The insights diary
Every insight the site has written, newest first — what each matchup looked like beforehand, what happened after, and how the numbers moved.
This season, as it happened
- Biggest mismatch: CHI's offense (1st) against PHI's defense (T-23rd) in rushing touchdowns.
The mismatch
- CHI's offense ranks 1st in rushing touchdowns; PHI's defense ranks T-23rd against it.
- CHI's offense ranks 4th in expected points added rushing; PHI's defense ranks 27th against it.
- PHI's offense ranks 12th in yards per completion; CHI's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- CHI's offense ranks T-3rd in rushing first downs; PHI's defense ranks T-22nd against it.
- PHI's offense ranks 11th in yards per pass attempt; CHI's defense ranks 28th against it.
- PHI's offense ranks 13th in yards per play; CHI's defense ranks 30th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: PHI (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at CHI (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: PHI leads CHI 2–1 in games since 2019.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Jalen Hurts for PHI, Tyson Bagent for CHI.
- Biggest mismatch: LAR's offense (6th) against DEN's defense (30th) in yards per carry.
The mismatch
- LAR's offense ranks 6th in yards per carry; DEN's defense ranks 30th against it.
- LAR's offense ranks 3rd in yards per play; DEN's defense ranks 21st against it.
- LAR's offense ranks 3rd in sack rate (taken); DEN's defense ranks 18th against it.
- DEN's offense ranks 16th in sack rate (taken); LAR's defense ranks 30th against it.
- DEN's offense ranks T-12th in fumbles lost; LAR's defense ranks T-21st against it.
- DEN's offense ranks 15th in expected points added rushing; LAR's defense ranks 22nd against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: LAR (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak at DEN (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: LAR leads DEN 2–0 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Matthew Stafford for LAR, Bo Nix for DEN.
- DEN enters on 7 days rest to LAR's 6.
- Biggest mismatch: LV's offense (6th) against NO's defense (21st) in sack rate (taken).
The mismatch
- LV's offense ranks 6th in sack rate (taken); NO's defense ranks 21st against it.
- LV's offense ranks 1st in touchdown rate per pass; NO's defense ranks 15th against it.
- NO's offense ranks 10th in yards after catch; LV's defense ranks 20th against it.
- LV's offense ranks 13th in red-zone scoring rate; NO's defense ranks 23rd against it.
- NO's offense ranks 19th in yards per completion; LV's defense ranks 27th against it.
- NO's offense ranks T-7th in rushing touchdowns; LV's defense ranks T-16th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: LV (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at NO (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: LV leads NO 2–1 in games since 2020.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Kirk Cousins for LV, Tyler Shough for NO.
- Biggest mismatch: BAL's offense (4th) against DAL's defense (32nd) in yards per drive.
The mismatch
- BAL's offense ranks 4th in yards per drive; DAL's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- BAL's offense ranks T-3rd in rushing first downs; DAL's defense ranks 31st against it.
- BAL's offense ranks 2nd in expected points added rushing; DAL's defense ranks 28th against it.
- DAL's offense ranks 3rd in red-zone scoring rate; BAL's defense ranks T-27th against it.
- DAL's offense ranks 3rd in completion rate; BAL's defense ranks 26th against it.
- DAL's offense ranks 1st in share of drives ending in a score; BAL's defense ranks 22nd against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: BAL (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak at DAL (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: BAL leads DAL 2–0 in games since 2020.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Lamar Jackson for BAL, Dak Prescott for DAL.
- Biggest mismatch: TB's offense (T-6th) against MIN's defense (29th) in yards after catch.
The mismatch
- TB's offense ranks T-6th in yards after catch; MIN's defense ranks 29th against it.
- MIN's offense ranks T-1st in fumbles lost; TB's defense ranks T-21st against it.
- MIN's offense ranks 6th in share of drives ending in a turnover; TB's defense ranks T-21st against it.
- TB's offense ranks 2nd in average drive start (yards to go); MIN's defense ranks 16th against it.
- MIN's offense ranks 14th in share of drives ending in a score; TB's defense ranks T-26th against it.
- TB's offense ranks 5th in yards per carry; MIN's defense ranks 12th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: MIN (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at TB (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: TB leads MIN 2–0 in games since 2020.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Kyler Murray for MIN, Baker Mayfield for TB.
- Biggest mismatch: SF's offense (3rd) against ARI's defense (26th) in touchdown rate per pass.
The mismatch
- SF's offense ranks 3rd in touchdown rate per pass; ARI's defense ranks 26th against it.
- SF's offense ranks 1st in net yards per pass attempt; ARI's defense ranks 23rd against it.
- SF's offense ranks 3rd in yards per pass attempt; ARI's defense ranks 25th against it.
- ARI's offense ranks 18th in average drive start (yards to go); SF's defense ranks 27th against it.
- ARI's offense ranks T-1st in fumbles lost; SF's defense ranks T-9th against it.
- ARI's offense ranks 7th in sack rate (taken); SF's defense ranks 15th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: ARI (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak at SF (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: SF leads ARI 9–7 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Jacoby Brissett for ARI, Brock Purdy for SF.
- Biggest mismatch: SEA's offense (7th) against WAS's defense (32nd) in touchdown rate per pass.
The mismatch
- SEA's offense ranks 7th in touchdown rate per pass; WAS's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- SEA's offense ranks T-1st in interception rate (thrown); WAS's defense ranks T-24th against it.
- SEA's offense ranks 4th in completion rate; WAS's defense ranks 27th against it.
- WAS's offense ranks T-1st in fourth-down conversion rate; SEA's defense ranks T-20th against it.
- WAS's offense ranks T-4th in red-zone scoring rate; SEA's defense ranks T-15th against it.
- WAS's offense ranks 2nd in sack rate (taken); SEA's defense ranks 13th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: SEA (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at WAS (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: SEA leads WAS 3–1 in games since 2020.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Drew Lock for SEA, Jayden Daniels for WAS.
- Biggest mismatch: PIT's offense (T-6th) against CIN's defense (30th) in yards after catch.
The mismatch
- PIT's offense ranks T-6th in yards after catch; CIN's defense ranks 30th against it.
- PIT's offense ranks 8th in interception rate (thrown); CIN's defense ranks T-24th against it.
- CIN's offense ranks T-1st in fumbles lost; PIT's defense ranks T-9th against it.
- CIN's offense ranks T-17th in rushing first downs; PIT's defense ranks T-26th against it.
- PIT's offense ranks T-20th in passing first downs; CIN's defense ranks T-27th against it.
- CIN's offense ranks 22nd in yards per completion; PIT's defense ranks 26th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: CIN (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at PIT (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: PIT leads CIN 10–6 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Joe Burrow for CIN, Aaron Rodgers for PIT.
- Biggest mismatch: TEN's offense (9th) against NYG's defense (30th) in red-zone scoring rate.
The mismatch
- TEN's offense ranks 9th in red-zone scoring rate; NYG's defense ranks 30th against it.
- TEN's offense ranks 9th in yards per carry; NYG's defense ranks 29th against it.
- NYG's offense ranks 10th in yards per drive; TEN's defense ranks 28th against it.
- NYG's offense ranks T-6th in third-down conversion rate; TEN's defense ranks 22nd against it.
- TEN's offense ranks T-17th in third-down conversion rate; NYG's defense ranks 31st against it.
- NYG's offense ranks T-14th in sack rate (taken); TEN's defense ranks 26th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: TEN (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak at NYG (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: the series is level at 1–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Cam Ward for TEN, Jaxson Dart for NYG.
- TEN enters on 7 days rest to NYG's 6.
- Biggest mismatch: KC's offense (5th) against MIA's defense (32nd) in points per drive.
The mismatch
- KC's offense ranks 5th in points per drive; MIA's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- KC's offense ranks 4th in share of drives ending in a score; MIA's defense ranks 29th against it.
- KC's offense ranks 8th in net yards per pass attempt; MIA's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- MIA's offense ranks 9th in average drive start (yards to go); KC's defense ranks 24th against it.
- MIA's offense ranks 18th in yards after catch; KC's defense ranks 19th against it.
- MIA's offense ranks 5th in yards per completion; KC's defense ranks T-5th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: KC (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak at MIA (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: KC leads MIA 2–0 in games since 2020.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Patrick Mahomes for KC, Malik Willis for MIA.
- Biggest mismatch: NE's offense (14th) against JAX's defense (28th) in completion rate.
The mismatch
- NE's offense ranks 14th in completion rate; JAX's defense ranks 28th against it.
- JAX's offense ranks 10th in share of drives ending in a turnover; NE's defense ranks T-21st against it.
- NE's offense ranks 20th in yards per pass attempt; JAX's defense ranks 31st against it.
- NE's offense ranks 17th in yards per drive; JAX's defense ranks 27th against it.
- JAX's offense ranks T-1st in fumbles lost; NE's defense ranks T-9th against it.
- JAX's offense ranks 10th in expected points added rushing; NE's defense ranks 15th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: NE (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak at JAX (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: JAX leads NE 2–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Drake Maye for NE, Trevor Lawrence for JAX.
- Biggest mismatch: HOU's offense (T-4th) against IND's defense (32nd) in yards after catch.
The mismatch
- HOU's offense ranks T-4th in yards after catch; IND's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- HOU's offense ranks T-1st in interception rate (thrown); IND's defense ranks T-24th against it.
- HOU's offense ranks T-7th in passing first downs; IND's defense ranks T-30th against it.
- IND's offense ranks 4th in rushing touchdowns; HOU's defense ranks T-16th against it.
- IND's offense ranks T-8th in share of drives ending in a score; HOU's defense ranks 23rd against it.
- IND's offense ranks T-4th in red-zone scoring rate; HOU's defense ranks T-15th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: HOU (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak at IND (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: HOU leads IND 8–7–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: C.J. Stroud for HOU, Daniel Jones for IND.
- Biggest mismatch: NYJ's offense (T-5th) against DET's defense (T-30th) in rushing touchdowns.
The mismatch
- NYJ's offense ranks T-5th in rushing touchdowns; DET's defense ranks T-30th against it.
- DET's offense ranks T-1st in interception rate (thrown); NYJ's defense ranks T-24th against it.
- NYJ's offense ranks T-6th in rushing first downs; DET's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- DET's offense ranks T-4th in share of drives ending in a turnover; NYJ's defense ranks 26th against it.
- NYJ's offense ranks 7th in red-zone scoring rate; DET's defense ranks T-27th against it.
- DET's offense ranks 8th in touchdown rate per pass; NYJ's defense ranks 18th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: NYJ (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak at DET (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game losing streak.
- Head-to-head: the series is level at 1–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Geno Smith for NYJ, Jared Goff for DET.
- DET enters on 10 days rest to NYJ's 7.
- Biggest mismatch: CAR's offense (5th) against CLE's defense (29th) in touchdown rate per pass.
The mismatch
- CAR's offense ranks 5th in touchdown rate per pass; CLE's defense ranks 29th against it.
- CAR's offense ranks 7th in share of drives ending in a score; CLE's defense ranks T-30th against it.
- CAR's offense ranks 4th in points per drive; CLE's defense ranks 25th against it.
- CLE's offense ranks 8th in average drive start (yards to go); CAR's defense ranks 23rd against it.
- CLE's offense ranks 14th in yards per play; CAR's defense ranks 26th against it.
- CLE's offense ranks 2nd in yards after catch; CAR's defense ranks T-13th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: CAR (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak at CLE (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: CLE leads CAR 2–0 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Bryce Young for CAR, Deshaun Watson for CLE.
- Biggest mismatch: BUF's offense (2nd) against LAC's defense (28th) in net yards per pass attempt.
The mismatch
- BUF's offense ranks 2nd in net yards per pass attempt; LAC's defense ranks 28th against it.
- BUF's offense ranks T-1st in share of drives ending in a turnover; LAC's defense ranks T-27th against it.
- BUF's offense ranks 1st in yards per pass attempt; LAC's defense ranks 26th against it.
- LAC's offense ranks 1st in red-zone scoring rate; BUF's defense ranks 26th against it.
- LAC's offense ranks 19th in touchdown rate per pass; BUF's defense ranks 28th against it.
- LAC's offense ranks T-7th in rushing touchdowns; BUF's defense ranks T-16th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: LAC (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak at BUF (2 wins, 0 losses), on a 2-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: BUF leads LAC 2–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Justin Herbert for LAC, Josh Allen for BUF.
- BUF enters on 10 days rest to LAC's 7.
- Biggest mismatch: GB's offense (3rd) against ATL's defense (24th) in yards after catch.
The mismatch
- GB's offense ranks 3rd in yards after catch; ATL's defense ranks 24th against it.
- GB's offense ranks 11th in interception rate (thrown); ATL's defense ranks T-24th against it.
- ATL's offense ranks 12th in yards after catch; GB's defense ranks 23rd against it.
- ATL's offense ranks T-6th in rushing first downs; GB's defense ranks T-17th against it.
- GB's offense ranks 4th in yards per completion; ATL's defense ranks 13th against it.
- ATL's offense ranks 16th in average drive start (yards to go); GB's defense ranks 17th against it.
Form and history
- Week 3, 2026: ATL (0 wins, 2 losses), on a 2-game losing streak at GB (1 win, 1 loss), on a 1-game winning streak.
- Head-to-head: GB leads ATL 2–1 in games since 2018.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Michael Penix Jr. for ATL, Jordan Love for GB.
Season background (65 entries)
As of week 2, how the 2026 Washington Commanders rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive sack rate allowed (2nd of 32), offensive avg time to throw (3rd of 32), and offensive avg time to throw (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive qb pressure rate faced (29th of 32), offensive qb pressure rate faced (29th of 32), and defensive epa per pass play allowed (28th of 32). Notably, offensive sack rate allowed (2nd) yet offensive qb pressure rate faced (29th).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Tennessee Titans rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg yac allowed (1st of 32), defensive yac over expected allowed (2nd of 32), and offensive avg wr separation (4th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), and defensive avg time to pressure (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Tampa Bay Buccaneers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg opp time to throw (1st of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (1st of 32), and defensive avg time to pressure (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg yac allowed (30th of 32), offensive epa per pass play (30th of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (30th of 32). Notably, defensive avg time to pressure (1st) yet offensive epa per pass play (30th).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Seattle Seahawks rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive pass yards allowed per play (1st of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (1st of 32), and defensive yards allowed per play (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg wr separation allowed (32nd of 32), offensive avg time to pressure (27th of 32), and offensive epa per rush (25th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 San Francisco 49ers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per pass play (1st of 32), offensive epa per pass play (1st of 32), and offensive qb pressure rate faced (1st of 32). Weaknesses: offensive yac over expected (32nd of 32), offensive avg time to pressure (26th of 32), and defensive avg time to pressure (26th of 32). Notably, offensive epa per pass play (1st) yet offensive avg time to pressure (26th).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Pittsburgh Steelers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), and defensive sack rate (1st of 32). Weaknesses: offensive pass yards per play (32nd of 32), offensive pass yards per play (32nd of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Philadelphia Eagles rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg time to pressure (1st of 32), offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32), and offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg time to pressure (32nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (31st of 32), and defensive avg opp time to throw (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 New York Jets rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive ryoe per attempt allowed (1st of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (2nd of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive qb pressure rate faced (31st of 32), offensive qb pressure rate faced (31st of 32), and offensive rush yards per carry (29th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 New York Giants rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive stuffed rate (4th of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (5th of 32), and defensive avg opp time to throw (5th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (32nd of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (32nd of 32), and offensive qb pressure rate faced (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 New Orleans Saints rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive pass yards allowed per play (7th of 32) and defensive pass yards allowed per play (7th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive rush yards per carry (30th of 32), offensive rush yards per carry (30th of 32), and offensive ryoe per attempt (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 New England Patriots rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per play allowed (1st of 32), offensive avg wr separation (2nd of 32), and defensive epa per pass play allowed (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive yards before contact per carry (30th of 32), offensive epa per pass play (29th of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (29th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Minnesota Vikings rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive qb pressure rate (2nd of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (2nd of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg yards after catch (31st of 32), offensive sack rate allowed (31st of 32), and defensive yac over expected allowed (31st of 32). Notably, defensive qb pressure rate (2nd) yet offensive sack rate allowed (31st).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Miami Dolphins rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg time to throw (5th of 32), offensive avg time to throw (5th of 32), and defensive yac over expected allowed (5th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive epa per pass play allowed (32nd of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (32nd of 32), and defensive sack rate (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Los Angeles Rams rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg wr separation allowed (1st of 32), offensive qb pressure rate faced (2nd of 32), and offensive qb pressure rate faced (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg wr separation (29th of 32), defensive sack rate (29th of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (26th of 32). Notably, offensive qb pressure rate faced (2nd) yet defensive sack rate (29th).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Los Angeles Chargers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive rush yards allowed per carry (1st of 32), defensive rush yards allowed per carry (1st of 32), and offensive yards after contact per carry (1st of 32). Weaknesses: offensive epa per rush (31st of 32), offensive epa per rush (31st of 32), and offensive yards before contact per carry (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Las Vegas Raiders rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), and defensive qb pressure rate (1st of 32). Weaknesses: offensive rush yards per carry (32nd of 32), offensive rush yards per carry (32nd of 32), and defensive avg opp time to throw (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Kansas City Chiefs rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg yards after catch (1st of 32), offensive epa per rush (1st of 32), and offensive epa per rush (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive yards before contact per carry allowed (29th of 32), defensive avg time to pressure (28th of 32), and offensive avg time to throw (28th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Jacksonville Jaguars rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (5th of 32), offensive epa per pass play (6th of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (6th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg wr separation (32nd of 32), offensive avg yards after catch (32nd of 32), and defensive avg wr separation allowed (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Indianapolis Colts rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (4th of 32), offensive epa per rush (5th of 32), and offensive epa per rush (5th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg yac allowed (32nd of 32), defensive epa per play allowed (32nd of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Houston Texans rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg time to pressure (2nd of 32), offensive avg yards after catch (2nd of 32), and defensive sack rate (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive stuffed rate (32nd of 32), defensive yards allowed per play (28th of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (27th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Green Bay Packers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive rush yards allowed per carry (2nd of 32), defensive rush yards allowed per carry (2nd of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg time to throw (32nd of 32), offensive avg time to throw (32nd of 32), and offensive epa per rush (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Detroit Lions rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yac over expected allowed (3rd of 32), offensive avg wr separation (6th of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (6th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive yards before contact per carry allowed (31st of 32), defensive epa per rush allowed (30th of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Denver Broncos rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg opp time to throw (2nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (2nd of 32), and offensive avg wr separation (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive rush success rate (32nd of 32), defensive ryoe per attempt allowed (32nd of 32), and offensive yards after contact per carry (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Dallas Cowboys rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per pass play (3rd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (3rd of 32), and offensive epa per play (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive epa per pass play allowed (30th of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (30th of 32), and defensive sack rate (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Cleveland Browns rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg wr separation (1st of 32), defensive yac over expected allowed (1st of 32), and defensive avg yac allowed (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive rush yards per carry (31st of 32), offensive rush yards per carry (31st of 32), and offensive ryoe per attempt (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Cincinnati Bengals rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per rush allowed (2nd of 32), defensive epa per rush allowed (2nd of 32), and defensive stuffed rate forced (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg time to pressure (32nd of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (31st of 32), and offensive avg time to throw (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Chicago Bears rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive rush yards per carry (1st of 32), offensive rush yards per carry (1st of 32), and offensive avg time to pressure (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive yards allowed per play (30th of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (29th of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (29th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Carolina Panthers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive yards per play (3rd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (5th of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (5th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive rush yards allowed per carry (32nd of 32), defensive rush yards allowed per carry (32nd of 32), and offensive avg wr separation (31st of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Buffalo Bills rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per play (1st of 32), offensive pass yards per play (1st of 32), and offensive pass yards per play (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32), and offensive yards after contact per carry (30th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Baltimore Ravens rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive rush success rate (1st of 32), offensive epa per rush (2nd of 32), and offensive epa per rush (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive yards after contact per carry (28th of 32), offensive qb pressure rate faced (25th of 32), and offensive qb pressure rate faced (25th of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Atlanta Falcons rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yards before contact per carry allowed (1st of 32), defensive rush yards allowed per carry (3rd of 32), and defensive rush yards allowed per carry (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32), and offensive epa per play (32nd of 32).
As of week 2, how the 2026 Arizona Cardinals rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg wr separation allowed (3rd of 32), defensive avg time to pressure (4th of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (4th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (30th of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (30th of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (30th of 32).
The 2026 season through week 2: San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, Las Vegas Raiders, Kansas City Chiefs, Minnesota Vikings, Cincinnati Bengals, Buffalo Bills, and Philadelphia Eagles is tied for the league's best record at 2 wins and 0 losses. Buffalo Bills has the highest-scoring offense with 77 points, while New England Patriots has allowed the fewest at 16.
Through week 2, the 2026 Washington Commanders are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 42 points and allowed 61, outscored 61 to 42.
Through week 2, the 2026 Tennessee Titans are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 30 points and allowed 47, outscored 47 to 30.
Through week 2, the 2026 Tampa Bay Buccaneers are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 46 points and allowed 56, outscored 56 to 46.
Through week 2, the 2026 Seattle Seahawks are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 44 points and allowed 17, outscoring opponents 44 to 17.
Through week 2, the 2026 San Francisco 49ers are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 62 points and allowed 20, outscoring opponents 62 to 20.
Through week 2, the 2026 Pittsburgh Steelers are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 23 points and allowed 33, outscored 33 to 23.
Through week 2, the 2026 Philadelphia Eagles are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 48 points and allowed 42, outscoring opponents 48 to 42.
Through week 2, the 2026 New York Jets are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 40 points and allowed 30, outscoring opponents 40 to 30.
Through week 2, the 2026 New York Giants are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 34 points and allowed 48, outscored 48 to 34.
Through week 2, the 2026 New Orleans Saints are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 54 points and allowed 48, outscoring opponents 54 to 48.
Through week 2, the 2026 New England Patriots are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 30 points and allowed 16, outscoring opponents 30 to 16.
Through week 2, the 2026 Minnesota Vikings are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 48 points and allowed 25, outscoring opponents 48 to 25.
Through week 2, the 2026 Miami Dolphins are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 26 points and allowed 62, outscored 62 to 26.
Through week 2, the 2026 Los Angeles Rams are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 35 points and allowed 33, outscoring opponents 35 to 33.
Through week 2, the 2026 Los Angeles Chargers are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 28 points and allowed 52, outscored 52 to 28.
Through week 2, the 2026 Las Vegas Raiders are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 53 points and allowed 27, outscoring opponents 53 to 27.
Through week 2, the 2026 Kansas City Chiefs are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 64 points and allowed 40, outscoring opponents 64 to 40.
Through week 2, the 2026 Jacksonville Jaguars are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 47 points and allowed 30, outscoring opponents 47 to 30.
Through week 2, the 2026 Indianapolis Colts are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 53 points and allowed 74, outscored 74 to 53.
Through week 2, the 2026 Houston Texans are 0 wins and 2 losses. They have scored 37 points and allowed 56, outscored 56 to 37.
Through week 2, the 2026 Green Bay Packers are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 42 points and allowed 56, outscored 56 to 42.
Through week 2, the 2026 Detroit Lions are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 62 points and allowed 71, outscored 71 to 62.
Through week 2, the 2026 Denver Broncos are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 30 points and allowed 44, outscored 44 to 30.
Through week 2, the 2026 Dallas Cowboys are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 57 points and allowed 48, outscoring opponents 57 to 48.
Through week 2, the 2026 Cleveland Browns are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 33 points and allowed 53, outscored 53 to 33.
Through week 2, the 2026 Cincinnati Bengals are 2 wins and 0 losses. They have scored 53 points and allowed 33, outscoring opponents 53 to 33.
Through week 2, the 2026 Chicago Bears are 1 win and 1 loss. They have scored 62 points and allowed 46, outscoring opponents 62 to 46.
Showing the 60 most recent of 65. Narrow it with the filters above.