 50.0% | 5-3 | 62.5% | +3.4 | +2.3 | 24 | +30.0 |
| Away | 8 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 37.5% | -2.5 | -0.4 | 17 | +18.5 |
| As favorite | 6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 33.3% | 4-2 | 66.7% | +7.2 | +0.8 | 21 | +15.5 |
| As underdog | 10 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 60.0% | 4-6 | 40.0% | -3.6 | +1.1 | 24 | +30.0 |
| Division games | 6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 3-3 | 50.0% | -5.7 | -2.6 | 21 | +15.5 |
| Non-division | 10 | 6-4 | 5-5 | 50.0% | 5-5 | 50.0% | +4.1 | +3.1 | 24 | +30.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 40.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | -7.2 | -6.4 | 17 | +14.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +10.0 | +4.2 | 21 | +15.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | — | 2-0 | — | +6.5 | -5.0 | 9 | -3.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 6 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 3-3 | 50.0% | +1.2 | +6.0 | 24 | +30.0 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +3.0 | +13.0 | 3 | +13.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2018. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| HOU | Houston Texans | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -7.0 | -3.5 |
| JAX | Jacksonville Jaguars | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +12.0 | +14.2 |
| IND | Indianapolis Colts | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | -22.0 | -18.5 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -7.0 | -8.0 |
| PHI | Philadelphia Eagles | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +3.0 | +6.0 |
| BUF | Buffalo Bills | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -1.0 | -7.0 |
| BAL | Baltimore Ravens | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -21.0 | -18.5 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | -1.0 | +5.5 |
| DAL | Dallas Cowboys | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +14.0 | +18.5 |
| NE | New England Patriots | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +24.0 | +30.0 |
| NYJ | New York Jets | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +4.0 | -6.5 |
| NYG | New York Giants | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +17.0 | +14.5 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +9.0 | -3.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Oct | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 33% |
| Nov | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Dec | 5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 40% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Sat | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Sun | 12 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 4-8 | 50% |
| Mon | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 8 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 3-5 | 62% |
| Second half (W10+) | 8 | 5-3 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 38% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 11 | 7-4 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 55% |
| Turf | 5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 40% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| Same conference | 6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 33% |
| Inter-conference | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 75% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cool (40-59°F) | 5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 25% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Indoor | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 9 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 56% |
| Indoor | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 2 |
| O/U | O | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 4 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 3 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 3 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 3 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 9 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 56% |
| After a loss | 6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 6 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 33% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| vs winning opp. | 7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 57% |
| vs losing opp. | 7 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 57% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 13 | 8-5 | 7-6 | 6-7 | 54% |
| Retractable (closed) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 7 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 43% |
| International | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 50% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 10 | 6-4 | 5-5 | 3-7 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC South
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Texans (HOU) | 11-5 | 0.471 #29 | 25.1 | 19.8 | 88.42 | 16.79 |
| Indianapolis Colts (IND) | 10-6 | 0.465 #31 | 27.1 | 21.5 | 131.06 | -25.82 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars (JAX) | 5-11 | 0.549 #1 | 15.3 | 19.8 | -95.67 | -3.26 |
| Tennessee Titans (TEN) | 9-7 | 0.520 #9 | 19.4 | 18.9 | 5.76 | -24.17 |
Insights
A look at how the 2018 Tennessee Titans ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yac over expected allowed (1st of 32), offensive avg wr separation (2nd of 32), and defensive avg yac allowed (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (29th of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (29th of 32), and offensive sack rate allowed (29th of 32).