Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 397 | 370.63 | +26.38 | #11 |
| Total Yards | 6197 | 5,760.38 | +436.63 | #6 |
| Yds / Play | 6.10 | 5.40 | +0.70 | #3 |
| 1st Downs | 342 | 333.31 | +8.69 | #17 |
| Turnovers | 21 | 22.19 | -1.19 | #8 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 9.13 | -3.13 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | 94.62 | 46.32 | +48.30 | #8 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 399 | 370.63 | +28.38 | #24 |
| Total Yards | 5743 | 5,760.38 | -17.38 | #18 |
| Yds / Play | 5.30 | 5.40 | -0.10 | #13 |
| 1st Downs | 336 | 333.31 | +2.69 | #18 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 22.19 | -8.19 | #30 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 9.13 | -3.13 | #29 |
| EXP Pts | -68.82 | -46.32 | -22.50 | #21 |
Scoring Composition
Where Miami Dolphins's points come from. Total = 397 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 178 | 184.56 | -6.56 | #23 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.80 | 5.96 | -0.16 | #21 |
| Yds / Drive | 34.90 | 31.23 | +3.68 | #5 |
| Points / Drive | 2.13 | 1.93 | +0.20 | #9 |
| Score % | 38.80 | 36.36 | +2.44 | #13 |
| Turnover % | 11.80 | 11.34 | +0.46 | #21 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 390 | 461.56 | -71.56 | #31 |
| Rush Yds | 1686 | 2,059.19 | -373.19 | #25 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.30 | 4.43 | -0.13 | #21 |
| Rush TD | 12 | 15.22 | -3.22 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.07 | 9.71 | -10.78 | #19 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 584 | 564.66 | +19.34 | #12 |
| Pass Cmp | 368 | 362.66 | +5.34 | #11 |
| Cmp % | 63 | 64.03 | -1.03 | #20 |
| Pass Yds | 4511 | 3,701.19 | +809.81 | #4 |
| Yds / Att | 7.70 | 6.56 | +1.14 | #2 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12.30 | 10.24 | +2.06 | #1 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.60 | 6.33 | +1.27 | #5 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.20 | 5.91 | +1.29 | #4 |
| Pass TD | 30 | 23.44 | +6.56 | #4 |
| TD % | 5.10 | 4.17 | +0.93 | #6 |
| Pass Int | 15 | 13.06 | +1.94 | #23 |
| Int % | 2.60 | 2.35 | +0.25 | #20 |
| Sack % | 5.70 | 6.83 | -1.13 | #11 |
| Pass Rating | 93.20 | 86.83 | +6.37 | #8 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 111.98 | 47.33 | +64.65 | #6 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 196 | 218.03 | -22.03 | #30 |
| 3rd Down Made | 71 | 85.94 | -14.94 | #29 |
| 4th Down Att | 24 | 23 | +1 | #16 |
| 4th Down Made | 13 | 11.66 | +1.34 | #11 |
| Red Zone Att | 50 | 52.78 | -2.78 | #18 |
| Red Zone Scores | 30 | 29.59 | +0.41 | #14 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 184 | 184.56 | -0.56 | #16 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.10 | 5.97 | +0.13 | #23 |
| Yds / Drive | 31.10 | 31.20 | -0.10 | #16 |
| Points / Drive | 2.04 | 1.93 | +0.11 | #22 |
| Score % | 37.50 | 36.28 | +1.23 | #22 |
| Turnover % | 7.60 | 11.38 | -3.78 | #29 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 422 | 461.56 | -39.56 | #7 |
| Rush Yds | 1751 | 2,059.19 | -308.19 | #6 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.10 | 4.44 | -0.34 | #5 |
| Rush TD | 15 | 15.22 | -0.22 | #18 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.83 | -9.71 | +7.88 | #16 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 624 | 564.66 | +59.34 | #2 |
| Pass Cmp | 416 | 362.66 | +53.34 | #31 |
| Cmp % | 66.70 | 64.17 | +2.53 | #27 |
| Pass Yds | 3992 | 3,701.19 | +290.81 | #27 |
| Yds / Att | 6.90 | 7.04 | -0.14 | #15 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.30 | 10.97 | -0.67 | #6 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.20 | 6.83 | +0.37 | #23 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.30 | 5.93 | +0.38 | #24 |
| Pass TD | 27 | 23.44 | +3.56 | #26 |
| TD % | 4.30 | 4.16 | +0.14 | #19 |
| Pass Int | 8 | 13.06 | -5.06 | #29 |
| Int % | 1.30 | 2.34 | -1.04 | #29 |
| Sack % | 6 | 6.68 | -0.68 | #22 |
| Pass Rating | 95.30 | 89.01 | +6.29 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -75.99 | -47.33 | -28.66 | #23 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 233 | 218.03 | +14.97 | #29 |
| 3rd Down Made | 97 | 85.94 | +11.06 | #30 |
| 4th Down Att | 31 | 23 | +8 | #29 |
| 4th Down Made | 15 | 11.66 | +3.34 | #27 |
| Red Zone Att | 59 | 52.78 | +6.22 | #28 |
| Red Zone Scores | 35 | 29.59 | +5.41 | #26 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for MIA 2022. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — MIA 2022
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% |
| 30-39 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% |
| 50-59 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for MIA 2022.
Pressure & Tackles — MIA 2022
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for MIA 2022. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — MIA 2022
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for MIA 2022 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — MIA 2022
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for MIA 2022. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — MIA 2022
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2022 vs 2021.
| All Purpose Yds | 6256 | 7310 | 1054 |
| Total Yards | 5219 | 6197 | 978 |
| Pass Yds | 3651 | 4511 | 860 |
5-Year Trajectory
MIA Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2018 through 2022. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2018 | -44.4 | -127.4 | -171.9 |
| 2019 | -28.9 | -170.0 | -198.9 |
| 2020 | 62.0 | -36.4 | +25.5 |
| 2021 | -12.0 | -16.1 | -28.1 |
| 2022 | 94.6 | -68.8 | +25.8 |
Last game — Week 18, 2022
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for MIA 2022.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. MIA has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 9-8 | 9-8 | 52.9% | 8-9 | 47.1% | -0.1 | -1.3 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Home | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 62.5% | 1-7 | 12.5% | +6.1 | +2.7 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Away | 9 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 44.4% | 7-2 | 77.8% | -5.7 | -4.8 | 4 | +7.0 |
| As favorite | 10 | 7-3 | 5-5 | 50.0% | 4-6 | 40.0% | +3.3 | -1.5 | 22 | +19.0 |
| As underdog | 7 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 4-3 | 57.1% | -5.0 | -0.9 | 4 | +7.0 |
| Division games | 6 | 3-3 | 5-1 | 83.3% | 3-3 | 50.0% | -1.3 | -0.6 | 13 | +10.0 |
| Non-division | 11 | 6-5 | 4-7 | 36.4% | 5-6 | 45.5% | +0.5 | -1.6 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 4-3 | 57.1% | +0.0 | -0.4 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | — | 2-2 | — | +1.5 | -2.1 | 5 | +1.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | +10.5 | -0.2 | 15 | +1.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | — | 1-2 | — | -8.7 | -4.5 | 2 | +6.0 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | -3.0 | +4.0 | — | +4.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2022. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| NE | New England Patriots | 2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +5.5 | +5.5 |
| BUF | Buffalo Bills | 2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | -0.5 | +5.0 |
| NYJ | New York Jets | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -9.0 | -12.2 |
| BAL | Baltimore Ravens | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +4.0 | +7.0 |
| CIN | Cincinnati Bengals | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -12.0 | -8.0 |
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -8.0 | -5.0 |
| PIT | Pittsburgh Steelers | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +6.0 | -1.5 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +4.0 | +0.5 |
| CHI | Chicago Bears | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +3.0 | -1.0 |
| CLE | Cleveland Browns | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +22.0 | +19.0 |
| HOU | Houston Texans | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +15.0 | +1.0 |
| SF | San Francisco 49ers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -16.0 | -11.5 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -6.0 | -9.0 |
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -6.0 | -9.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 75% |
| Oct | 4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 25% |
| Nov | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Dec | 4 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 25% |
| Jan | 2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Sat | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Sun | 15 | 9-6 | 8-7 | 7-8 | 53% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 9 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 44% |
| Second half (W10+) | 8 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 62% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 11 | 8-3 | 6-5 | 4-7 | 55% |
| Turf | 6 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 50% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 3-3 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 83% |
| Same conference | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 50% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 20% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold (<40°F) | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
| Cool (40-59°F) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 100% |
| Indoor | 9 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 44% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 60% |
| Windy (≥15 mph) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Indoor | 9 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 44% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 2 |
| O/U | U | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 5 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 5 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 4 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 62% |
| After a loss | 8 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 38% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 6 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 50% |
| vs winning opp. | 5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
| vs losing opp. | 9 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 56% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 15 | 8-7 | 8-7 | 7-8 | 53% |
| Dome | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 1-7 | 62% |
| Domestic road | 9 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 7-2 | 44% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 1-7 | 62% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 6-1 | 57% |
| Long (1500+) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 12 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 58% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Bills (BUF) | 13-3 | 0.489 #20 | 28.4 | 17.9 | 156.35 | 10.93 |
| Miami Dolphins (MIA) | 9-8 | 0.539 #3 | 23.4 | 23.5 | 94.62 | -68.82 |
| New England Patriots (NE) | 8-9 | 0.505 #18 | 21.4 | 20.4 | -25.81 | 55.35 |
| New York Jets (NYJ) | 7-10 | 0.541 #2 | 17.4 | 18.6 | -47.59 | 25.96 |
Insights
A look at how the 2022 Miami Dolphins ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg time to pressure (1st of 32), offensive pass yards per play (2nd of 32), and offensive pass yards per play (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive ryoe per attempt (31st of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (30th of 32), and defensive yac over expected allowed (29th of 32).