Chicago Bears
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 62 | 44.94 | +17.06 | #4 |
| Total Yards | 849 | 651.56 | +197.44 | #3 |
| Yds / Play | 6.10 | 5.36 | +0.74 | #7 |
| 1st Downs | 43 | 38.38 | +4.63 | #9 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 2.43 | +0.57 | #24 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 1 | +1 | #29 |
| EXP Pts | 20.65 | 6.35 | +14.30 | #7 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 62 | 44.94 | +17.06 | #29 |
| Total Yards | 849 | 651.56 | +197.44 | #30 |
| Yds / Play | 6.10 | 5.36 | +0.74 | #26 |
| 1st Downs | 43 | 38.38 | +4.63 | #24 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 2.43 | +0.57 | #7 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 1 | +1 | #4 |
Scoring Composition
Where Chicago Bears's points come from. Total = 62 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 24 | 21.22 | +2.78 | #4 |
| Plays / Drive | 6 | 5.93 | +0.07 | #13 |
| Yds / Drive | 35.40 | 30.70 | +4.70 | #7 |
| Points / Drive | 2.58 | 2.09 | +0.49 | #9 |
| Score % | 41.70 | 38.59 | +3.11 | #13 |
| Turnover % | 12.50 | 10.26 | +2.24 | #24 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 70 | 54.06 | +15.94 | #1 |
| Rush Yds | 425 | 225.34 | +199.66 | #1 |
| Rush Y/A | 6.10 | 4.12 | +1.98 | #1 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 1.75 | +4.25 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 7.47 | -1.33 | +8.80 | #4 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 64 | 62.94 | +1.06 | #13 |
| Pass Cmp | 41 | 41 | +0 | #13 |
| Cmp % | 64.10 | 65.32 | -1.22 | #20 |
| Pass Yds | 424 | 426.22 | -2.22 | #15 |
| Yds / Att | 7.20 | 7.27 | -0.07 | #15 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.20 | 11.17 | +0.03 | #13 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.10 | 7.31 | -0.21 | #18 |
| Adj NY/A | 6 | 6.40 | -0.40 | #19 |
| Pass TD | 2 | 3.16 | -1.16 | #21 |
| TD % | 3.10 | 5.06 | -1.96 | #24 |
| Pass Int | 1 | 1.64 | -0.64 | #13 |
| Int % | 1.60 | 2.76 | -1.16 | #10 |
| Sack % | 8.60 | 7.20 | +1.40 | #21 |
| Pass Rating | 89.40 | 94.62 | -5.22 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 14.40 | 9.36 | +5.04 | #13 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 29 | 25.16 | +3.84 | #6 |
| 3rd Down Made | 15 | 10.09 | +4.91 | #3 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 2.22 | +1.78 | #3 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 1.16 | +0.84 | #3 |
| Red Zone Att | 7 | 6.31 | +0.69 | #9 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 3.84 | +0.16 | #12 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 24 | 21.22 | +2.78 | #29 |
| Plays / Drive | 6 | 5.93 | +0.07 | #20 |
| Yds / Drive | 35.40 | 30.70 | +4.70 | #26 |
| Points / Drive | 2.58 | 2.09 | +0.49 | #24 |
| Score % | 41.70 | 38.59 | +3.11 | #20 |
| Turnover % | 12.50 | 10.26 | +2.24 | #9 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 70 | 54.06 | +15.94 | #32 |
| Rush Yds | 425 | 225.34 | +199.66 | #32 |
| Rush Y/A | 6.10 | 4.12 | +1.98 | #32 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 1.75 | +4.25 | #32 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 64 | 62.94 | +1.06 | #13 |
| Pass Cmp | 41 | 41 | +0 | #20 |
| Cmp % | 64.10 | 65.32 | -1.22 | #13 |
| Pass Yds | 424 | 426.22 | -2.22 | #18 |
| Yds / Att | 7.20 | 7.27 | -0.07 | #18 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.20 | 11.17 | +0.03 | #20 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.10 | 7.31 | -0.21 | #15 |
| Adj NY/A | 6 | 6.40 | -0.40 | #14 |
| Pass TD | 2 | 3.16 | -1.16 | #12 |
| TD % | 3.10 | 5.06 | -1.96 | #9 |
| Pass Int | 1 | 1.64 | -0.64 | #13 |
| Int % | 1.60 | 2.76 | -1.16 | #16 |
| Sack % | 8.60 | 7.20 | +1.40 | #11 |
| Pass Rating | 89.40 | 94.62 | -5.22 | #13 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 29 | 25.16 | +3.84 | #27 |
| 3rd Down Made | 15 | 10.09 | +4.91 | #30 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 2.22 | +1.78 | #30 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 1.16 | +0.84 | #30 |
| Red Zone Att | 7 | 6.31 | +0.69 | #24 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 3.84 | +0.16 | #21 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CHI 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special-teams data not available for this team-year.
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CHI 2026.
Defense pressure data not available for this team-year.
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for CHI 2026. Higher = better.
EPA data not available for this team-year.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for CHI 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air yards data not available for this team-year.
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for CHI 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline data not available for this team-year.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 970 | 115 | -855 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 165 | 37 | -128 |
| Penalties | 120 | 20 | -100 |
5-Year Trajectory
CHI Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | -7.1 | -169.1 | -176.3 |
| 2023 | -10.7 | -34.6 | -45.3 |
| 2024 | -43.5 | -53.7 | -97.1 |
| 2025 | 117.9 | -98.1 | +19.8 |
Last game — Week 2, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CHI 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ CAR | W | 59-37 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs MIN | L | 3-9 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CHI has 2 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +8.0 | +4.2 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Home | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -6.0 | -10.5 | — | -10.5 |
| Away | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +22.0 | +19.0 | 22 | +19.0 |
| As favorite | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +8.0 | +4.2 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -6.0 | -10.5 | — | -10.5 |
| Non-division | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +22.0 | +19.0 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +22.0 | +19.0 | 22 | +19.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -6.0 | -10.5 | — | -10.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Same conference | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 1 |
| O/U | U | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 1 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 1 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 1-1 | 0.750 #5 | 31.0 | 31.0 | 20.65 | 20.65 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 1-1 | 0.750 #7 | 31.0 | 31.0 | 24.80 | 24.80 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 1-1 | 0.750 #11 | 21.0 | 21.0 | -11.27 | -11.27 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 2-0 | 0.500 #19 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 2.46 | 2.46 |
Insights
As of week 2, how the 2026 Chicago Bears rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive rush yards per carry (1st of 32), offensive rush yards per carry (1st of 32), and offensive avg time to pressure (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive yards allowed per play (30th of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (29th of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (29th of 32).