Off EXP
-41.05
Off EXP — 3-year weekly trajectory
#28
Def EXP
0.85
Def EXP — 3-year weekly trajectory (higher is better)
#8
Net EXP
-40.20
Net EXP — 3-year weekly trajectory
Record
8-8
Pythag 7.9 (+0.1)
Power Rating
100.5
#16
SRS
−0.43
#18
SoS Rank
#12
pts: +0.7 (#11)
#12
Pts / Game
17.5
Home 16.6 · Road 18.4
Points scored — 3-year weekly trajectory
#29
Net Pts / G
−1.1
#19
Pts Allowed / G
18.6
Home 18.3 · Road 19.0
Points allowed — 3-year weekly trajectory (lower is better)
#4
Yds / Play
4.70
#30
Yds/Play Allowed
5.10
#8
3rd Down %
35.6%
#25
3rd Down % Allowed
36.4%
#10

Scoring & Efficiency

Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).

Scoring & Efficiency Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.

Scoring Composition

Where Chicago Bears's points come from. Total = 280 points scored.

Offense

Drive Averages

Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Rushing

Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Passing

Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Team Conversions

Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Defense

Drive Averages Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Rushing Defense

Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Passing Defense

Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Team Conversions Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Special Teams

Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CHI 2019. Click Details for full breakdown.

82.0%
#15 of 32
93.0%
#22 of 32
2 / 3
#1 of 32
Return Yards
1,205
#3 of 32

Defensive Pressure & Tackles

Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CHI 2019.

79
#25 of 32
67
#18 of 32
52
#27 of 32
12
#20 of 32

EPA & Efficiency

Expected Points Added and CPOE for CHI 2019. Higher = better.

-30.3
#26 of 32
-62.2
#30 of 32
+54.0
#26 of 32
-1.82
#20 of 32

Air Yards & YAC

Pass distance breakdown for CHI 2019 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.

4,538
#19 of 32
1,538
#28 of 32
4,538
#19 of 32
1,538
#28 of 32

Discipline

Penalty totals and per-game rate for CHI 2019. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).

103
#11 of 32
838
#10 of 32
Yds / Game
52.4
#10 of 32

Top 10 Ranks

Where this team ranks best in the league.

Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.

Bottom 10 Ranks

Where this team ranks worst in the league.

Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.

Most Improved YoY

Biggest offensive gains 2019 vs 2018.

Punt Net Yds25013299798
Punt Yds27923586794
Kick Ret Yds440903463

5-Year Trajectory

CHI Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2018 through 2019. Trending up, down, or holding steady?

Last game — Week 17, 2019

W at MIN · 21–19
CHI failed to cover.

Passing Profile

Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CHI 2019.

Cmp %
64.0%
#14
Pass Yds/G
205.7
#25
Pass Rating
81.9
#23
Pass TD
20
#26
Pass Int
12
#15
Sack Rate
7.2%

Weekly Results vs Vegas

Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.

Betting Profile

ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CHI has 16 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.

W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.

Head-to-Head

Opponents faced in 2019. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).

GBGreen Bay Packers20-20-20-2-7.5-7.2
MINMinnesota Vikings22-01-11-1+6.0+3.8
DETDetroit Lions22-01-11-1+5.5-0.2
DENDenver Broncos11-00-10-1+2.0-1.0
WASWashington Commanders11-01-01-0+16.0+11.0
LVLas Vegas Raiders10-10-11-0-3.0-9.5
NONew Orleans Saints10-10-11-0-11.0-15.0
LACLos Angeles Chargers10-10-10-1-1.0-4.5
PHIPhiladelphia Eagles10-10-10-1-8.0-3.0
LARLos Angeles Rams10-10-10-1-10.0-5.0
NYGNew York Giants11-00-10-1+5.0-1.0
DALDallas Cowboys11-01-01-0+7.0+10.0
KCKansas City Chiefs10-10-10-1-23.0-16.5

Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).

Schedule Context

Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.

By month

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Sep43-12-21-350%
Oct30-30-32-10%
Nov53-21-41-420%
Dec42-21-32-225%

By day of week

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Thu32-11-22-133%
Sun125-72-103-917%
Mon11-01-01-0100%

By season half

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
First half (W1-9)83-52-63-525%
Second half (W10+)85-32-63-525%

By surface

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Grass146-84-104-1029%
Turf22-00-22-00%

By site role

No data.

By group

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Same division64-22-42-433%
Same conference63-32-43-333%
Inter-conference41-30-41-30%

Weather

How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.

By temperature

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Cold (<40°F)10-10-10-10%
Cool (40-59°F)83-52-63-525%
Mild (60-74°F)21-11-10-250%
Warm (75°F+)32-11-21-233%
Indoor22-00-22-00%

By wind

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Calm (<5 mph)21-10-20-20%
Breezy (5-14 mph)115-64-73-836%
Windy (≥15 mph)10-10-11-00%
Indoor22-00-22-00%

Streaks & Trends

Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.

Current streaks

DimensionStreakLength
SUW1
ATSL3
O/UO1

Longest this season

DimensionLength
Longest SU win streak3
Longest SU loss streak4
Longest ATS cover2
Longest ATS no-cover4
Longest O streak2
Longest U streak5

Performance context

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
After a win74-33-44-343%
After a loss84-41-72-612%
On 2+ winning streak42-22-22-250%
On 2+ losing streak42-21-31-325%
vs winning opp.62-41-52-417%
vs losing opp.65-12-42-433%

Travel & Venue Context

Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.

By environment

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Outdoor136-74-93-1031%
Dome22-00-22-00%
Retractable (closed)10-10-11-00%

By venue type

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Domestic home84-43-52-638%
Domestic road74-31-63-414%
International10-10-11-00%

By travel distance

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Home (0 mi)84-43-52-638%
Short (<500)32-10-32-10%
Medium (500-1500)32-11-21-233%
Long (1500+)20-20-21-10%

By rest days

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Short week (3-4d)11-00-11-00%
Standard (5-7d)105-53-73-730%
Long week (8-10d)32-11-21-233%
Bye+ (11+d)10-10-11-00%

Betting Profile Heatmap

ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.

By month
SepATS 2-24 G
OctATS 0-33 G
NovATS 1-45 G
DecATS 1-34 G
By day of week
ThuATS 1-23 G
SunATS 2-1012 G
MonATS 1-01 G
By season half
First half (W1-9)ATS 2-68 G
Second half (W10+)ATS 2-68 G
By surface
GrassATS 4-1014 G
TurfATS 0-22 G
By site role
No data.
By group
Same divisionATS 2-46 G
Same conferenceATS 2-46 G
Inter-conferenceATS 0-44 G
By environment
OutdoorATS 4-913 G
DomeATS 0-22 G
Retractable (closed)ATS 0-11 G
By venue type
Domestic homeATS 3-58 G
Domestic roadATS 1-67 G
InternationalATS 0-11 G
By travel distance
Home (0 mi)ATS 3-58 G
Short (<500)ATS 0-33 G
Medium (500-1500)ATS 1-23 G
Long (1500+)ATS 0-22 G
By rest days
Short week (3-4d)ATS 0-11 G
Standard (5-7d)ATS 3-710 G
Long week (8-10d)ATS 1-23 G
Bye+ (11+d)ATS 0-11 G
By opponent SRS
Elite (1-8)ATS 2-57 G
Above avg (9-16)ATS 0-22 G
Below avg (17-24)ATS 1-34 G
Weak (25-32)ATS 1-23 G
ATS%:< 40%40-44%45-54%55-59%≥ 60%

Spread-Role Performance

ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.

Vegas Accuracy

Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.

MAE 6.8 ptsBias -2.6 pts (Vegas over-rated this team)

Stat trajectory

Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.

Division Comparison: NFC North

This team and its three division rivals, side by side.

TeamRecordSoSPts/GPts Allowed/GOff EXPDef EXP
Chicago Bears (CHI)8-80.508 #1217.518.6-41.050.85
Detroit Lions (DET)3-12-10.506 #1321.326.431.07-137.55
Green Bay Packers (GB)13-30.453 #3223.519.689.30-26.09
Minnesota Vikings (MIN)10-60.477 #2625.418.9111.70-1.50

Insights

A look at how the 2019 Chicago Bears ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive rush success rate allowed (5th of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (6th of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (6th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive yards after contact per carry (32nd of 32), offensive pass yards per play (31st of 32), and offensive pass yards per play (31st of 32).