Washington Commanders
Showing the 2025 season — the most recent with complete stats. 2026 appears here as its weeks complete.
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 356 | 391.22 | -35.22 | #22 |
| Total Yards | 5419 | 5,552.97 | -133.97 | #22 |
| Yds / Play | 5.50 | 5.33 | +0.18 | #12 |
| 1st Downs | 323 | 328.63 | -5.63 | #21 |
| Turnovers | 23 | 19.66 | +3.34 | #21 |
| Fumbles Lost | 11 | 7.78 | +3.22 | #27 |
| EXP Pts | 54.87 | 58.31 | -3.44 | #18 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 451 | 391.22 | +59.78 | #27 |
| Total Yards | 6533 | 5,552.97 | +980.03 | #32 |
| Yds / Play | 6 | 5.33 | +0.67 | #29 |
| 1st Downs | 376 | 328.63 | +47.38 | #31 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 19.66 | -9.66 | #31 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 7.78 | -5.78 | #32 |
| EXP Pts | -192.14 | -58.31 | -133.83 | #31 |
Scoring Composition
Where Washington Commanders's points come from. Total = 356 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 165 | 177.88 | -12.88 | #32 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.10 | 6.05 | +0.05 | #17 |
| Yds / Drive | 32.30 | 31.19 | +1.11 | #15 |
| Points / Drive | 2.03 | 2.11 | -0.08 | #20 |
| Score % | 37 | 39.55 | -2.55 | #22 |
| Turnover % | 12.70 | 10.49 | +2.21 | #25 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 484 | 456.28 | +27.72 | #9 |
| Rush Yds | 2290 | 1,988.06 | +301.94 | #4 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.70 | 4.34 | +0.36 | #5 |
| Rush TD | 20 | 15.94 | +4.06 | #8 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 20.37 | 11.49 | +8.88 | #12 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 469 | 544.97 | -75.97 | #31 |
| Pass Cmp | 287 | 350.53 | -63.53 | #31 |
| Cmp % | 61.20 | 64.35 | -3.15 | #26 |
| Pass Yds | 3129 | 3,564.91 | -435.91 | #24 |
| Yds / Att | 6.70 | 6.56 | +0.14 | #13 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.90 | 10.16 | +0.74 | #8 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.30 | 6.49 | -0.19 | #19 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.90 | 6.05 | -0.15 | #21 |
| Pass TD | 19 | 25.34 | -6.34 | #28 |
| TD % | 4.10 | 4.66 | -0.56 | #23 |
| Pass Int | 12 | 11.88 | +0.13 | #17 |
| Int % | 2.60 | 2.21 | +0.39 | #22 |
| Sack % | 7.30 | 6.91 | +0.39 | #18 |
| Pass Rating | 83.70 | 89.31 | -5.61 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 65.82 | 60.56 | +5.26 | #15 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 189 | 214.38 | -25.38 | #32 |
| 3rd Down Made | 71 | 84.69 | -13.69 | #29 |
| 4th Down Att | 26 | 27.69 | -1.69 | #19 |
| 4th Down Made | 16 | 15.28 | +0.72 | #13 |
| Red Zone Att | 46 | 54.41 | -8.41 | #25 |
| Red Zone Scores | 30 | 31.16 | -1.16 | #19 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 169 | 177.88 | -8.88 | #5 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.60 | 6.05 | +0.55 | #30 |
| Yds / Drive | 38.60 | 31.21 | +7.39 | #32 |
| Points / Drive | 2.63 | 2.12 | +0.52 | #30 |
| Score % | 47.30 | 39.58 | +7.72 | #29 |
| Turnover % | 5.30 | 10.46 | -5.16 | #31 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 504 | 456.28 | +47.72 | #28 |
| Rush Yds | 2411 | 1,988.06 | +422.94 | #30 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.80 | 4.35 | +0.45 | #27 |
| Rush TD | 18 | 15.94 | +2.06 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -56.70 | -11.49 | -45.21 | #30 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 540 | 544.97 | -4.97 | #16 |
| Pass Cmp | 350 | 350.53 | -0.53 | #15 |
| Cmp % | 64.80 | 64.33 | +0.47 | #17 |
| Pass Yds | 4122 | 3,564.91 | +557.09 | #28 |
| Yds / Att | 8.10 | 7.02 | +1.08 | #30 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12.50 | 10.92 | +1.58 | #32 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.70 | 6.98 | +1.72 | #29 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.60 | 6.06 | +1.54 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 33 | 25.34 | +7.66 | #29 |
| TD % | 6.10 | 4.66 | +1.44 | #29 |
| Pass Int | 8 | 12.26 | -4.26 | #27 |
| Int % | 1.50 | 2.24 | -0.74 | #27 |
| Sack % | 7.20 | 6.91 | +0.29 | #15 |
| Pass Rating | 104 | 91.44 | +12.56 | #28 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -149.37 | -60.56 | -88.81 | #30 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 213 | 214.38 | -1.38 | #15 |
| 3rd Down Made | 88 | 84.69 | +3.31 | #22 |
| 4th Down Att | 32 | 27.69 | +4.31 | #24 |
| 4th Down Made | 20 | 15.28 | +4.72 | #25 |
| Red Zone Att | 62 | 54.41 | +7.59 | #24 |
| Red Zone Scores | 42 | 31.16 | +10.84 | #29 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for WAS 2025. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — WAS 2025
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% |
| 30-39 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% |
| 40-49 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for WAS 2025.
Pressure & Tackles — WAS 2025
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for WAS 2025. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — WAS 2025
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for WAS 2025 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — WAS 2025
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for WAS 2025. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — WAS 2025
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2025 vs 2024.
| Kick Ret Yds | 1082 | 1918 | 836 |
| Punt Net Yds | 2145 | 2457 | 312 |
| Punt Yds | 2343 | 2651 | 308 |
5-Year Trajectory
WAS Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2021 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2021 | 15.8 | -125.4 | -109.6 |
| 2022 | -24.3 | 7.3 | -17.0 |
| 2023 | -30.0 | -148.3 | -178.3 |
| 2024 | 206.9 | -91.5 | +115.4 |
| 2025 | 54.9 | -192.1 | -137.3 |
Last game — Week 18, 2025
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for WAS 2025.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. WAS has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 5-12 | 7-10 | 41.2% | 10-7 | 58.8% | -5.6 | -2.9 | 17 | +19.5 |
| Home | 8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 50.0% | 6-2 | 75.0% | -4.2 | -1.9 | 17 | +14.5 |
| Away | 9 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 33.3% | 4-5 | 44.4% | -6.8 | -3.8 | 17 | +19.5 |
| As favorite | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | — | 1-3 | — | +0.0 | -3.9 | 17 | +14.5 |
| As underdog | 13 | 3-10 | 5-8 | 38.5% | 9-4 | 69.2% | -7.3 | -2.6 | 17 | +19.5 |
| Division games | 6 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 5-1 | 83.3% | -1.7 | +1.1 | 15 | +10.5 |
| Non-division | 11 | 2-9 | 3-8 | 27.3% | 5-6 | 45.5% | -7.7 | -5.0 | 17 | +19.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 9 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 44.4% | 6-3 | 66.7% | -4.2 | -2.8 | 17 | +19.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | +7.0 | +1.2 | 15 | +9.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -5.0 | +0.0 | — | +5.5 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 4 | 0-4 | 1-3 | — | 3-1 | — | -15.2 | -6.6 | — | +1.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2025. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| NYG | New York Giants | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +11.5 | +9.8 |
| DAL | Dallas Cowboys | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | -14.5 | -9.5 |
| PHI | Philadelphia Eagles | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | -2.0 | +3.0 |
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -9.0 | -5.5 |
| LV | Las Vegas Raiders | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +17.0 | +14.5 |
| ATL | Atlanta Falcons | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -7.0 | -4.5 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +17.0 | +19.5 |
| CHI | Chicago Bears | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -1.0 | -6.5 |
| KC | Kansas City Chiefs | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -21.0 | -10.5 |
| SEA | Seattle Seahawks | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -24.0 | -21.5 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -22.0 | -13.5 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -3.0 | -0.5 |
| DEN | Denver Broncos | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | -1.0 | +5.5 |
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -31.0 | -32.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Oct | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 25% |
| Nov | 4 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 25% |
| Dec | 4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 50% |
| Jan | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Sat | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Sun | 12 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 8-4 | 50% |
| Mon | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 9 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 33% |
| Second half (W10+) | 8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 50% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 12 | 3-9 | 5-7 | 7-5 | 42% |
| Turf | 5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 40% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 5-1 | 67% |
| Same conference | 6 | 0-6 | 0-6 | 3-3 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 60% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold (<40°F) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
| Cool (40-59°F) | 6 | 0-6 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 33% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Indoor | 5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 20% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 11 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 7-4 | 55% |
| Indoor | 5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 20% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 2 |
| O/U | O | 4 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 1 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 8 |
| Longest ATS cover | 2 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 6 |
| Longest O streak | 4 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0% |
| After a loss | 12 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 8-4 | 50% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 8 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 38% |
| vs winning opp. | 8 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 38% |
| vs losing opp. | 6 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 33% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 12 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 8-4 | 50% |
| Dome | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Retractable (closed) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 8 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 38% |
| International | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 50% |
| Short (<500) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 5 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 0% |
| Long (1500+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 10 | 2-8 | 3-7 | 7-3 | 30% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas Cowboys (DAL) | 7-9-1 | 0.438 #30 | 27.7 | 30.1 | 180.41 | -210.14 |
| New York Giants (NYG) | 4-13 | 0.524 #8 | 22.4 | 25.8 | 75.75 | -142.98 |
| Philadelphia Eagles (PHI) | 11-6 | 0.476 #26 | 22.3 | 19.1 | 66.63 | -7.60 |
| Washington Commanders (WAS) | 5-12 | 0.507 #14 | 20.9 | 26.5 | 54.87 | -192.14 |
Insights
A look at how the 2025 Washington Commanders ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (3rd of 32), defensive stuffed rate forced (4th of 32), and offensive rush yards per carry (5th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg yac allowed (31st of 32), defensive epa per play allowed (31st of 32), and defensive pass yards allowed per play (31st of 32).
Rivalries
- Dallas Cowboys and Washington Commanders have met 16 times in the regular season. Dallas Cowboys leads the series 11 to 5. The most lopsided meeting was a 42-point win for Dallas Cowboys in 2021.
- New York Giants and Washington Commanders have met 16 times in the regular season. New York Giants leads the series 8 to 7, with 1 tie. The most lopsided meeting was a 24-point win for New York Giants in 2018.
- Philadelphia Eagles and Washington Commanders have met 16 times in the regular season. Philadelphia Eagles leads the series 11 to 5. The most lopsided meeting was a 24-point win for Philadelphia Eagles in 2018.