Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 180 | 153.94 | +26.06 | #6 |
| Total Yards | 2735 | 2,223.56 | +511.44 | #2 |
| Yds / Play | 5.40 | 5.35 | +0.05 | #14 |
| 1st Downs | 159 | 132.25 | +26.75 | #3 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 8.19 | +2.81 | #26 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 3.63 | +2.38 | #30 |
| EXP Pts | 49.92 | 22.12 | +27.80 | #8 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 143 | 153.94 | -10.94 | #10 |
| Total Yards | 2194 | 2,223.56 | -29.56 | #15 |
| Yds / Play | 6.30 | 5.34 | +0.96 | #32 |
| 1st Downs | 107 | 132.25 | -25.25 | #3 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 8.19 | +1.81 | #7 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 3.63 | +2.38 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | -9.41 | -22.12 | +12.71 | #13 |
Scoring Composition
Where Chicago Bears's points come from. Total = 180 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 78 | 71.16 | +6.84 | #7 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.70 | 6.00 | +0.70 | #2 |
| Yds / Drive | 35 | 30.97 | +4.03 | #10 |
| Points / Drive | 2.31 | 2.12 | +0.19 | #9 |
| Score % | 41 | 39.59 | +1.41 | #12 |
| Turnover % | 14.10 | 10.59 | +3.51 | #24 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 246 | 178.38 | +67.63 | #1 |
| Rush Yds | 1080 | 746.31 | +333.69 | #1 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.17 | +0.23 | #11 |
| Rush TD | 14 | 6.38 | +7.63 | #2 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 1.15 | -2.85 | +4.00 | #12 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 241 | 223.28 | +17.72 | #9 |
| Pass Cmp | 165 | 143.16 | +21.84 | #6 |
| Cmp % | 68.50 | 64.09 | +4.41 | #5 |
| Pass Yds | 1655 | 1,477.25 | +177.75 | #10 |
| Yds / Att | 7.40 | 7.07 | +0.33 | #14 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.80 | 11.03 | -0.23 | #17 |
| Adj Y/A | 7 | 7.06 | -0.06 | #16 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.21 | -0.11 | #17 |
| Pass TD | 7 | 10.22 | -3.22 | #24 |
| TD % | 2.90 | 4.57 | -1.67 | #27 |
| Pass Int | 5 | 4.71 | +0.29 | #21 |
| Int % | 2.10 | 2.12 | -0.02 | #17 |
| Sack % | 6.90 | 6.41 | +0.49 | #20 |
| Pass Rating | 91 | 91.61 | -0.61 | #16 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 47.99 | 30.50 | +17.49 | #11 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 100 | 86.19 | +13.81 | #2 |
| 3rd Down Made | 44 | 34.34 | +9.66 | #1 |
| 4th Down Att | 17 | 9.50 | +7.50 | #1 |
| 4th Down Made | 10 | 5.09 | +4.91 | #2 |
| Red Zone Att | 30 | 22.06 | +7.94 | #1 |
| Red Zone Scores | 16 | 13.09 | +2.91 | #7 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 72 | 71.16 | +0.84 | #15 |
| Plays / Drive | 4.90 | 6.01 | -1.11 | #1 |
| Yds / Drive | 29.30 | 30.98 | -1.68 | #12 |
| Points / Drive | 1.94 | 2.11 | -0.17 | #13 |
| Score % | 33.30 | 39.47 | -6.17 | #4 |
| Turnover % | 9.70 | 10.67 | -0.97 | #17 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 138 | 178.38 | -40.38 | #2 |
| Rush Yds | 613 | 746.31 | -133.31 | #8 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.16 | +0.24 | #23 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 6.38 | -0.38 | #19 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.38 | 2.85 | -4.23 | #21 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 194 | 223.28 | -29.28 | #29 |
| Pass Cmp | 126 | 143.16 | -17.16 | #4 |
| Cmp % | 64.90 | 64.15 | +0.75 | #15 |
| Pass Yds | 1581 | 1,477.25 | +103.75 | #21 |
| Yds / Att | 8.70 | 7.07 | +1.63 | #32 |
| Yds / Cmp | 13.40 | 11.02 | +2.38 | #32 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.90 | 7.06 | +1.84 | #31 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.60 | 6.21 | +1.39 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 11 | 10.22 | +0.78 | #23 |
| TD % | 5.70 | 4.61 | +1.09 | #25 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 4.56 | -0.56 | #15 |
| Int % | 2.10 | 2.07 | +0.03 | #15 |
| Sack % | 8.90 | 6.28 | +2.62 | #3 |
| Pass Rating | 102.80 | 91.71 | +11.09 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -11.61 | -30.50 | +18.89 | #10 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 69 | 86.19 | -17.19 | #2 |
| 3rd Down Made | 18 | 34.34 | -16.34 | #1 |
| 4th Down Att | 9 | 9.50 | -0.50 | #15 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 5.09 | -3.09 | #5 |
| Red Zone Att | 17 | 22.06 | -5.06 | #5 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 13.09 | -2.09 | #11 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CHI 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — CHI 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| 50-59 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CHI 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — CHI 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for CHI 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — CHI 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for CHI 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — CHI 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for CHI 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — CHI 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 970 | 411 | -559 |
| Penalties | 120 | 53 | -67 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 165 | 129 | -36 |
5-Year Trajectory
CHI Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | -7.1 | -169.1 | -176.3 |
| 2023 | -10.7 | -34.6 | -45.3 |
| 2024 | -43.5 | -53.7 | -97.1 |
| 2025 | 117.9 | -98.1 | +19.8 |
| 2026 | 49.9 | -9.4 | +40.5 |
Last game — Week 7, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CHI 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ CAR | W | 59-37 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs MIN | L | 3-9 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs PHI | W | 27-7 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs NYJ | W | 23-12 | W | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ GB | L | 7-31 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | @ ATL | W | 31-23 | W | — | — | — |
| 7 | vs NE | W | 30-24 | W | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CHI has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 3-4 | 42.9% | +5.3 | +3.4 | 22 | +23.5 |
| Home | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 1-3 | — | +7.8 | +5.9 | 20 | +23.5 |
| Away | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +2.0 | +0.0 | 22 | +19.0 |
| As favorite | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 3-3 | 50.0% | +2.8 | +0.0 | 22 | +19.0 |
| As underdog | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +20.0 | +23.5 | 20 | +23.5 |
| Division games | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -15.0 | -18.0 | — | -10.5 |
| Non-division | 5 | 5-0 | 5-0 | 100.0% | 3-2 | 60.0% | +13.4 | +11.9 | 22 | +23.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 3-1 | — | +3.0 | +0.8 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | +2.5 | -1.5 | 11 | +7.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +20.0 | +23.5 | 20 | +23.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| CAR | Carolina Panthers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +22.0 | +19.0 |
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -6.0 | -10.5 |
| PHI | Philadelphia Eagles | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +20.0 | +23.5 |
| NYJ | New York Jets | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +11.0 | +7.5 |
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -24.0 | -25.5 |
| ATL | Atlanta Falcons | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +8.0 | +6.5 |
| NE | New England Patriots | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +6.0 | +3.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| Oct | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Sun | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 60% |
| Mon | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 71% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 67% |
| Turf | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
| Same conference | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 2 |
| ATS | W | 2 |
| O/U | O | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 2 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 2 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 4 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
| After a loss | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| vs winning opp. | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 67% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 75% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 75% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 5-2 | 0.487 #18 | 25.7 | 20.4 | 49.92 | -9.41 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 5-2 | 0.526 #13 | 30.7 | 27.5 | 84.86 | -86.63 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 5-3 | 0.511 #15 | 20.6 | 20.7 | 13.49 | -11.38 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 6-1 | 0.444 #25 | 20.8 | 12.3 | -23.95 | 56.20 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 Chicago Bears rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg time to pressure (2nd of 32), offensive avg time to throw (3rd of 32), and offensive avg time to throw (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive yards allowed per play (32nd of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (30th of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (30th of 32).