Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 168 | 153.94 | +14.06 | #10 |
| Total Yards | 2403 | 2,223.56 | +179.44 | #9 |
| Yds / Play | 5.40 | 5.35 | +0.05 | #16 |
| 1st Downs | 145 | 132.25 | +12.75 | #10 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 8.19 | +4.81 | #29 |
| Fumbles Lost | 5 | 3.63 | +1.38 | #22 |
| EXP Pts | 3.18 | 22.12 | -18.94 | #22 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 125 | 153.94 | -28.94 | #5 |
| Total Yards | 1637 | 2,223.56 | -586.56 | #2 |
| Yds / Play | 4 | 5.34 | -1.34 | #1 |
| 1st Downs | 104 | 132.25 | -28.25 | #2 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 8.19 | +3.81 | #3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #17 |
| EXP Pts | 33.65 | -22.12 | +55.77 | #3 |
Scoring Composition
Where Seattle Seahawks's points come from. Total = 168 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 82 | 71.16 | +10.84 | #1 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.60 | 6.00 | -0.40 | #28 |
| Yds / Drive | 29.30 | 30.97 | -1.67 | #20 |
| Points / Drive | 2.05 | 2.12 | -0.07 | #18 |
| Score % | 39 | 39.59 | -0.59 | #15 |
| Turnover % | 15.90 | 10.59 | +5.31 | #28 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 206 | 178.38 | +27.63 | #5 |
| Rush Yds | 796 | 746.31 | +49.69 | #12 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.90 | 4.17 | -0.27 | #24 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 6.38 | -0.38 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -24.07 | -2.85 | -21.22 | #30 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 226 | 223.28 | +2.72 | #14 |
| Pass Cmp | 146 | 143.16 | +2.84 | #14 |
| Cmp % | 64.60 | 64.09 | +0.51 | #17 |
| Pass Yds | 1607 | 1,477.25 | +129.75 | #12 |
| Yds / Att | 7.60 | 7.07 | +0.53 | #9 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.80 | 11.03 | +0.77 | #11 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.10 | 7.06 | +0.04 | #14 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.21 | -0.11 | #18 |
| Pass TD | 12 | 10.22 | +1.78 | #13 |
| TD % | 5.30 | 4.57 | +0.73 | #8 |
| Pass Int | 8 | 4.71 | +3.29 | #29 |
| Int % | 3.50 | 2.12 | +1.38 | #28 |
| Sack % | 6.60 | 6.41 | +0.19 | #17 |
| Pass Rating | 90.70 | 91.61 | -0.91 | #19 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 33.36 | 30.50 | +2.86 | #18 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 90 | 86.19 | +3.81 | #14 |
| 3rd Down Made | 35 | 34.34 | +0.66 | #16 |
| 4th Down Att | 8 | 9.50 | -1.50 | #23 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 5.09 | -1.09 | #21 |
| Red Zone Att | 24 | 22.06 | +1.94 | #11 |
| Red Zone Scores | 12 | 13.09 | -1.09 | #22 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 79 | 71.16 | +7.84 | #29 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.30 | 6.01 | -0.71 | #2 |
| Yds / Drive | 20.70 | 30.98 | -10.28 | #1 |
| Points / Drive | 1.41 | 2.11 | -0.70 | #2 |
| Score % | 26.60 | 39.47 | -12.87 | #2 |
| Turnover % | 12.70 | 10.67 | +2.03 | #10 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 180 | 178.38 | +1.63 | #18 |
| Rush Yds | 626 | 746.31 | -120.31 | #11 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.50 | 4.16 | -0.66 | #2 |
| Rush TD | 4 | 6.38 | -2.38 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 14.96 | 2.85 | +12.11 | #4 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 213 | 223.28 | -10.28 | #23 |
| Pass Cmp | 133 | 143.16 | -10.16 | #11 |
| Cmp % | 62.40 | 64.15 | -1.75 | #10 |
| Pass Yds | 1011 | 1,477.25 | -466.25 | #2 |
| Yds / Att | 5.20 | 7.07 | -1.87 | #1 |
| Yds / Cmp | 8.30 | 11.02 | -2.72 | #1 |
| Adj Y/A | 4.30 | 7.06 | -2.76 | #1 |
| Adj NY/A | 3.50 | 6.21 | -2.71 | #2 |
| Pass TD | 8 | 10.22 | -2.22 | #9 |
| TD % | 3.80 | 4.61 | -0.81 | #10 |
| Pass Int | 8 | 4.56 | +3.44 | #2 |
| Int % | 3.80 | 2.07 | +1.73 | #2 |
| Sack % | 7.40 | 6.28 | +1.12 | #9 |
| Pass Rating | 72.60 | 91.71 | -19.11 | #2 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 15.69 | -30.50 | +46.19 | #2 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 93 | 86.19 | +6.81 | #26 |
| 3rd Down Made | 26 | 34.34 | -8.34 | #6 |
| 4th Down Att | 10 | 9.50 | +0.50 | #18 |
| 4th Down Made | 9 | 5.09 | +3.91 | #29 |
| Red Zone Att | 14 | 22.06 | -8.06 | #3 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 13.09 | -2.09 | #9 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for SEA 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — SEA 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
| 50-59 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for SEA 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — SEA 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for SEA 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — SEA 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for SEA 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — SEA 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for SEA 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — SEA 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 793 | 468 | -325 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 186 | 119 | -67 |
| Penalties | 100 | 51 | -49 |
5-Year Trajectory
SEA Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 57.2 | -85.6 | -28.4 |
| 2023 | 62.3 | -122.5 | -60.1 |
| 2024 | 26.6 | -11.4 | +15.2 |
| 2025 | 80.5 | 81.1 | +161.6 |
| 2026 | 3.2 | 33.7 | +36.8 |
Last game — Week 7, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for SEA 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs NE | W | 13-10 | P | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ ARI | W | 31-7 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ WAS | L | 31-33 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs LAC | W | 30-23 | P | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs SF | L | 29-32 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | @ DEN | L | 14-17 | L | — | — | — |
| 7 | vs KC | W | 20-3 | W | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. SEA has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 4-3 | 2-3-2 | 40.0% | 3-4 | 42.9% | +6.1 | +1.8 | 24 | +20.5 |
| Home | 4 | 3-1 | 1-1-2 | — | 2-2 | — | +6.0 | +2.0 | 17 | +14.0 |
| Away | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | — | 1-2 | — | +6.3 | +1.5 | 24 | +20.5 |
| As favorite | 7 | 4-3 | 2-3-2 | 40.0% | 3-4 | 42.9% | +6.1 | +1.8 | 24 | +20.5 |
| Division games | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +10.5 | +7.2 | 24 | +20.5 |
| Non-division | 5 | 3-2 | 1-2-2 | 33.3% | 2-3 | 40.0% | +4.4 | -0.4 | 17 | +14.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | — | 1-3 | — | +3.5 | +0.6 | 17 | +14.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +24.0 | +20.5 | 24 | +20.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +2.5 | -5.2 | 7 | +0.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| NE | New England Patriots | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 0-1 | +3.0 | +0.0 |
| ARI | Arizona Cardinals | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +24.0 | +20.5 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -2.0 | -10.5 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | +7.0 | +0.0 |
| SF | San Francisco 49ers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -3.0 | -6.0 |
| DEN | Denver Broncos | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -3.0 | -5.5 |
| KC | Kansas City Chiefs | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +17.0 | +14.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 | 1-2 | 50% |
| Oct | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Sun | 5 | 3-2 | 2-2-1 | 3-2 | 50% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 4-3 | 2-3-2 | 3-4 | 40% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Turf | 4 | 3-1 | 1-1-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Same conference | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 4 | 3-1 | 1-1-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | U | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 2 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
| After a loss | 3 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 | 1-2 | 50% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 50% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 6 | 3-3 | 1-3-2 | 3-3 | 25% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 4 | 3-1 | 1-1-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 4 | 3-1 | 1-1-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 3 | 1-2 | 0-2-1 | 3-0 | 0% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals (ARI) | 3-5 | 0.551 #8 | 20.3 | 29.7 | 11.61 | -68.85 |
| Los Angeles Rams (LAR) | 4-4 | 0.529 #10 | 24.3 | 22.7 | 59.47 | -2.19 |
| Seattle Seahawks (SEA) | 4-3 | 0.526 #11 | 24.0 | 17.9 | 3.18 | 33.65 |
| San Francisco 49ers (SF) | 6-1 | 0.439 #27 | 28.1 | 19.9 | 84.74 | -0.02 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 Seattle Seahawks rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive pass yards allowed per play (1st of 32), defensive pass yards allowed per play (1st of 32), and defensive yards allowed per play (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg wr separation allowed (29th of 32), offensive epa per rush (29th of 32), and offensive epa per rush (29th of 32).