Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 311 | 389.50 | -78.50 | #27 |
| Total Yards | 5172 | 5,736.19 | -564.19 | #26 |
| Yds / Play | 5 | 5.42 | -0.42 | #27 |
| 1st Downs | 309 | 335.31 | -26.31 | #24 |
| Turnovers | 34 | 20.56 | +13.44 | #31 |
| Fumbles Lost | 13 | 8.47 | +4.53 | #29 |
| EXP Pts | -62.07 | 62.00 | -124.07 | #29 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 460 | 389.50 | +70.50 | #30 |
| Total Yards | 5291 | 5,736.19 | -445.19 | #2 |
| Yds / Play | 5.20 | 5.43 | -0.23 | #5 |
| 1st Downs | 314 | 335.31 | -21.31 | #5 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 20.56 | -2.56 | #19 |
| Fumbles Lost | 7 | 8.47 | -1.47 | #22 |
| EXP Pts | -90.11 | -62.00 | -28.11 | #21 |
Scoring Composition
Where Tennessee Titans's points come from. Total = 311 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 191 | 181.84 | +9.16 | #6 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.50 | 6.01 | -0.51 | #32 |
| Yds / Drive | 26.90 | 31.52 | -4.62 | #30 |
| Points / Drive | 1.60 | 2.08 | -0.48 | #29 |
| Score % | 30.40 | 38.90 | -8.50 | #29 |
| Turnover % | 16.80 | 10.64 | +6.16 | #32 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 450 | 458.97 | -8.97 | #18 |
| Rush Yds | 1855 | 2,036.69 | -181.69 | #20 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.10 | 4.41 | -0.31 | #26 |
| Rush TD | 11 | 15.97 | -4.97 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -18.58 | 8.62 | -27.20 | #26 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 530 | 556.59 | -26.59 | #23 |
| Pass Cmp | 336 | 363.41 | -27.41 | #26 |
| Cmp % | 63.40 | 65.29 | -1.89 | #22 |
| Pass Yds | 3317 | 3,699.50 | -382.50 | #26 |
| Yds / Att | 6.30 | 6.69 | -0.39 | #23 |
| Yds / Cmp | 9.90 | 10.23 | -0.32 | #19 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.30 | 6.63 | -1.33 | #30 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.80 | 6.17 | -1.37 | #30 |
| Pass TD | 22 | 25.28 | -3.28 | #19 |
| TD % | 4.20 | 4.58 | -0.38 | #16 |
| Pass Int | 21 | 12.09 | +8.91 | #31 |
| Int % | 4 | 2.15 | +1.85 | #32 |
| Sack % | 8.90 | 6.82 | +2.08 | #27 |
| Pass Rating | 78.30 | 90.63 | -12.33 | #29 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -28.43 | 68.74 | -97.17 | #30 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 215 | 214.81 | +0.19 | #17 |
| 3rd Down Made | 81 | 85.25 | -4.25 | #20 |
| 4th Down Att | 23 | 23.94 | -0.94 | #17 |
| 4th Down Made | 9 | 13.59 | -4.59 | #26 |
| Red Zone Att | 45 | 55.44 | -10.44 | #27 |
| Red Zone Scores | 24 | 31.94 | -7.94 | #26 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 183 | 181.84 | +1.16 | #19 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.70 | 6.01 | -0.31 | #4 |
| Yds / Drive | 28.80 | 31.48 | -2.68 | #5 |
| Points / Drive | 2.26 | 2.07 | +0.19 | #24 |
| Score % | 40.40 | 38.85 | +1.55 | #20 |
| Turnover % | 8.70 | 10.70 | -2.00 | #25 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 503 | 458.97 | +44.03 | #26 |
| Rush Yds | 2277 | 2,036.69 | +240.31 | #26 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.50 | 4.42 | +0.08 | #18 |
| Rush TD | 21 | 15.97 | +5.03 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -14.45 | -8.62 | -5.83 | #18 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 473 | 556.59 | -83.59 | #32 |
| Pass Cmp | 314 | 363.41 | -49.41 | #2 |
| Cmp % | 66.40 | 65.30 | +1.10 | #23 |
| Pass Yds | 3014 | 3,699.50 | -685.50 | #2 |
| Yds / Att | 6.80 | 7.13 | -0.33 | #5 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.20 | 10.94 | -0.74 | #3 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.90 | 7.09 | -0.19 | #15 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.14 | -0.04 | #16 |
| Pass TD | 27 | 25.28 | +1.72 | #19 |
| TD % | 5.70 | 4.57 | +1.13 | #30 |
| Pass Int | 11 | 12.09 | -1.09 | #21 |
| Int % | 2.30 | 2.15 | +0.15 | #17 |
| Sack % | 6.30 | 6.86 | -0.56 | #23 |
| Pass Rating | 95.10 | 92.48 | +2.62 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -89.70 | -68.74 | -20.96 | #21 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 213 | 214.81 | -1.81 | #14 |
| 3rd Down Made | 88 | 85.25 | +2.75 | #19 |
| 4th Down Att | 13 | 23.94 | -10.94 | #1 |
| 4th Down Made | 10 | 13.59 | -3.59 | #5 |
| Red Zone Att | 57 | 55.44 | +1.56 | #18 |
| Red Zone Scores | 36 | 31.94 | +4.06 | #24 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for TEN 2024. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — TEN 2024
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% |
| 50-59 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for TEN 2024.
Pressure & Tackles — TEN 2024
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for TEN 2024. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — TEN 2024
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for TEN 2024 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — TEN 2024
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for TEN 2024. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — TEN 2024
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2024 vs 2023.
| All Purpose Yds | 6113 | 6901 | 788 |
| Kick Ret Yds | 372 | 1081 | 709 |
| Punt Ret Yds Opp | 328 | 655 | 327 |
5-Year Trajectory
TEN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2020 through 2024. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2020 | 247.5 | -174.3 | +73.3 |
| 2021 | 82.3 | -31.7 | +50.6 |
| 2022 | -27.2 | -52.1 | -79.3 |
| 2023 | 3.8 | -69.3 | -65.4 |
| 2024 | -62.1 | -90.1 | -152.2 |
Last game — Week 18, 2024
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for TEN 2024.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. TEN has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 3-14 | 2-14-1 | 12.5% | 10-7 | 58.8% | -8.8 | -5.5 | 19 | +21.5 |
| Home | 8 | 1-7 | 0-7-1 | 0.0% | 3-5 | 37.5% | -7.0 | -6.8 | 3 | +0.0 |
| Away | 9 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 22.2% | 7-2 | 77.8% | -10.3 | -4.4 | 19 | +21.5 |
| As favorite | 6 | 1-5 | 0-5-1 | 0.0% | 2-4 | 33.3% | -6.0 | -8.5 | 3 | +0.0 |
| As underdog | 11 | 2-9 | 2-9 | 18.2% | 8-3 | 72.7% | -10.3 | -3.9 | 19 | +21.5 |
| Division games | 6 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 16.7% | 3-3 | 50.0% | -4.3 | -3.8 | 5 | +13.0 |
| Non-division | 11 | 2-9 | 1-9-1 | 10.0% | 7-4 | 63.6% | -11.2 | -6.5 | 19 | +21.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 7 | 2-5 | 1-5-1 | 16.7% | 3-4 | 42.9% | -2.4 | -4.2 | 19 | +21.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 6 | 0-6 | 0-6 | 0.0% | 3-3 | 50.0% | -10.8 | -5.9 | — | -3.0 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | — | 4-0 | — | -16.8 | -7.2 | 5 | +13.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2024. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| IND | Indianapolis Colts | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | -5.5 | -4.8 |
| HOU | Houston Texans | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | -2.0 | +0.8 |
| JAX | Jacksonville Jaguars | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | -5.5 | -7.5 |
| CHI | Chicago Bears | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -7.0 | -3.0 |
| NYJ | New York Jets | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -7.0 | -3.5 |
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -16.0 | -19.0 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +19.0 | +21.5 |
| BUF | Buffalo Bills | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -24.0 | -14.5 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -38.0 | -25.5 |
| NE | New England Patriots | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 0-1 | +3.0 | +0.0 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -10.0 | -2.0 |
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -10.0 | -4.0 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -23.0 | -17.0 |
| CIN | Cincinnati Bengals | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -10.0 | -4.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 25% |
| Oct | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0% |
| Nov | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
| Dec | 5 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 0% |
| Jan | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 16 | 2-14 | 1-14-1 | 9-7 | 7% |
| Mon | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 8 | 2-6 | 1-6-1 | 4-4 | 14% |
| Second half (W10+) | 9 | 1-8 | 1-8 | 6-3 | 11% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 12 | 2-10 | 1-10-1 | 5-7 | 9% |
| Turf | 5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 5-0 | 20% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 17% |
| Same conference | 6 | 2-4 | 1-4-1 | 4-2 | 20% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 0% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold (<40°F) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Cool (40-59°F) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 0% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 5 | 2-3 | 1-3-1 | 2-3 | 25% |
| Indoor | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 4-0 | 25% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 12 | 2-10 | 1-10-1 | 6-6 | 9% |
| Windy (≥15 mph) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Indoor | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 4-0 | 25% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 6 |
| ATS | L | 6 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 1 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 6 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 6 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0% |
| After a loss | 13 | 3-10 | 2-10-1 | 8-5 | 17% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 9 | 3-6 | 2-6-1 | 7-2 | 25% |
| vs winning opp. | 7 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 6-1 | 14% |
| vs losing opp. | 8 | 2-6 | 1-6-1 | 3-5 | 14% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 13 | 2-11 | 1-11-1 | 6-7 | 8% |
| Dome | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 1-7 | 0-7-1 | 3-5 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 9 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 7-2 | 22% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 1-7 | 0-7-1 | 3-5 | 0% |
| Short (<500) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 40% |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 14 | 2-12 | 1-12-1 | 9-5 | 8% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC South
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Texans (HOU) | 10-7 | 0.481 #22 | 21.9 | 21.9 | 7.29 | 5.09 |
| Indianapolis Colts (IND) | 8-9 | 0.457 #29 | 22.2 | 25.1 | 12.49 | -73.33 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars (JAX) | 4-13 | 0.478 #24 | 18.8 | 25.6 | 13.88 | -165.95 |
| Tennessee Titans (TEN) | 3-14 | 0.522 #9 | 18.3 | 27.1 | -62.07 | -90.11 |
Insights
A look at how the 2024 Tennessee Titans ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg opp time to throw (1st of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (1st of 32), and defensive avg wr separation allowed (4th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive epa per pass play (31st of 32), offensive epa per pass play (31st of 32), and offensive epa per play (31st of 32).