Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 84 | 115.13 | -31.13 | #30 |
| Total Yards | 1464 | 1,639.66 | -175.66 | #25 |
| Yds / Play | 4.80 | 5.36 | -0.56 | #22 |
| 1st Downs | 88 | 97.13 | -9.13 | #23 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 6.28 | +6.72 | #32 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 2.88 | +3.13 | #32 |
| EXP Pts | -28.76 | 15.60 | -44.36 | #32 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 129 | 115.13 | +13.88 | #23 |
| Total Yards | 1558 | 1,639.66 | -81.66 | #12 |
| Yds / Play | 5 | 5.36 | -0.36 | #7 |
| 1st Downs | 96 | 97.13 | -1.13 | #13 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 6.28 | +1.72 | #7 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.88 | +1.13 | #6 |
| EXP Pts | 3.53 | -15.60 | +19.13 | #6 |
Scoring Composition
Where Los Angeles Chargers's points come from. Total = 84 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 60 | 52.75 | +7.25 | #2 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.30 | 5.92 | -0.62 | #30 |
| Yds / Drive | 24.40 | 30.67 | -6.27 | #30 |
| Points / Drive | 1.40 | 2.11 | -0.71 | #31 |
| Score % | 26.70 | 39.28 | -12.58 | #31 |
| Turnover % | 20 | 11.00 | +9.00 | #31 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 147 | 131.84 | +15.16 | #8 |
| Rush Yds | 641 | 553.91 | +87.09 | #9 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.17 | +0.23 | #14 |
| Rush TD | 4 | 4.78 | -0.78 | #17 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -15.58 | -2.80 | -12.78 | #27 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 144 | 163.47 | -19.47 | #24 |
| Pass Cmp | 85 | 105.16 | -20.16 | #29 |
| Cmp % | 59 | 64.28 | -5.28 | #29 |
| Pass Yds | 823 | 1,085.75 | -262.75 | #30 |
| Yds / Att | 6.50 | 7.12 | -0.62 | #22 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11 | 11.07 | -0.07 | #17 |
| Adj Y/A | 5 | 7.11 | -2.11 | #32 |
| Adj NY/A | 3.80 | 6.24 | -2.44 | #32 |
| Pass TD | 5 | 7.69 | -2.69 | #25 |
| TD % | 3.50 | 4.71 | -1.21 | #25 |
| Pass Int | 7 | 3.76 | +3.24 | #28 |
| Int % | 4.90 | 2.34 | +2.56 | #28 |
| Sack % | 10.60 | 6.50 | +4.10 | #31 |
| Pass Rating | 69.70 | 92.21 | -22.51 | #31 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -7.75 | 22.83 | -30.58 | #28 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 66 | 63.09 | +2.91 | #14 |
| 3rd Down Made | 23 | 24.84 | -1.84 | #21 |
| 4th Down Att | 8 | 6.72 | +1.28 | #11 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 3.63 | -1.63 | #24 |
| Red Zone Att | 13 | 16 | -3 | #25 |
| Red Zone Scores | 8 | 9.78 | -1.78 | #23 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 60 | 52.75 | +7.25 | #32 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.20 | 5.93 | -0.73 | #2 |
| Yds / Drive | 25.30 | 30.48 | -5.18 | #4 |
| Points / Drive | 2.02 | 2.09 | -0.07 | #17 |
| Score % | 38.30 | 39.07 | -0.77 | #15 |
| Turnover % | 13.30 | 10.99 | +2.31 | #8 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 158 | 131.84 | +26.16 | #30 |
| Rush Yds | 593 | 553.91 | +39.09 | #21 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.80 | 4.19 | -0.39 | #9 |
| Rush TD | 7 | 4.78 | +2.22 | #29 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 18.60 | 2.80 | +15.80 | #2 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 141 | 163.47 | -22.47 | #29 |
| Pass Cmp | 91 | 105.16 | -14.16 | #7 |
| Cmp % | 64.50 | 64.35 | +0.15 | #17 |
| Pass Yds | 965 | 1,085.75 | -120.75 | #8 |
| Yds / Att | 7.30 | 7.11 | +0.19 | #19 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.30 | 11.05 | +0.25 | #21 |
| Adj Y/A | 7 | 7.09 | -0.09 | #18 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.24 | -0.14 | #18 |
| Pass TD | 7 | 7.69 | -0.69 | #17 |
| TD % | 5 | 4.72 | +0.28 | #19 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 3.52 | +0.48 | #11 |
| Int % | 2.80 | 2.19 | +0.61 | #8 |
| Sack % | 7.20 | 6.34 | +0.86 | #13 |
| Pass Rating | 90.90 | 92.15 | -1.25 | #19 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -20.96 | -22.83 | +1.87 | #20 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 64 | 63.09 | +0.91 | #18 |
| 3rd Down Made | 20 | 24.84 | -4.84 | #7 |
| 4th Down Att | 5 | 6.72 | -1.72 | #9 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #18 |
| Red Zone Att | 21 | 16 | +5 | #28 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 9.78 | +1.22 | #22 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for LAC 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — LAC 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| 50-59 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for LAC 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — LAC 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for LAC 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — LAC 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for LAC 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — LAC 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for LAC 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — LAC 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 787 | 382 | -405 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 345 | 114 | -231 |
| Penalties | 104 | 47 | -57 |
5-Year Trajectory
LAC Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 72.5 | -81.4 | -9.0 |
| 2023 | -5.4 | -92.7 | -98.0 |
| 2024 | 105.1 | -11.7 | +93.4 |
| 2025 | 31.9 | 3.5 | +35.4 |
| 2026 | -28.8 | 3.5 | -25.2 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for LAC 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs ARI | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs LV | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ BUF | L | 16-24 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ SEA | L | 23-30 | P | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs DEN | L | 17-23 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. LAC has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 0.0% | 1-4 | 20.0% | -9.0 | -8.5 | — | +0.0 |
| Home | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | — | 0-3 | — | -10.0 | -13.8 | — | -2.5 |
| Away | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -7.5 | -0.5 | — | +0.0 |
| As favorite | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -12.0 | -19.5 | — | -18.5 |
| As underdog | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | -7.0 | -1.2 | — | +0.0 |
| Division games | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -9.0 | -10.5 | — | -2.5 |
| Non-division | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | -9.0 | -7.2 | — | +0.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -18.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -20.5 | — | -20.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -6.0 | -2.5 | — | -2.5 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -7.5 | -0.5 | — | +0.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Oct | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 1-4 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 1-4 | 0% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Turf | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 1-3 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
| Same conference | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 5 |
| ATS | L | 1 |
| O/U | U | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 0 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 5 |
| Longest ATS cover | 0 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 3 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 3 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a loss | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 1-3 | 0% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
| vs winning opp. | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Retractable (closed) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | — |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 1-3 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver Broncos (DEN) | 3-2 | 0.640 #6 | 19.4 | 22.2 | -11.54 | -6.77 |
| Kansas City Chiefs (KC) | 4-0 | 0.400 #25 | 29.5 | 19.3 | 48.87 | -0.77 |
| Los Angeles Chargers (LAC) | 0-5 | 0.560 #10 | 16.8 | 25.8 | -28.76 | 3.53 |
| Las Vegas Raiders (LV) | 3-2 | 0.360 #29 | 26.4 | 25.8 | 19.08 | -26.06 |
Insights
As of week 5, how the 2026 Los Angeles Chargers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg yac allowed (4th of 32), defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (5th of 32), and defensive avg wr separation allowed (7th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive epa per play (32nd of 32), offensive sack rate allowed (31st of 32), and offensive avg yards after catch (30th of 32).