Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 90 | 153.94 | -63.94 | #32 |
| Total Yards | 1723 | 2,223.56 | -500.56 | #31 |
| Yds / Play | 4.60 | 5.35 | -0.75 | #29 |
| 1st Downs | 103 | 132.25 | -29.25 | #30 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 8.19 | +6.81 | #32 |
| Fumbles Lost | 7 | 3.63 | +3.38 | #32 |
| EXP Pts | -46.24 | 22.12 | -68.36 | #32 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 151 | 153.94 | -2.94 | #15 |
| Total Yards | 1980 | 2,223.56 | -243.56 | #4 |
| Yds / Play | 5.40 | 5.34 | +0.06 | #16 |
| 1st Downs | 118 | 132.25 | -14.25 | #5 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 8.19 | +1.81 | #10 |
| Fumbles Lost | 5 | 3.63 | +1.38 | #7 |
| EXP Pts | -3.66 | -22.12 | +18.46 | #11 |
Scoring Composition
Where Los Angeles Chargers's points come from. Total = 90 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 71 | 71.16 | -0.16 | #19 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.40 | 6.00 | -0.60 | #31 |
| Yds / Drive | 24.20 | 30.97 | -6.77 | #30 |
| Points / Drive | 1.27 | 2.12 | -0.85 | #32 |
| Score % | 25.40 | 39.59 | -14.19 | #32 |
| Turnover % | 19.70 | 10.59 | +9.11 | #32 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 169 | 178.38 | -9.38 | #20 |
| Rush Yds | 714 | 746.31 | -32.31 | #18 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.20 | 4.17 | +0.03 | #14 |
| Rush TD | 4 | 6.38 | -2.38 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -19.74 | -2.85 | -16.89 | #29 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 181 | 223.28 | -42.28 | #29 |
| Pass Cmp | 107 | 143.16 | -36.16 | #30 |
| Cmp % | 59.10 | 64.09 | -4.99 | #30 |
| Pass Yds | 1009 | 1,477.25 | -468.25 | #30 |
| Yds / Att | 6.30 | 7.07 | -0.77 | #25 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.70 | 11.03 | -0.33 | #19 |
| Adj Y/A | 4.90 | 7.06 | -2.16 | #30 |
| Adj NY/A | 3.70 | 6.21 | -2.51 | #32 |
| Pass TD | 5 | 10.22 | -5.22 | #29 |
| TD % | 2.80 | 4.57 | -1.77 | #29 |
| Pass Int | 8 | 4.71 | +3.29 | #31 |
| Int % | 4.40 | 2.12 | +2.28 | #31 |
| Sack % | 10.40 | 6.41 | +3.99 | #31 |
| Pass Rating | 68.40 | 91.61 | -23.21 | #32 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -20.54 | 30.50 | -51.04 | #29 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 82 | 86.19 | -4.19 | #22 |
| 3rd Down Made | 28 | 34.34 | -6.34 | #30 |
| 4th Down Att | 11 | 9.50 | +1.50 | #11 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 5.09 | -3.09 | #31 |
| Red Zone Att | 16 | 22.06 | -6.06 | #29 |
| Red Zone Scores | 8 | 13.09 | -5.09 | #30 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 71 | 71.16 | -0.16 | #12 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.30 | 6.01 | -0.71 | #3 |
| Yds / Drive | 27.40 | 30.98 | -3.58 | #4 |
| Points / Drive | 2.03 | 2.11 | -0.08 | #14 |
| Score % | 39.40 | 39.47 | -0.07 | #17 |
| Turnover % | 12.70 | 10.67 | +2.03 | #9 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 185 | 178.38 | +6.63 | #21 |
| Rush Yds | 743 | 746.31 | -3.31 | #18 |
| Rush Y/A | 4 | 4.16 | -0.16 | #15 |
| Rush TD | 9 | 6.38 | +2.63 | #26 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 15.87 | 2.85 | +13.02 | #3 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 171 | 223.28 | -52.28 | #32 |
| Pass Cmp | 114 | 143.16 | -29.16 | #2 |
| Cmp % | 66.70 | 64.15 | +2.55 | #27 |
| Pass Yds | 1237 | 1,477.25 | -240.25 | #4 |
| Yds / Att | 7.60 | 7.07 | +0.53 | #25 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.40 | 11.02 | +0.38 | #23 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.10 | 7.06 | +0.04 | #14 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.30 | 6.21 | +0.09 | #16 |
| Pass TD | 7 | 10.22 | -3.22 | #6 |
| TD % | 4.10 | 4.61 | -0.51 | #16 |
| Pass Int | 5 | 4.56 | +0.44 | #12 |
| Int % | 2.90 | 2.07 | +0.83 | #6 |
| Sack % | 6 | 6.28 | -0.28 | #19 |
| Pass Rating | 90.70 | 91.71 | -1.01 | #14 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -25.75 | -30.50 | +4.75 | #14 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 74 | 86.19 | -12.19 | #4 |
| 3rd Down Made | 23 | 34.34 | -11.34 | #3 |
| 4th Down Att | 6 | 9.50 | -3.50 | #5 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 5.09 | -1.09 | #12 |
| Red Zone Att | 25 | 22.06 | +2.94 | #22 |
| Red Zone Scores | 12 | 13.09 | -1.09 | #14 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for LAC 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — LAC 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
| 50-59 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for LAC 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — LAC 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for LAC 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — LAC 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for LAC 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — LAC 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for LAC 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — LAC 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 787 | 441 | -346 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 345 | 132 | -213 |
| Penalties | 104 | 54 | -50 |
5-Year Trajectory
LAC Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 72.5 | -81.4 | -9.0 |
| 2023 | -5.4 | -92.7 | -98.0 |
| 2024 | 105.1 | -11.7 | +93.4 |
| 2025 | 31.9 | 3.5 | +35.4 |
| 2026 | -46.2 | -3.7 | -49.9 |
Last game — Week 8, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for LAC 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs ARI | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs LV | L | 14-26 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ BUF | L | 16-24 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ SEA | L | 23-30 | P | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs DEN | L | 17-23 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | @ KC | L | 6-22 | L | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | @ LAR | L | 9-24 | L | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. LAC has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 0-7 | 0-6-1 | 0.0% | 1-6 | 14.3% | -10.9 | -8.5 | — | +0.0 |
| Home | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | — | 0-3 | — | -10.0 | -13.8 | — | -2.5 |
| Away | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | — | 1-3 | — | -11.5 | -4.5 | — | +0.0 |
| As favorite | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -12.0 | -19.5 | — | -18.5 |
| As underdog | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 0.0% | 1-4 | 20.0% | -10.4 | -4.1 | — | +0.0 |
| Division games | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | — | 0-3 | — | -11.3 | -9.8 | — | -2.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | — | 1-3 | — | -10.5 | -7.5 | — | +0.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -18.5 | — | -18.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -12.0 | -20.5 | — | -20.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 0-2 | — | -10.5 | -5.5 | — | -2.5 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | -10.3 | -3.2 | — | +0.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| ARI | Arizona Cardinals | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -12.0 | -20.5 |
| LV | Las Vegas Raiders | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -12.0 | -18.5 |
| BUF | Buffalo Bills | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -8.0 | -1.0 |
| SEA | Seattle Seahawks | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | -7.0 | +0.0 |
| DEN | Denver Broncos | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -6.0 | -2.5 |
| KC | Kansas City Chiefs | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -16.0 | -8.5 |
| LAR | Los Angeles Rams | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -15.0 | -8.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Oct | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
| Nov | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 7 | 0-7 | 0-6-1 | 1-6 | 0% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 0-7 | 0-6-1 | 1-6 | 0% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
| Turf | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 1-4 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Same conference | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 7 |
| ATS | L | 3 |
| O/U | U | 3 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 0 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 7 |
| Longest ATS cover | 0 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 3 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 3 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a loss | 6 | 0-6 | 0-5-1 | 1-5 | 0% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 1-4 | 0% |
| vs winning opp. | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 1-3 | 0% |
| vs losing opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
| Retractable (closed) | 4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 1-3 | 0% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 5 | 0-5 | 0-4-1 | 1-4 | 0% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver Broncos (DEN) | 6-2 | 0.556 #7 | 20.6 | 20.1 | -10.01 | -2.81 |
| Kansas City Chiefs (KC) | 5-2 | 0.423 #29 | 23.8 | 17.2 | 49.58 | 5.15 |
| Los Angeles Chargers (LAC) | 0-7 | 0.610 #3 | 15.0 | 25.2 | -46.24 | -3.66 |
| Las Vegas Raiders (LV) | 4-4 | 0.422 #30 | 26.1 | 28.1 | 32.10 | -53.91 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 Los Angeles Chargers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (3rd of 32), defensive avg yac allowed (4th of 32), and defensive epa per rush allowed (8th of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg yards after catch (32nd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (32nd of 32).