Buffalo Bills
Showing the 2025 season — the most recent with complete stats. 2026 appears here as its weeks complete.
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 481 | 391.22 | +89.78 | #4 |
| Total Yards | 6397 | 5,552.97 | +844.03 | #4 |
| Yds / Play | 5.90 | 5.33 | +0.58 | #4 |
| 1st Downs | 374 | 328.63 | +45.38 | #4 |
| Turnovers | 19 | 19.66 | -0.66 | #16 |
| Fumbles Lost | 9 | 7.78 | +1.22 | #23 |
| EXP Pts | 186.79 | 58.31 | +128.48 | #3 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 365 | 391.22 | -26.22 | #12 |
| Total Yards | 4983 | 5,552.97 | -569.97 | #7 |
| Yds / Play | 5.20 | 5.33 | -0.13 | #15 |
| 1st Downs | 300 | 328.63 | -28.63 | #7 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 19.66 | +0.34 | #16 |
| Fumbles Lost | 7 | 7.78 | -0.78 | #19 |
| EXP Pts | -33.70 | -58.31 | +24.61 | #13 |
Scoring Composition
Where Buffalo Bills's points come from. Total = 481 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 174 | 177.88 | -3.88 | #23 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.30 | 6.05 | +0.25 | #7 |
| Yds / Drive | 36.70 | 31.19 | +5.51 | #4 |
| Points / Drive | 2.70 | 2.11 | +0.59 | #2 |
| Score % | 44.80 | 39.55 | +5.25 | #7 |
| Turnover % | 10.30 | 10.49 | -0.19 | #16 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 547 | 456.28 | +90.72 | #1 |
| Rush Yds | 2714 | 1,988.06 | +725.94 | #1 |
| Rush Y/A | 5 | 4.34 | +0.66 | #2 |
| Rush TD | 30 | 15.94 | +14.06 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 50.22 | 11.49 | +38.73 | #3 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 495 | 544.97 | -49.97 | #25 |
| Pass Cmp | 344 | 350.53 | -6.53 | #16 |
| Cmp % | 69.50 | 64.35 | +5.15 | #2 |
| Pass Yds | 3683 | 3,564.91 | +118.09 | #15 |
| Yds / Att | 7.40 | 6.56 | +0.84 | #4 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.70 | 10.16 | +0.54 | #13 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.70 | 6.49 | +1.21 | #5 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.10 | 6.05 | +1.05 | #6 |
| Pass TD | 29 | 25.34 | +3.66 | #8 |
| TD % | 5.90 | 4.66 | +1.24 | #4 |
| Pass Int | 10 | 11.88 | -1.88 | #12 |
| Int % | 2 | 2.21 | -0.21 | #17 |
| Sack % | 7.50 | 6.91 | +0.59 | #21 |
| Pass Rating | 102.10 | 89.31 | +12.79 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 152.18 | 60.56 | +91.62 | #6 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 210 | 214.38 | -4.38 | #18 |
| 3rd Down Made | 94 | 84.69 | +9.31 | #7 |
| 4th Down Att | 32 | 27.69 | +4.31 | #7 |
| 4th Down Made | 19 | 15.28 | +3.72 | #5 |
| Red Zone Att | 65 | 54.41 | +10.59 | #5 |
| Red Zone Scores | 43 | 31.16 | +11.84 | #2 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 177 | 177.88 | -0.88 | #16 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.50 | 6.05 | -0.55 | #3 |
| Yds / Drive | 28 | 31.21 | -3.21 | #8 |
| Points / Drive | 2.09 | 2.12 | -0.02 | #13 |
| Score % | 37.30 | 39.58 | -2.28 | #11 |
| Turnover % | 11.30 | 10.46 | +0.84 | #13 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 450 | 456.28 | -6.28 | #14 |
| Rush Yds | 2315 | 1,988.06 | +326.94 | #28 |
| Rush Y/A | 5.10 | 4.35 | +0.75 | #30 |
| Rush TD | 24 | 15.94 | +8.06 | #32 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -73.51 | -11.49 | -62.02 | #31 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 464 | 544.97 | -80.97 | #31 |
| Pass Cmp | 277 | 350.53 | -73.53 | #1 |
| Cmp % | 59.70 | 64.33 | -4.63 | #4 |
| Pass Yds | 2668 | 3,564.91 | -896.91 | #1 |
| Yds / Att | 6.20 | 7.02 | -0.82 | #4 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.40 | 10.92 | -0.52 | #8 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.80 | 6.98 | -1.18 | #5 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.90 | 6.06 | -1.16 | #6 |
| Pass TD | 19 | 25.34 | -6.34 | #6 |
| TD % | 4.10 | 4.66 | -0.56 | #12 |
| Pass Int | 13 | 12.26 | +0.74 | #11 |
| Int % | 2.80 | 2.24 | +0.56 | #8 |
| Sack % | 7.20 | 6.91 | +0.29 | #13 |
| Pass Rating | 79.80 | 91.44 | -11.64 | #7 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 26.43 | -60.56 | +86.99 | #3 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 203 | 214.38 | -11.38 | #8 |
| 3rd Down Made | 84 | 84.69 | -0.69 | #18 |
| 4th Down Att | 19 | 27.69 | -8.69 | #3 |
| 4th Down Made | 10 | 15.28 | -5.28 | #5 |
| Red Zone Att | 47 | 54.41 | -7.41 | #7 |
| Red Zone Scores | 28 | 31.16 | -3.16 | #14 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for BUF 2025. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — BUF 2025
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% |
| 40-49 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for BUF 2025.
Pressure & Tackles — BUF 2025
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for BUF 2025. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — BUF 2025
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for BUF 2025 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — BUF 2025
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for BUF 2025. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — BUF 2025
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2025 vs 2024.
| All Purpose Yds | 7290 | 8882 | 1592 |
| Kick Ret Yds | 621 | 1842 | 1221 |
| Rush Yds | 2230 | 2714 | 484 |
5-Year Trajectory
BUF Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2021 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2021 | 151.1 | 78.3 | +229.4 |
| 2022 | 156.4 | 10.9 | +167.3 |
| 2023 | 167.0 | 15.2 | +182.2 |
| 2024 | 221.4 | -51.4 | +170.0 |
| 2025 | 186.8 | -33.7 | +153.1 |
Last game — Week 18, 2025
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for BUF 2025.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. BUF has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 12-5 | 8-9 | 47.1% | 9-8 | 52.9% | +6.8 | +0.6 | 31 | +24.0 |
| Home | 9 | 7-2 | 4-5 | 44.4% | 6-3 | 66.7% | +7.8 | +1.2 | 27 | +14.5 |
| Away | 8 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 37.5% | +5.8 | -0.1 | 31 | +24.0 |
| As favorite | 15 | 10-5 | 6-9 | 40.0% | 8-7 | 53.3% | +7.2 | -0.1 | 31 | +24.0 |
| As underdog | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | — | 1-1 | — | +4.0 | +6.0 | 7 | +9.5 |
| Division games | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 3-3 | 50.0% | +6.8 | -1.4 | 27 | +14.5 |
| Non-division | 11 | 8-3 | 5-6 | 45.5% | 6-5 | 54.5% | +6.8 | +1.7 | 31 | +24.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 5 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 80.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | +6.0 | +5.1 | 19 | +16.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 40.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | +4.6 | -0.8 | 20 | +14.0 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 7 | 5-2 | 2-5 | 28.6% | 5-2 | 71.4% | +9.0 | -1.6 | 31 | +24.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2025. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| NYJ | New York Jets | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +23.5 | +14.2 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 1-1 | -3.5 | -14.0 |
| NE | New England Patriots | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | +0.5 | -4.5 |
| BAL | Baltimore Ravens | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +1.0 | +2.5 |
| NO | New Orleans Saints | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +12.0 | -3.5 |
| ATL | Atlanta Falcons | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -10.0 | -13.5 |
| CAR | Carolina Panthers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +31.0 | +24.0 |
| KC | Kansas City Chiefs | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +7.0 | +9.5 |
| TB | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +12.0 | +6.0 |
| HOU | Houston Texans | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -4.0 | -9.5 |
| PIT | Pittsburgh Steelers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +19.0 | +16.0 |
| CIN | Cincinnati Bengals | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +5.0 | -1.0 |
| CLE | Cleveland Browns | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +3.0 | -7.5 |
| PHI | Philadelphia Eagles | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -1.0 | -4.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 50% |
| Oct | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Nov | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 60% |
| Dec | 4 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 25% |
| Jan | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Sun | 14 | 11-3 | 8-6 | 8-6 | 57% |
| Mon | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 50% |
| Second half (W10+) | 9 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 5-4 | 44% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Turf | 13 | 9-4 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 46% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| Same conference | 6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 40% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold (<40°F) | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 57% |
| Cool (40-59°F) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 4 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 25% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Indoor | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 10 | 8-2 | 5-5 | 7-3 | 50% |
| Windy (≥15 mph) | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Indoor | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 4 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 2 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 4 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 11 | 7-4 | 3-8 | 5-6 | 27% |
| After a loss | 5 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 80% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 7 | 4-3 | 1-6 | 4-3 | 14% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 6 | 5-1 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 83% |
| vs losing opp. | 7 | 6-1 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 29% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 15 | 12-3 | 8-7 | 9-6 | 53% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 9 | 7-2 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 44% |
| Domestic road | 8 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 50% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 9 | 7-2 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 44% |
| Short (<500) | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 25% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 10 | 7-3 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Bills (BUF) | 12-5 | 0.471 #27 | 28.3 | 21.5 | 186.79 | -33.70 |
| Miami Dolphins (MIA) | 7-10 | 0.488 #22 | 20.4 | 24.9 | 17.51 | -121.82 |
| New England Patriots (NE) | 14-3 | 0.391 #32 | 28.8 | 18.8 | 195.86 | 2.74 |
| New York Jets (NYJ) | 3-14 | 0.552 #3 | 17.6 | 29.6 | -104.52 | -176.95 |
Insights
A look at how the 2025 Buffalo Bills ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg yac allowed (1st of 32), defensive yac over expected allowed (1st of 32), and offensive epa per rush (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive ryoe per attempt allowed (32nd of 32), defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (31st of 32), and defensive avg time to pressure (30th of 32).
Rivalries
- Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins have met 16 times in the regular season. Buffalo Bills leads the series 13 to 3. The most lopsided meeting was a 35-point win for Buffalo Bills in 2021.
- Buffalo Bills and New England Patriots have met 16 times in the regular season. The series is even at 8 apiece. The most lopsided meeting was a 29-point win for Buffalo Bills in 2020.
- Buffalo Bills and New York Jets have met 16 times in the regular season. Buffalo Bills leads the series 12 to 4. The most lopsided meeting was a 31-point win for Buffalo Bills in 2018.