Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 197 | 153.94 | +43.06 | #2 |
| Total Yards | 2600 | 2,223.56 | +376.44 | #4 |
| Yds / Play | 6.40 | 5.35 | +1.05 | #3 |
| 1st Downs | 149 | 132.25 | +16.75 | #4 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 8.19 | +1.81 | #22 |
| Fumbles Lost | 6 | 3.63 | +2.38 | #27 |
| EXP Pts | 84.74 | 22.12 | +62.62 | #4 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 139 | 153.94 | -14.94 | #7 |
| Total Yards | 2095 | 2,223.56 | -128.56 | #10 |
| Yds / Play | 4.70 | 5.34 | -0.64 | #3 |
| 1st Downs | 125 | 132.25 | -7.25 | #12 |
| Turnovers | 7 | 8.19 | -1.19 | #22 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #16 |
| EXP Pts | -0.02 | -22.12 | +22.10 | #7 |
Scoring Composition
Where San Francisco 49ers's points come from. Total = 197 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 69 | 71.16 | -2.16 | #20 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.10 | 6.00 | +0.10 | #14 |
| Yds / Drive | 37.70 | 30.97 | +6.73 | #1 |
| Points / Drive | 2.80 | 2.12 | +0.68 | #3 |
| Score % | 44.90 | 39.59 | +5.31 | #7 |
| Turnover % | 11.60 | 10.59 | +1.01 | #19 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 191 | 178.38 | +12.63 | #9 |
| Rush Yds | 892 | 746.31 | +145.69 | #6 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.70 | 4.17 | +0.53 | #7 |
| Rush TD | 10 | 6.38 | +3.63 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 19 | -2.85 | +21.85 | #3 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 211 | 223.28 | -12.28 | #20 |
| Pass Cmp | 146 | 143.16 | +2.84 | #13 |
| Cmp % | 69.20 | 64.09 | +5.11 | #4 |
| Pass Yds | 1708 | 1,477.25 | +230.75 | #7 |
| Yds / Att | 8.30 | 7.07 | +1.23 | #4 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12 | 11.03 | +0.97 | #7 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.90 | 7.06 | +1.84 | #3 |
| Adj NY/A | 8.40 | 6.21 | +2.19 | #2 |
| Pass TD | 15 | 10.22 | +4.78 | #3 |
| TD % | 7.10 | 4.57 | +2.53 | #2 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 4.71 | -0.71 | #9 |
| Int % | 1.90 | 2.12 | -0.22 | #12 |
| Sack % | 3.20 | 6.41 | -3.21 | #2 |
| Pass Rating | 110.10 | 91.61 | +18.49 | #3 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 68.22 | 30.50 | +37.72 | #4 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 76 | 86.19 | -10.19 | #27 |
| 3rd Down Made | 38 | 34.34 | +3.66 | #10 |
| 4th Down Att | 8 | 9.50 | -1.50 | #22 |
| 4th Down Made | 6 | 5.09 | +0.91 | #11 |
| Red Zone Att | 22 | 22.06 | -0.06 | #17 |
| Red Zone Scores | 19 | 13.09 | +5.91 | #4 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 72 | 71.16 | +0.84 | #13 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.40 | 6.01 | +0.39 | #25 |
| Yds / Drive | 28.80 | 30.98 | -2.18 | #8 |
| Points / Drive | 1.93 | 2.11 | -0.18 | #12 |
| Score % | 40.30 | 39.47 | +0.83 | #18 |
| Turnover % | 8.30 | 10.67 | -2.37 | #26 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 179 | 178.38 | +0.63 | #16 |
| Rush Yds | 623 | 746.31 | -123.31 | #10 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.50 | 4.16 | -0.66 | #3 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 6.38 | -3.38 | #2 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 29.97 | 2.85 | +27.12 | #1 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 248 | 223.28 | +24.72 | #4 |
| Pass Cmp | 166 | 143.16 | +22.84 | #30 |
| Cmp % | 66.90 | 64.15 | +2.75 | #29 |
| Pass Yds | 1472 | 1,477.25 | -5.25 | #13 |
| Yds / Att | 6.30 | 7.07 | -0.77 | #6 |
| Yds / Cmp | 9.40 | 11.02 | -1.62 | #2 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.60 | 7.06 | -0.46 | #12 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.80 | 6.21 | -0.41 | #12 |
| Pass TD | 10 | 10.22 | -0.22 | #15 |
| TD % | 4 | 4.61 | -0.61 | #12 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 4.56 | -1.56 | #28 |
| Int % | 1.20 | 2.07 | -0.87 | #28 |
| Sack % | 5.70 | 6.28 | -0.58 | #21 |
| Pass Rating | 92.60 | 91.71 | +0.89 | #18 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -30.67 | -30.50 | -0.17 | #18 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 95 | 86.19 | +8.81 | #28 |
| 3rd Down Made | 36 | 34.34 | +1.66 | #15 |
| 4th Down Att | 12 | 9.50 | +2.50 | #23 |
| 4th Down Made | 6 | 5.09 | +0.91 | #22 |
| Red Zone Att | 23 | 22.06 | +0.94 | #17 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 13.09 | -2.09 | #10 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for SF 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — SF 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for SF 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — SF 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for SF 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — SF 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for SF 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — SF 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for SF 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — SF 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 651 | 386 | -265 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 161 | 40 | -121 |
| Penalties | 83 | 43 | -40 |
5-Year Trajectory
SF Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 142.9 | 68.1 | +211.0 |
| 2023 | 231.5 | 16.1 | +247.5 |
| 2024 | 115.8 | -88.8 | +27.0 |
| 2025 | 131.1 | -115.5 | +15.6 |
| 2026 | 84.7 | 0.0 | +84.7 |
Last game — Week 7, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for SF 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ LAR | W | 27-7 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs MIA | W | 35-13 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs ARI | W | 36-30 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs DEN | W | 24-14 | W | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ SEA | W | 32-29 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | vs WAS | W | 23-17 | L | — | — | — |
| 7 | @ ATL | L | 20-29 | L | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. SF has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 3-4 | 42.9% | +8.3 | +4.5 | 22 | +23.5 |
| Home | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | — | 2-2 | — | +11.0 | +3.4 | 22 | +9.5 |
| Away | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | +4.7 | +6.0 | 20 | +23.5 |
| As favorite | 5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 40.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | +7.0 | +0.4 | 22 | +9.5 |
| As underdog | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | — | 1-1 | — | +11.5 | +14.8 | 20 | +23.5 |
| Division games | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +9.7 | +9.3 | 20 | +23.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | — | 1-3 | — | +7.2 | +0.9 | 22 | +9.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | +1.3 | +0.5 | 10 | +7.0 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | — | 2-1 | — | +11.3 | +2.2 | 22 | +9.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +20.0 | +23.5 | 20 | +23.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| LAR | Los Angeles Rams | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +20.0 | +23.5 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +22.0 | +9.5 |
| ARI | Arizona Cardinals | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +6.0 | -1.5 |
| DEN | Denver Broncos | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +10.0 | +7.0 |
| SEA | Seattle Seahawks | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +3.0 | +6.0 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +6.0 | -1.5 |
| ATL | Atlanta Falcons | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -9.0 | -11.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Oct | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Sun | 5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
| Mon | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 57% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 5 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 60% |
| Turf | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Same conference | 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 2 |
| O/U | U | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 6 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 2 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 40% |
| vs winning opp. | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| vs losing opp. | 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 6 | 6-0 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 67% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| International | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Long (1500+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals (ARI) | 3-5 | 0.551 #8 | 20.3 | 29.7 | 11.61 | -68.85 |
| Los Angeles Rams (LAR) | 4-4 | 0.529 #10 | 24.3 | 22.7 | 59.47 | -2.19 |
| Seattle Seahawks (SEA) | 4-3 | 0.526 #11 | 24.0 | 17.9 | 3.18 | 33.65 |
| San Francisco 49ers (SF) | 6-1 | 0.439 #27 | 28.1 | 19.9 | 84.74 | -0.02 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 San Francisco 49ers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), and offensive qb pressure rate faced (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg wr separation allowed (30th of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (27th of 32), and defensive qb pressure rate (27th of 32).
Rivalries
- Los Angeles Rams and San Francisco 49ers have met 16 times in the regular season. San Francisco 49ers leads the series 10 to 6. The most lopsided meeting was a 29-point win for Los Angeles Rams in 2018.