Los Angeles Chargers
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 28 | 44.94 | -16.94 | #29 |
| Total Yards | 578 | 651.56 | -73.56 | #22 |
| Yds / Play | 5.10 | 5.36 | -0.26 | #18 |
| 1st Downs | 34 | 38.38 | -4.38 | #22 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 2.43 | +2.57 | #29 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 1 | +1 | #26 |
| EXP Pts | -11.93 | 6.35 | -18.28 | #30 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 28 | 44.94 | -16.94 | #4 |
| Total Yards | 578 | 651.56 | -73.56 | #11 |
| Yds / Play | 5.10 | 5.36 | -0.26 | #15 |
| 1st Downs | 34 | 38.38 | -4.38 | #11 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 2.43 | +2.57 | #2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 1 | +1 | #7 |
Scoring Composition
Where Los Angeles Chargers's points come from. Total = 28 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 23 | 21.22 | +1.78 | #10 |
| Plays / Drive | 5 | 5.93 | -0.93 | #31 |
| Yds / Drive | 25 | 30.70 | -5.70 | #28 |
| Points / Drive | 1.22 | 2.09 | -0.87 | #29 |
| Score % | 17.40 | 38.59 | -21.19 | #30 |
| Turnover % | 21.70 | 10.26 | +11.44 | #29 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 53 | 54.06 | -1.06 | #18 |
| Rush Yds | 208 | 225.34 | -17.34 | #19 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.90 | 4.12 | -0.22 | #17 |
| Rush TD | 2 | 1.75 | +0.25 | #11 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -16.54 | -1.33 | -15.21 | #31 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 54 | 62.94 | -8.94 | #26 |
| Pass Cmp | 32 | 41 | -9 | #28 |
| Cmp % | 59.30 | 65.32 | -6.02 | #27 |
| Pass Yds | 370 | 426.22 | -56.22 | #21 |
| Yds / Att | 7.40 | 7.27 | +0.13 | #13 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12.50 | 11.17 | +1.33 | #7 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.70 | 7.31 | -1.61 | #27 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.60 | 6.40 | -1.80 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 2 | 3.16 | -1.16 | #25 |
| TD % | 3.70 | 5.06 | -1.36 | #19 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 1.64 | +1.36 | #22 |
| Int % | 5.60 | 2.76 | +2.84 | #23 |
| Sack % | 10 | 7.20 | +2.80 | #26 |
| Pass Rating | 71.60 | 94.62 | -23.02 | #29 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 5.48 | 9.36 | -3.88 | #19 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 22 | 25.16 | -3.16 | #26 |
| 3rd Down Made | 7 | 10.09 | -3.09 | #26 |
| 4th Down Att | 3 | 2.22 | +0.78 | #11 |
| 4th Down Made | 0 | 1.16 | -1.16 | #30 |
| Red Zone Att | 5 | 6.31 | -1.31 | #25 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 3.84 | +0.16 | #14 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 23 | 21.22 | +1.78 | #23 |
| Plays / Drive | 5 | 5.93 | -0.93 | #2 |
| Yds / Drive | 25 | 30.70 | -5.70 | #5 |
| Points / Drive | 1.22 | 2.09 | -0.87 | #4 |
| Score % | 17.40 | 38.59 | -21.19 | #3 |
| Turnover % | 21.70 | 10.26 | +11.44 | #4 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 53 | 54.06 | -1.06 | #15 |
| Rush Yds | 208 | 225.34 | -17.34 | #14 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.90 | 4.12 | -0.22 | #16 |
| Rush TD | 2 | 1.75 | +0.25 | #22 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 54 | 62.94 | -8.94 | #26 |
| Pass Cmp | 32 | 41 | -9 | #5 |
| Cmp % | 59.30 | 65.32 | -6.02 | #6 |
| Pass Yds | 370 | 426.22 | -56.22 | #12 |
| Yds / Att | 7.40 | 7.27 | +0.13 | #20 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12.50 | 11.17 | +1.33 | #26 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.70 | 7.31 | -1.61 | #6 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.60 | 6.40 | -1.80 | #4 |
| Pass TD | 2 | 3.16 | -1.16 | #8 |
| TD % | 3.70 | 5.06 | -1.36 | #14 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 1.64 | +1.36 | #4 |
| Int % | 5.60 | 2.76 | +2.84 | #3 |
| Sack % | 10 | 7.20 | +2.80 | #6 |
| Pass Rating | 71.60 | 94.62 | -23.02 | #4 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 22 | 25.16 | -3.16 | #7 |
| 3rd Down Made | 7 | 10.09 | -3.09 | #7 |
| 4th Down Att | 3 | 2.22 | +0.78 | #22 |
| 4th Down Made | 0 | 1.16 | -1.16 | #3 |
| Red Zone Att | 5 | 6.31 | -1.31 | #8 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 3.84 | +0.16 | #19 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for LAC 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special-teams data not available for this team-year.
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for LAC 2026.
Defense pressure data not available for this team-year.
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for LAC 2026. Higher = better.
EPA data not available for this team-year.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for LAC 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air yards data not available for this team-year.
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for LAC 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline data not available for this team-year.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 787 | 109 | -678 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 345 | 31 | -314 |
| Penalties | 104 | 15 | -89 |
5-Year Trajectory
LAC Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 72.5 | -81.4 | -9.0 |
| 2023 | -5.4 | -92.7 | -98.0 |
| 2024 | 105.1 | -11.7 | +93.4 |
| 2025 | 31.9 | 3.5 | +35.4 |
Last game — Week 2, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for LAC 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs ARI | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs LV | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. LAC has 2 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -12.0 | -19.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Home | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -12.0 | -19.5 | — | -18.5 |
| As favorite | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -12.0 | -19.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -18.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Non-division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -20.5 | — | -20.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -18.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -20.5 | — | -20.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turf | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 2 |
| ATS | L | 2 |
| O/U | U | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 0 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 0 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 0 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a loss | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver Broncos (DEN) | 1-1 | 0.750 #13 | 15.0 | 15.0 | -9.28 | -9.28 |
| Kansas City Chiefs (KC) | 2-0 | 0.250 #29 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 27.24 | 27.24 |
| Los Angeles Chargers (LAC) | 0-2 | 0.750 #10 | 14.0 | 14.0 | -11.93 | -11.93 |
| Las Vegas Raiders (LV) | 2-0 | 0.000 #31 | 26.5 | 26.5 | -1.19 | -1.19 |
Insights
As of week 2, how the 2026 Los Angeles Chargers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive rush yards allowed per carry (1st of 32), defensive rush yards allowed per carry (1st of 32), and offensive yards after contact per carry (1st of 32). Weaknesses: offensive epa per rush (31st of 32), offensive epa per rush (31st of 32), and offensive yards before contact per carry (31st of 32).