Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 164 | 115.13 | +48.88 | #2 |
| Total Yards | 1969 | 1,639.66 | +329.34 | #4 |
| Yds / Play | 5.90 | 5.36 | +0.54 | #7 |
| 1st Downs | 122 | 97.13 | +24.88 | #2 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 6.28 | -5.28 | #1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2.88 | -1.88 | #6 |
| EXP Pts | 76.84 | 15.60 | +61.24 | #2 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 148 | 115.13 | +32.88 | #29 |
| Total Yards | 2022 | 1,639.66 | +382.34 | #32 |
| Yds / Play | 5.60 | 5.36 | +0.24 | #23 |
| 1st Downs | 133 | 97.13 | +35.88 | #32 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 6.28 | -1.28 | #23 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 2.88 | -0.88 | #23 |
| EXP Pts | -80.48 | -15.60 | -64.88 | #32 |
Scoring Composition
Where Detroit Lions's points come from. Total = 164 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 53 | 52.75 | +0.25 | #17 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.40 | 5.92 | +0.48 | #5 |
| Yds / Drive | 36.70 | 30.67 | +6.03 | #3 |
| Points / Drive | 3.09 | 2.11 | +0.98 | #2 |
| Score % | 52.80 | 39.28 | +13.53 | #2 |
| Turnover % | 1.90 | 11.00 | -9.10 | #1 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 130 | 131.84 | -1.84 | #17 |
| Rush Yds | 571 | 553.91 | +17.09 | #14 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.17 | +0.23 | #13 |
| Rush TD | 8 | 4.78 | +3.22 | #5 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 6.80 | -2.80 | +9.60 | #8 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 191 | 163.47 | +27.53 | #5 |
| Pass Cmp | 128 | 105.16 | +22.84 | #6 |
| Cmp % | 67 | 64.28 | +2.72 | #8 |
| Pass Yds | 1398 | 1,085.75 | +312.25 | #2 |
| Yds / Att | 7.80 | 7.12 | +0.68 | #10 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.60 | 11.07 | +0.53 | #12 |
| Adj Y/A | 9 | 7.11 | +1.89 | #3 |
| Adj NY/A | 8.10 | 6.24 | +1.86 | #3 |
| Pass TD | 12 | 7.69 | +4.31 | #2 |
| TD % | 6.30 | 4.71 | +1.59 | #6 |
| Sack % | 5.40 | 6.50 | -1.10 | #10 |
| Pass Rating | 111.30 | 92.21 | +19.09 | #3 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 76.89 | 22.83 | +54.06 | #1 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 59 | 63.09 | -4.09 | #24 |
| 3rd Down Made | 22 | 24.84 | -2.84 | #23 |
| 4th Down Att | 11 | 6.72 | +4.28 | #3 |
| 4th Down Made | 8 | 3.63 | +4.38 | #3 |
| Red Zone Att | 22 | 16 | +6 | #1 |
| Red Zone Scores | 17 | 9.78 | +7.22 | #1 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 54 | 52.75 | +1.25 | #20 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.80 | 5.93 | +0.87 | #32 |
| Yds / Drive | 37.50 | 30.48 | +7.02 | #31 |
| Points / Drive | 2.81 | 2.09 | +0.72 | #31 |
| Score % | 44.40 | 39.07 | +5.33 | #26 |
| Turnover % | 9.30 | 10.99 | -1.69 | #23 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 126 | 131.84 | -5.84 | #13 |
| Rush Yds | 535 | 553.91 | -18.91 | #14 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.20 | 4.19 | +0.01 | #20 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 4.78 | +1.22 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -10.84 | 2.80 | -13.64 | #29 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 213 | 163.47 | +49.53 | #1 |
| Pass Cmp | 145 | 105.16 | +39.84 | #32 |
| Cmp % | 68.10 | 64.35 | +3.75 | #28 |
| Pass Yds | 1487 | 1,085.75 | +401.25 | #32 |
| Yds / Att | 7.50 | 7.11 | +0.39 | #24 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.10 | 11.05 | +0.05 | #19 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.20 | 7.09 | +1.11 | #26 |
| Adj NY/A | 7 | 6.24 | +0.76 | #23 |
| Pass TD | 14 | 7.69 | +6.31 | #31 |
| TD % | 6.60 | 4.72 | +1.88 | #27 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 3.52 | -0.52 | #19 |
| Int % | 1.40 | 2.19 | -0.79 | #24 |
| Sack % | 8.60 | 6.34 | +2.26 | #5 |
| Pass Rating | 106.30 | 92.15 | +14.15 | #28 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -76.69 | -22.83 | -53.86 | #32 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 71 | 63.09 | +7.91 | #28 |
| 3rd Down Made | 36 | 24.84 | +11.16 | #32 |
| 4th Down Att | 8 | 6.72 | +1.28 | #20 |
| 4th Down Made | 7 | 3.63 | +3.38 | #30 |
| Red Zone Att | 21 | 16 | +5 | #29 |
| Red Zone Scores | 17 | 9.78 | +7.22 | #32 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for DET 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — DET 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for DET 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — DET 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for DET 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — DET 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for DET 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — DET 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for DET 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — DET 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 718 | 258 | -460 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 264 | 87 | -177 |
| Penalties | 104 | 35 | -69 |
5-Year Trajectory
DET Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 162.0 | -159.7 | +2.4 |
| 2023 | 145.2 | -62.6 | +82.6 |
| 2024 | 256.1 | -30.3 | +225.8 |
| 2025 | 173.5 | -78.2 | +95.3 |
| 2026 | 76.8 | -80.5 | -3.6 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for DET 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs NO | W | 31-30 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ BUF | L | 31-41 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs NYJ | W | 31-24 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ CAR | L | 26-32 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ ARI | W | 45-21 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. DET has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 3-2 | 1-3-1 | 25.0% | 5-0 | 100.0% | +3.2 | -0.5 | 24 | +18.5 |
| Home | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +4.0 | -3.0 | 7 | +0.0 |
| Away | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | — | 3-0 | — | +2.7 | +1.2 | 24 | +18.5 |
| As favorite | 4 | 3-1 | 1-2-1 | — | 4-0 | — | +6.5 | +0.5 | 24 | +18.5 |
| As underdog | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | -10.0 | -4.5 | — | -4.5 |
| Non-division | 5 | 3-2 | 1-3-1 | 25.0% | 5-0 | 100.0% | +3.2 | -0.5 | 24 | +18.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +9.0 | +4.0 | 24 | +18.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +4.0 | -3.0 | 7 | +0.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | -10.0 | -4.5 | — | -4.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 2-1 | 0-2-1 | 3-0 | 0% |
| Oct | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Sun | 4 | 3-1 | 1-2-1 | 4-0 | 33% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 3-2 | 1-3-1 | 5-0 | 25% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33% |
| Turf | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same conference | 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | O | 5 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 1 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 5 |
| Longest U streak | 0 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| After a loss | 2 | 2-0 | 1-0-1 | 2-0 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Dome | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 2-0 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Long (1500+) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | — |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 3-2 | 0.580 #7 | 23.8 | 19.2 | 29.78 | -5.98 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 3-2 | 0.420 #23 | 32.8 | 29.6 | 76.84 | -80.48 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 3-2 | 0.520 #15 | 20.8 | 22.4 | 1.81 | -7.58 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 5-0 | 0.320 #30 | 21.8 | 12.8 | -23.49 | 50.73 |
Insights
As of week 5, how the 2026 Detroit Lions rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per pass play (2nd of 32), offensive epa per pass play (2nd of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive epa per play allowed (31st of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (29th of 32), and defensive epa per pass play allowed (29th of 32).