← All teamsAll statsAll 300 stats, ranked →

Cincinnati Bengals

AFC North

Off EXP
53.93
Off EXP — 5-year weekly trajectory
#6
Def EXP
-0.51
Def EXP — 5-year weekly trajectory (higher is better)
#8
Net EXP
53.42
Net EXP — 5-year weekly trajectory
Record
5-2
Pythag 11.3 (-6.3)
Power Rating
103.9
#4
SRS
+6.90
#2
SoS Rank
#31
pts: +0.0 (#14)
#31
Pts / Game
27.2
Home 31.0 · Road 28.3
Points scored — 5-year weekly trajectory
#4
Net Pts / G
+6.9
#4
Pts Allowed / G
20.3
Home 28.3 · Road 18.3
Points allowed — 5-year weekly trajectory (lower is better)
#8
Yds / Play
5.70
#10
Yds/Play Allowed
5.60
#23
3rd Down %
50.6%
#1
3rd Down % Allowed
48.1%
#30

Scoring & Efficiency

Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).

Scoring & Efficiency Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.

Scoring Composition

Where Cincinnati Bengals's points come from. Total = 163 points scored.

Offense

Drive Averages

Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Rushing

Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Passing

Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Team Conversions

Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Defense

Drive Averages Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Rushing Defense

Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Passing Defense

Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.

Team Conversions Defense

Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.

Special Teams

Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CIN 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.

100.0%
#1 of 32
100.0%
#1 of 32
0 / 0
#12 of 32
Return Yards
1,064
#4 of 32

Defensive Pressure & Tackles

Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CIN 2026.

46
#14 of 32
32
#17 of 32
38
#10 of 32
10
#2 of 32

EPA & Efficiency

Expected Points Added and CPOE for CIN 2026. Higher = better.

+68.0
#2 of 32
-17.6
#20 of 32
+89.5
#2 of 32
+8.98
#1 of 32

Air Yards & YAC

Pass distance breakdown for CIN 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.

2,038
#12 of 32
832
#15 of 32
2,038
#12 of 32
832
#15 of 32

Discipline

Penalty totals and per-game rate for CIN 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).

49
#8 of 32
394
#8 of 32
Yds / Game
56.3
#14 of 32

Top 10 Ranks

Where this team ranks best in the league.

Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.

Bottom 10 Ranks

Where this team ranks worst in the league.

Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.

Most Improved YoY

Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.

Penalties Yds633327-306
Pass Sacked Yds23969-170
Penalties8841-47

5-Year Trajectory

CIN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?

Ranked in all 300 stats, 2026

Last game — Week 8, 2026

W vs TEN · 43–36
CIN failed to cover.

Passing Profile

Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CIN 2026.

Cmp %
71.7%
#1
Pass Yds/G
226.3
#14
Pass Rating
110.4
#2
Pass TD
15
#2
Pass Int
3
#8
Sack Rate
4.4%

Weekly Results

Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.

1vs TBW33-27W———
2@ HOUW20-6W———
3@ PITL27-30L———
4vs JAXL17-22L———
5@ MIAW31-24P———
6———————
7@ BALW35-13W———
8vs TENW43-36L———
9———————
10———————
11———————
12———————
13———————
14———————
15———————
16———————
17———————
18———————

Weekly Results vs Vegas

Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.

Betting Profile

ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CIN has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.

W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.

Head-to-Head

Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).

TBTampa Bay Buccaneers11-01-01-0+6.0+2.5
HOUHouston Texans11-01-00-1+14.0+17.0
PITPittsburgh Steelers10-10-11-0-3.0-6.5
JAXJacksonville Jaguars10-10-10-1-5.0-7.5
MIAMiami Dolphins11-00-0-11-0+7.0+0.0
BALBaltimore Ravens11-01-01-0+22.0+19.0
TENTennessee Titans11-00-11-0+7.0-6.5

Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).

Schedule Context

Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.

By month

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Sep32-12-12-167%
Oct32-11-1-12-150%
Nov11-00-11-00%

By day of week

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Sun75-23-3-15-250%

By season half

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
First half (W1-9)75-23-3-15-250%

By surface

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Grass32-11-1-13-050%
Turf43-12-22-250%

By site role

No data.

By group

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Same division21-11-12-050%
Same conference43-11-2-12-233%
Inter-conference11-01-01-0100%

Weather

Weather data not yet available for this season.

Data coverage: 2015 onward.

Streaks & Trends

Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.

Current streaks

DimensionStreakLength
SUW3
ATSL1
O/UO3

Longest this season

DimensionLength
Longest SU win streak3
Longest SU loss streak2
Longest ATS cover2
Longest ATS no-cover2
Longest O streak3
Longest U streak1

Performance context

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
After a win43-12-23-150%
After a loss21-10-1-11-10%
On 2+ winning streak21-10-22-00%
On 2+ losing streak11-00-0-11-0—
vs winning opp.21-11-11-150%
vs losing opp.33-01-1-12-150%

Travel & Venue Context

Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.

By environment

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Outdoor64-22-3-15-140%

By venue type

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Domestic home32-11-22-133%
Domestic road43-12-1-13-167%

By travel distance

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Home (0 mi)32-11-22-133%
Short (<500)21-11-12-050%
Medium (500-1500)22-01-0-11-1100%

By rest days

BucketGSUATSO/UATS%
Standard (5-7d)53-21-3-13-225%
Bye+ (11+d)11-01-01-0100%

Betting Profile Heatmap

ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.

By month
SepATS 2-13 G
OctATS 1-1-13 G
NovATS 0-11 G
By day of week
SunATS 3-3-17 G
By season half
First half (W1-9)ATS 3-3-17 G
By surface
GrassATS 1-1-13 G
TurfATS 2-24 G
By site role
No data.
By group
Same divisionATS 1-12 G
Same conferenceATS 1-2-14 G
Inter-conferenceATS 1-01 G
By environment
OutdoorATS 2-3-16 G
By venue type
Domestic homeATS 1-23 G
Domestic roadATS 2-1-14 G
By travel distance
Home (0 mi)ATS 1-23 G
Short (<500)ATS 1-12 G
Medium (500-1500)ATS 1-0-12 G
By rest days
Standard (5-7d)ATS 1-3-15 G
Bye+ (11+d)ATS 1-01 G
By opponent SRS
Elite (1-8)ATS 1-12 G
Above avg (9-16)ATS 1-12 G
Weak (25-32)ATS 1-1-13 G
ATS%:< 40%40-44%45-54%55-59%≥ 60%

Spread-Role Performance

ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.

Vegas Accuracy

Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.

MAE 8.4 ptsBias +2.6 pts (Vegas under-rated this team)

Stat trajectory

Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.

Division Comparison: AFC North

This team and its three division rivals, side by side.

TeamRecordSoSPts/GPts Allowed/GOff EXPDef EXP
Baltimore Ravens (BAL)4-40.451 #2224.123.937.47-28
Cincinnati Bengals (CIN)5-20.413 #3127.220.353.93-0.51
Cleveland Browns (CLE)5-30.487 #1919.020.9-11.074.60
Pittsburgh Steelers (PIT)6-20.484 #2021.919.71.8712.17

Insights

As of week 7, how the 2026 Cincinnati Bengals rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive stuffed rate forced (1st of 32), defensive sack rate (2nd of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (6th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive ryoe per attempt allowed (32nd of 32), defensive yac over expected allowed (32nd of 32), and defensive avg opp time to throw (31st of 32).