Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 58 | 115.13 | -57.13 | #32 |
| Total Yards | 1232 | 1,639.66 | -407.66 | #32 |
| Yds / Play | 4.50 | 5.36 | -0.86 | #32 |
| 1st Downs | 78 | 97.13 | -19.13 | #29 |
| Turnovers | 7 | 6.28 | +0.72 | #18 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.88 | +1.13 | #21 |
| EXP Pts | -23.65 | 15.60 | -39.25 | #30 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 109 | 115.13 | -6.13 | #10 |
| Total Yards | 1659 | 1,639.66 | +19.34 | #20 |
| Yds / Play | 5.20 | 5.36 | -0.16 | #11 |
| 1st Downs | 97 | 97.13 | -0.13 | #14 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 6.28 | -4.28 | #32 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2.88 | -2.88 | #32 |
| EXP Pts | -20.49 | -15.60 | -4.89 | #21 |
Scoring Composition
Where Tennessee Titans's points come from. Total = 58 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 47 | 52.75 | -5.75 | #27 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.90 | 5.92 | -0.02 | #17 |
| Yds / Drive | 26.30 | 30.67 | -4.37 | #27 |
| Points / Drive | 1.21 | 2.11 | -0.90 | #32 |
| Score % | 23.40 | 39.28 | -15.88 | #32 |
| Turnover % | 10.60 | 11.00 | -0.40 | #20 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 108 | 131.84 | -23.84 | #29 |
| Rush Yds | 413 | 553.91 | -140.91 | #27 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.80 | 4.17 | -0.37 | #22 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 4.78 | -1.78 | #26 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.58 | -2.80 | +1.22 | #17 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 155 | 163.47 | -8.47 | #19 |
| Pass Cmp | 98 | 105.16 | -7.16 | #21 |
| Cmp % | 63.20 | 64.28 | -1.08 | #21 |
| Pass Yds | 819 | 1,085.75 | -266.75 | #31 |
| Yds / Att | 5.80 | 7.12 | -1.32 | #31 |
| Yds / Cmp | 9.10 | 11.07 | -1.97 | #31 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.30 | 7.11 | -1.81 | #30 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.50 | 6.24 | -1.74 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 3 | 7.69 | -4.69 | #31 |
| TD % | 1.90 | 4.71 | -2.81 | #30 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 3.76 | -0.76 | #8 |
| Int % | 1.90 | 2.34 | -0.44 | #12 |
| Sack % | 6.10 | 6.50 | -0.40 | #16 |
| Pass Rating | 77.20 | 92.21 | -15.01 | #28 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -26.43 | 22.83 | -49.26 | #31 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 59 | 63.09 | -4.09 | #25 |
| 3rd Down Made | 21 | 24.84 | -3.84 | #26 |
| 4th Down Att | 6 | 6.72 | -0.72 | #20 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 3.63 | -1.63 | #29 |
| Red Zone Att | 13 | 16 | -3 | #28 |
| Red Zone Scores | 6 | 9.78 | -3.78 | #30 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 52 | 52.75 | -0.75 | #10 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.40 | 5.93 | +0.47 | #26 |
| Yds / Drive | 31.80 | 30.48 | +1.32 | #20 |
| Points / Drive | 2.10 | 2.09 | +0.01 | #22 |
| Score % | 44.20 | 39.07 | +5.13 | #25 |
| Turnover % | 3.80 | 10.99 | -7.19 | #31 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 161 | 131.84 | +29.16 | #31 |
| Rush Yds | 570 | 553.91 | +16.09 | #17 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.50 | 4.19 | -0.69 | #4 |
| Rush TD | 5 | 4.78 | +0.22 | #14 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 16.73 | 2.80 | +13.93 | #4 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 146 | 163.47 | -17.47 | #26 |
| Pass Cmp | 108 | 105.16 | +2.84 | #20 |
| Cmp % | 74 | 64.35 | +9.65 | #31 |
| Pass Yds | 1089 | 1,085.75 | +3.25 | #16 |
| Yds / Att | 7.80 | 7.11 | +0.69 | #25 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.60 | 11.05 | -0.45 | #11 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.90 | 7.09 | +0.81 | #23 |
| Adj NY/A | 7 | 6.24 | +0.76 | #22 |
| Pass TD | 5 | 7.69 | -2.69 | #4 |
| TD % | 3.40 | 4.72 | -1.32 | #8 |
| Pass Int | 2 | 3.52 | -1.52 | #27 |
| Int % | 1.40 | 2.19 | -0.79 | #25 |
| Sack % | 6.40 | 6.34 | +0.06 | #16 |
| Pass Rating | 102.10 | 92.15 | +9.95 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -42.13 | -22.83 | -19.30 | #27 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 65 | 63.09 | +1.91 | #21 |
| 3rd Down Made | 25 | 24.84 | +0.16 | #16 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 6.72 | -2.72 | #6 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #15 |
| Red Zone Att | 16 | 16 | +0 | #15 |
| Red Zone Scores | 10 | 9.78 | +0.22 | #17 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for TEN 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — TEN 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 30-39 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for TEN 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — TEN 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for TEN 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — TEN 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for TEN 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — TEN 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for TEN 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — TEN 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 1011 | 248 | -763 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 417 | 77 | -340 |
| Penalties | 130 | 30 | -100 |
5-Year Trajectory
TEN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | -27.2 | -52.1 | -79.3 |
| 2023 | 3.8 | -69.3 | -65.4 |
| 2024 | -62.1 | -90.1 | -152.2 |
| 2025 | -113.9 | -125.5 | -239.4 |
| 2026 | -23.7 | -20.5 | -44.1 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for TEN 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs NYJ | L | 10-23 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs PHI | L | 20-24 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ NYG | L | 7-12 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ BAL | L | 18-24 | W | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs HOU | L | 3-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. TEN has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 40.0% | 1-4 | 20.0% | -10.2 | -5.0 | — | +5.5 |
| Home | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | — | 1-2 | — | -13.3 | -9.3 | — | +3.0 |
| Away | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | -5.5 | +1.5 | — | +5.5 |
| As favorite | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -13.0 | -14.5 | — | -14.5 |
| As underdog | 4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | — | 1-3 | — | -9.5 | -2.6 | — | +5.5 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -23.0 | -16.5 | — | -16.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | — | 1-3 | — | -7.0 | -2.1 | — | +5.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -9.0 | -8.5 | — | -2.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -23.0 | -16.5 | — | -16.5 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | — | 1-1 | — | -5.0 | +4.2 | — | +5.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Oct | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 40% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 40% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
| Turf | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Same conference | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 5 |
| ATS | L | 1 |
| O/U | U | 3 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 0 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 5 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 3 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a loss | 4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 33% |
| vs winning opp. | 2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| vs losing opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 40% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Domestic road | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC South
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Texans (HOU) | 1-4 | 0.440 #21 | 22.0 | 22.4 | 17.96 | -6.12 |
| Indianapolis Colts (IND) | 2-3 | 0.580 #8 | 24.8 | 27.6 | -3.08 | -36.34 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars (JAX) | 4-1 | 0.560 #11 | 24.6 | 14.0 | 38.97 | 8.32 |
| Tennessee Titans (TEN) | 0-5 | 0.500 #17 | 11.6 | 21.8 | -23.65 | -20.49 |
Insights
As of week 5, how the 2026 Tennessee Titans rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yac over expected allowed (1st of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (3rd of 32), and defensive rush yards allowed per carry (4th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg time to pressure (32nd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32).