Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 97 | 92.44 | +4.56 | #14 |
| Total Yards | 1407 | 1,329.88 | +77.13 | #11 |
| Yds / Play | 5.70 | 5.38 | +0.33 | #11 |
| 1st Downs | 83 | 79.13 | +3.88 | #13 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 4.91 | +0.09 | #20 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 2.06 | -0.06 | #19 |
| EXP Pts | 24.10 | 14.06 | +10.04 | #10 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 85 | 92.44 | -7.44 | #13 |
| Total Yards | 1390 | 1,329.88 | +60.13 | #22 |
| Yds / Play | 5.70 | 5.39 | +0.31 | #24 |
| 1st Downs | 82 | 79.13 | +2.88 | #21 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 4.91 | +0.09 | #14 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.06 | +1.94 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | -0.59 | -14.06 | +13.47 | #9 |
Scoring Composition
Where Cincinnati Bengals's points come from. Total = 97 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 39 | 42.16 | -3.16 | #25 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.60 | 5.97 | +0.63 | #4 |
| Yds / Drive | 36.10 | 30.97 | +5.13 | #7 |
| Points / Drive | 2.31 | 2.10 | +0.21 | #12 |
| Score % | 46.20 | 39.32 | +6.88 | #11 |
| Turnover % | 10.30 | 10.85 | -0.55 | #17 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 83 | 106.75 | -23.75 | #31 |
| Rush Yds | 297 | 445.56 | -148.56 | #31 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.60 | 4.13 | -0.53 | #26 |
| Rush TD | 2 | 3.72 | -1.72 | #22 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -4.31 | -1.75 | -2.56 | #21 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 157 | 131.75 | +25.25 | #5 |
| Pass Cmp | 112 | 84.69 | +27.31 | #2 |
| Cmp % | 71.30 | 64.33 | +6.97 | #3 |
| Pass Yds | 1110 | 884.31 | +225.69 | #5 |
| Yds / Att | 7.50 | 7.16 | +0.34 | #10 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.50 | 11.14 | -0.64 | #22 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.50 | 7.12 | +0.38 | #13 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.70 | 6.30 | +0.40 | #13 |
| Pass TD | 7 | 6.28 | +0.72 | #12 |
| TD % | 4.50 | 4.77 | -0.27 | #17 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 3.14 | -0.14 | #18 |
| Int % | 1.90 | 2.44 | -0.54 | #15 |
| Sack % | 5.40 | 6.50 | -1.10 | #13 |
| Pass Rating | 99.50 | 92.22 | +7.28 | #11 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 29.11 | 19.24 | +9.87 | #12 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 53 | 50.47 | +2.53 | #8 |
| 3rd Down Made | 24 | 19.81 | +4.19 | #5 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 5.19 | -1.19 | #22 |
| 4th Down Made | 3 | 2.81 | +0.19 | #13 |
| Red Zone Att | 12 | 13.13 | -1.13 | #17 |
| Red Zone Scores | 6 | 7.91 | -1.91 | #22 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 41 | 42.16 | -1.16 | #10 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.20 | 5.96 | +0.24 | #21 |
| Yds / Drive | 33.90 | 30.95 | +2.95 | #25 |
| Points / Drive | 1.93 | 2.10 | -0.17 | #13 |
| Score % | 41.50 | 39.21 | +2.29 | #20 |
| Turnover % | 12.20 | 10.73 | +1.47 | #12 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 88 | 106.75 | -18.75 | #3 |
| Rush Yds | 398 | 445.56 | -47.56 | #8 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.50 | 4.17 | +0.33 | #23 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 3.72 | -0.72 | #13 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 2.45 | 1.75 | +0.70 | #16 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 141 | 131.75 | +9.25 | #8 |
| Pass Cmp | 90 | 84.69 | +5.31 | #24 |
| Cmp % | 63.80 | 64.43 | -0.63 | #14 |
| Pass Yds | 992 | 884.31 | +107.69 | #26 |
| Yds / Att | 7.70 | 7.15 | +0.55 | #21 |
| Yds / Cmp | 12.10 | 11.14 | +0.96 | #27 |
| Adj Y/A | 8 | 7.13 | +0.87 | #23 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.60 | 6.30 | +0.30 | #22 |
| Pass TD | 4 | 6.28 | -2.28 | #7 |
| TD % | 2.80 | 4.82 | -2.02 | #5 |
| Pass Int | 1 | 2.94 | -1.94 | #26 |
| Int % | 0.70 | 2.28 | -1.58 | #27 |
| Sack % | 9 | 6.22 | +2.78 | #3 |
| Pass Rating | 93.90 | 92.44 | +1.46 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -8.82 | -19.24 | +10.42 | #9 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 50 | 50.47 | -0.47 | #14 |
| 3rd Down Made | 22 | 19.81 | +2.19 | #24 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 5.19 | -1.19 | #14 |
| 4th Down Made | 0 | 2.81 | -2.81 | #5 |
| Red Zone Att | 13 | 13.13 | -0.13 | #16 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 7.91 | -3.91 | #5 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CIN 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — CIN 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 50-59 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CIN 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — CIN 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for CIN 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — CIN 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for CIN 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — CIN 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for CIN 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — CIN 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 633 | 273 | -360 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 239 | 61 | -178 |
| Penalties | 88 | 36 | -52 |
5-Year Trajectory
CIN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 120.8 | -9.4 | +111.4 |
| 2023 | 41.5 | -92.2 | -50.6 |
| 2024 | 150.9 | -101.9 | +48.9 |
| 2025 | 43.3 | -165.9 | -122.6 |
| 2026 | 24.1 | -0.6 | +23.5 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CIN 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs TB | W | 33-27 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ HOU | W | 20-6 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ PIT | L | 27-30 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs JAX | L | 17-22 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ MIA | W | 31-24 | P | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CIN has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 3-2 | 2-2-1 | 50.0% | 3-2 | 60.0% | +3.8 | +1.1 | 14 | +17.0 |
| Home | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +0.5 | -2.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| Away | 3 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +6.0 | +3.5 | 14 | +17.0 |
| As favorite | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | — | 3-1 | — | +1.2 | -2.9 | 7 | +2.5 |
| As underdog | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +14.0 | +17.0 | 14 | +17.0 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | -3.0 | -6.5 | — | -6.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 3-1 | 2-1-1 | — | 2-2 | — | +5.5 | +3.0 | 14 | +17.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | +4.5 | +4.8 | 14 | +17.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +1.5 | -2.0 | 6 | +2.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | +7.0 | +0.0 | 7 | +0.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Oct | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 3-2 | 2-2-1 | 3-2 | 50% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 3-2 | 2-2-1 | 3-2 | 50% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Turf | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Same conference | 3 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 | 1-2 | 50% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | P | 0 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 2 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 2 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 1 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| After a loss | 2 | 1-1 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | — |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 2-0 | 1-0-1 | 1-1 | 100% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | 3-1 | 33% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 2-1 | 1-1-1 | 2-1 | 50% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-0-1 | 1-1 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore Ravens (BAL) | 4-1 | 0.280 #32 | 29.0 | 24.0 | 45.42 | -12.02 |
| Cincinnati Bengals (CIN) | 3-2 | 0.360 #27 | 24.3 | 21.3 | 24.10 | -0.59 |
| Cleveland Browns (CLE) | 3-2 | 0.500 #16 | 20.3 | 23.8 | -3.37 | -10.72 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers (PIT) | 3-2 | 0.520 #14 | 19.3 | 21.8 | -12.43 | -2.46 |
Insights
As of week 4, how the 2026 Cincinnati Bengals rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive stuffed rate forced (2nd of 32), offensive yards before contact per carry (3rd of 32), and defensive sack rate (4th of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg yac allowed (32nd of 32), defensive ryoe per attempt allowed (32nd of 32), and defensive yac over expected allowed (32nd of 32).