Seattle Seahawks
Showing the 2025 season — the most recent with complete stats. 2026 appears here as its weeks complete.
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 483 | 391.22 | +91.78 | #3 |
| Total Yards | 5973 | 5,552.97 | +420.03 | #8 |
| Yds / Play | 5.90 | 5.33 | +0.58 | #6 |
| 1st Downs | 340 | 328.63 | +11.38 | #12 |
| Turnovers | 28 | 19.66 | +8.34 | #31 |
| Fumbles Lost | 13 | 7.78 | +5.22 | #32 |
| EXP Pts | 80.50 | 58.31 | +22.19 | #13 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 292 | 391.22 | -99.22 | #1 |
| Total Yards | 4860 | 5,552.97 | -692.97 | #6 |
| Yds / Play | 4.60 | 5.33 | -0.73 | #2 |
| 1st Downs | 291 | 328.63 | -37.63 | #4 |
| Turnovers | 25 | 19.66 | +5.34 | #6 |
| Fumbles Lost | 7 | 7.78 | -0.78 | #23 |
| EXP Pts | 81.09 | -58.31 | +139.40 | #1 |
Scoring Composition
Where Seattle Seahawks's points come from. Total = 483 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 183 | 177.88 | +5.13 | #8 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.80 | 6.05 | -0.25 | #25 |
| Yds / Drive | 32.50 | 31.19 | +1.31 | #11 |
| Points / Drive | 2.32 | 2.11 | +0.21 | #11 |
| Score % | 45.90 | 39.55 | +6.35 | #6 |
| Turnover % | 14.20 | 10.49 | +3.71 | #31 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 507 | 456.28 | +50.72 | #4 |
| Rush Yds | 2096 | 1,988.06 | +107.94 | #11 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.10 | 4.34 | -0.24 | #25 |
| Rush TD | 19 | 15.94 | +3.06 | #10 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -3.12 | 11.49 | -14.61 | #26 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 481 | 544.97 | -63.97 | #29 |
| Pass Cmp | 325 | 350.53 | -25.53 | #24 |
| Cmp % | 67.60 | 64.35 | +3.25 | #5 |
| Pass Yds | 3877 | 3,564.91 | +312.09 | #8 |
| Yds / Att | 8.10 | 6.56 | +1.54 | #2 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.90 | 10.16 | +1.74 | #1 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.70 | 6.49 | +1.21 | #6 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.30 | 6.05 | +1.25 | #5 |
| Pass TD | 25 | 25.34 | -0.34 | #18 |
| TD % | 5.20 | 4.66 | +0.54 | #11 |
| Pass Int | 15 | 11.88 | +3.13 | #26 |
| Int % | 3.10 | 2.21 | +0.89 | #28 |
| Sack % | 5.30 | 6.91 | -1.61 | #9 |
| Pass Rating | 96.30 | 89.31 | +6.99 | #8 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 93.20 | 60.56 | +32.64 | #9 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 206 | 214.38 | -8.38 | #23 |
| 3rd Down Made | 82 | 84.69 | -2.69 | #21 |
| 4th Down Att | 12 | 27.69 | -15.69 | #32 |
| 4th Down Made | 7 | 15.28 | -8.28 | #32 |
| Red Zone Att | 59 | 54.41 | +4.59 | #14 |
| Red Zone Scores | 32 | 31.16 | +0.84 | #15 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 188 | 177.88 | +10.13 | #30 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.80 | 6.05 | -0.25 | #8 |
| Yds / Drive | 25.80 | 31.21 | -5.41 | #4 |
| Points / Drive | 1.48 | 2.12 | -0.64 | #1 |
| Score % | 28.70 | 39.58 | -10.88 | #2 |
| Turnover % | 12.80 | 10.46 | +2.34 | #6 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 418 | 456.28 | -38.28 | #7 |
| Rush Yds | 1563 | 1,988.06 | -425.06 | #3 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.70 | 4.35 | -0.65 | #1 |
| Rush TD | 9 | 15.94 | -6.94 | #2 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 41.06 | -11.49 | +52.55 | #1 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 600 | 544.97 | +55.03 | #5 |
| Pass Cmp | 375 | 350.53 | +24.47 | #23 |
| Cmp % | 62.50 | 64.33 | -1.83 | #9 |
| Pass Yds | 3297 | 3,564.91 | -267.91 | #10 |
| Yds / Att | 6 | 7.02 | -1.02 | #1 |
| Yds / Cmp | 9.70 | 10.92 | -1.22 | #1 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.30 | 6.98 | -1.68 | #1 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.50 | 6.06 | -1.56 | #1 |
| Pass TD | 20 | 25.34 | -5.34 | #7 |
| TD % | 3.30 | 4.66 | -1.36 | #4 |
| Pass Int | 18 | 12.26 | +5.74 | #5 |
| Int % | 3 | 2.24 | +0.76 | #7 |
| Sack % | 7.30 | 6.91 | +0.39 | #12 |
| Pass Rating | 77.90 | 91.44 | -13.54 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 24.88 | -60.56 | +85.44 | #4 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 234 | 214.38 | +19.63 | #30 |
| 3rd Down Made | 75 | 84.69 | -9.69 | #3 |
| 4th Down Att | 45 | 27.69 | +17.31 | #32 |
| 4th Down Made | 23 | 15.28 | +7.72 | #29 |
| Red Zone Att | 52 | 54.41 | -2.41 | #14 |
| Red Zone Scores | 26 | 31.16 | -5.16 | #7 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for SEA 2025. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — SEA 2025
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% |
| 30-39 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
| 40-49 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% |
| 50-59 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for SEA 2025.
Pressure & Tackles — SEA 2025
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for SEA 2025. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — SEA 2025
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for SEA 2025 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — SEA 2025
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for SEA 2025. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — SEA 2025
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2025 vs 2024.
| Kickoff Yds | 5524 | 6290 | 766 |
| All Purpose Yds | 7579 | 8206 | 627 |
| Rush Yds | 1627 | 2096 | 469 |
5-Year Trajectory
SEA Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2021 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2021 | 99.3 | -97.5 | +1.8 |
| 2022 | 57.2 | -85.6 | -28.4 |
| 2023 | 62.3 | -122.5 | -60.1 |
| 2024 | 26.6 | -11.4 | +15.2 |
| 2025 | 80.5 | 81.1 | +161.6 |
Last game — Week 18, 2025
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for SEA 2025.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. SEA has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 14-3 | 12-5 | 70.6% | 9-8 | 52.9% | +11.2 | +6.9 | 31 | +23.5 |
| Home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 50.0% | 5-3 | 62.5% | +10.4 | +4.6 | 31 | +23.5 |
| Away | 9 | 8-1 | 8-1 | 88.9% | 4-5 | 44.4% | +12.0 | +8.9 | 28 | +21.5 |
| As favorite | 14 | 13-1 | 10-4 | 71.4% | 8-6 | 57.1% | +13.1 | +7.2 | 31 | +23.5 |
| As underdog | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | +2.7 | +5.7 | 14 | +17.5 |
| Division games | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 2-4 | 33.3% | +5.0 | +3.8 | 22 | +15.0 |
| Non-division | 11 | 10-1 | 8-3 | 72.7% | 7-4 | 63.6% | +14.6 | +8.6 | 31 | +23.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 8 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 75.0% | 3-5 | 37.5% | +6.0 | +5.1 | 24 | +21.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +7.0 | +2.0 | 17 | +10.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 6 | 6-0 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 4-2 | 66.7% | +19.2 | +9.2 | 31 | +23.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +14.0 | +17.5 | 14 | +17.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2025. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| SF | San Francisco 49ers | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | +3.0 | +3.0 |
| ARI | Arizona Cardinals | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | +12.5 | +8.2 |
| LAR | Los Angeles Rams | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -0.5 | +0.2 |
| PIT | Pittsburgh Steelers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +14.0 | +17.5 |
| NO | New Orleans Saints | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +31.0 | +23.5 |
| TB | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -3.0 | -6.5 |
| JAX | Jacksonville Jaguars | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +8.0 | +6.5 |
| HOU | Houston Texans | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +8.0 | +5.0 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +24.0 | +21.5 |
| TEN | Tennessee Titans | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +6.0 | -6.5 |
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +26.0 | +13.5 |
| ATL | Atlanta Falcons | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +28.0 | +21.0 |
| IND | Indianapolis Colts | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +2.0 | -11.5 |
| CAR | Carolina Panthers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +17.0 | +10.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Oct | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Nov | 5 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 80% |
| Dec | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Jan | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Sat | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Sun | 13 | 10-3 | 9-4 | 7-6 | 69% |
| Mon | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 8 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 75% |
| Second half (W10+) | 9 | 8-1 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 67% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 7 | 7-0 | 6-1 | 3-4 | 86% |
| Turf | 10 | 7-3 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 60% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 67% |
| Same conference | 6 | 5-1 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 83% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cool (40-59°F) | 9 | 9-0 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 67% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| Indoor | 3 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 100% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 5 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 80% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 62% |
| Windy (≥15 mph) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Indoor | 3 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 100% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 7 |
| ATS | W | 2 |
| O/U | U | 2 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 7 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 5 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 13 | 11-2 | 10-3 | 7-6 | 77% |
| After a loss | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 10 | 8-2 | 7-3 | 5-5 | 70% |
| vs winning opp. | 9 | 7-2 | 6-3 | 3-6 | 67% |
| vs losing opp. | 7 | 7-0 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 86% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 14 | 12-2 | 9-5 | 8-6 | 64% |
| Dome | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 9 | 8-1 | 8-1 | 4-5 | 89% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 50% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 3 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 0-3 | 100% |
| Long (1500+) | 6 | 6-0 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 83% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 10 | 9-1 | 8-2 | 5-5 | 80% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC West
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals (ARI) | 3-14 | 0.571 #2 | 20.9 | 28.7 | 36.49 | -136.29 |
| Los Angeles Rams (LAR) | 12-5 | 0.526 #7 | 30.5 | 20.4 | 219.88 | 6.16 |
| Seattle Seahawks (SEA) | 14-3 | 0.498 #17 | 28.4 | 17.2 | 80.50 | 81.09 |
| San Francisco 49ers (SF) | 12-5 | 0.498 #18 | 25.7 | 21.8 | 131.06 | -115.46 |
Insights
A look at how the 2025 Seattle Seahawks ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per rush allowed (1st of 32), and defensive rush success rate allowed (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive stuffed rate forced (32nd of 32), offensive stuffed rate (28th of 32), and offensive yards before contact per carry (27th of 32).
Rivalries
- Arizona Cardinals and Seattle Seahawks have met 16 times in the regular season. Seattle Seahawks leads the series 13 to 3. The most lopsided meeting was a 22-point win for Seattle Seahawks in 2025.
- Los Angeles Rams and Seattle Seahawks have met 16 times in the regular season. Los Angeles Rams leads the series 10 to 6. The most lopsided meeting was a 17-point win for Los Angeles Rams in 2023.
- Seattle Seahawks and San Francisco 49ers have met 16 times in the regular season. The series is even at 8 apiece. The most lopsided meeting was a 27-point win for Seattle Seahawks in 2018.