Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 109 | 115.13 | -6.13 | #21 |
| Total Yards | 1415 | 1,639.66 | -224.66 | #27 |
| Yds / Play | 4.60 | 5.36 | -0.76 | #29 |
| 1st Downs | 77 | 97.13 | -20.13 | #30 |
| Turnovers | 4 | 6.28 | -2.28 | #8 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 2.88 | -0.88 | #8 |
| EXP Pts | -23.49 | 15.60 | -39.09 | #29 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 64 | 115.13 | -51.13 | #1 |
| Total Yards | 1299 | 1,639.66 | -340.66 | #3 |
| Yds / Play | 4.60 | 5.36 | -0.76 | #3 |
| 1st Downs | 64 | 97.13 | -33.13 | #1 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 6.28 | +3.72 | #3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.88 | +1.13 | #7 |
| EXP Pts | 50.73 | -15.60 | +66.33 | #1 |
Scoring Composition
Where Minnesota Vikings's points come from. Total = 109 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 55 | 52.75 | +2.25 | #12 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.70 | 5.92 | -0.22 | #20 |
| Yds / Drive | 24.20 | 30.67 | -6.47 | #31 |
| Points / Drive | 1.78 | 2.11 | -0.33 | #24 |
| Score % | 40 | 39.28 | +0.73 | #14 |
| Turnover % | 7.30 | 11.00 | -3.70 | #10 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 152 | 131.84 | +20.16 | #4 |
| Rush Yds | 580 | 553.91 | +26.09 | #13 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.80 | 4.17 | -0.37 | #19 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 4.78 | -1.78 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -14.41 | -2.80 | -11.61 | #24 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 140 | 163.47 | -23.47 | #27 |
| Pass Cmp | 92 | 105.16 | -13.16 | #26 |
| Cmp % | 65.70 | 64.28 | +1.42 | #13 |
| Pass Yds | 835 | 1,085.75 | -250.75 | #29 |
| Yds / Att | 6.70 | 7.12 | -0.42 | #20 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.20 | 11.07 | -0.87 | #25 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.80 | 7.11 | -0.31 | #18 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.50 | 6.24 | -0.74 | #21 |
| Pass TD | 5 | 7.69 | -2.69 | #26 |
| TD % | 3.60 | 4.71 | -1.11 | #24 |
| Pass Int | 2 | 3.76 | -1.76 | #4 |
| Int % | 1.40 | 2.34 | -0.94 | #6 |
| Sack % | 9.70 | 6.50 | +3.20 | #27 |
| Pass Rating | 90.70 | 92.21 | -1.51 | #16 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -5.23 | 22.83 | -28.06 | #26 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 79 | 63.09 | +15.91 | #1 |
| 3rd Down Made | 30 | 24.84 | +5.16 | #6 |
| 4th Down Att | 3 | 6.72 | -3.72 | #31 |
| 4th Down Made | 3 | 3.63 | -0.63 | #16 |
| Red Zone Att | 12 | 16 | -4 | #29 |
| Red Zone Scores | 6 | 9.78 | -3.78 | #27 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 54 | 52.75 | +1.25 | #18 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.40 | 5.93 | -0.53 | #4 |
| Yds / Drive | 24.10 | 30.48 | -6.38 | #3 |
| Points / Drive | 1.09 | 2.09 | -1.00 | #1 |
| Score % | 24.10 | 39.07 | -14.97 | #1 |
| Turnover % | 16.70 | 10.99 | +5.71 | #3 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 108 | 131.84 | -23.84 | #3 |
| Rush Yds | 433 | 553.91 | -120.91 | #6 |
| Rush Y/A | 4 | 4.19 | -0.19 | #16 |
| Rush TD | 2 | 4.78 | -2.78 | #4 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 15.62 | 2.80 | +12.82 | #5 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 156 | 163.47 | -7.47 | #21 |
| Pass Cmp | 83 | 105.16 | -22.16 | #2 |
| Cmp % | 53.20 | 64.35 | -11.15 | #1 |
| Pass Yds | 866 | 1,085.75 | -219.75 | #3 |
| Yds / Att | 6.30 | 7.11 | -0.81 | #7 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.80 | 11.05 | +0.75 | #27 |
| Adj Y/A | 4.90 | 7.09 | -2.19 | #2 |
| Adj NY/A | 3.80 | 6.24 | -2.44 | #2 |
| Pass TD | 3 | 7.69 | -4.69 | #1 |
| TD % | 1.90 | 4.72 | -2.82 | #1 |
| Pass Int | 6 | 3.52 | +2.48 | #4 |
| Int % | 3.80 | 2.19 | +1.61 | #3 |
| Sack % | 9.80 | 6.34 | +3.46 | #1 |
| Pass Rating | 62.90 | 92.15 | -29.25 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 30.76 | -22.83 | +53.59 | #1 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 63 | 63.09 | -0.09 | #16 |
| 3rd Down Made | 14 | 24.84 | -10.84 | #2 |
| 4th Down Att | 10 | 6.72 | +3.28 | #28 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #17 |
| Red Zone Att | 12 | 16 | -4 | #5 |
| Red Zone Scores | 3 | 9.78 | -6.78 | #1 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for MIN 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — MIN 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for MIN 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — MIN 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for MIN 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — MIN 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for MIN 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — MIN 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for MIN 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — MIN 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 886 | 250 | -636 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 374 | 103 | -271 |
| Penalties | 111 | 30 | -81 |
5-Year Trajectory
MIN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 75.8 | -80.0 | -4.2 |
| 2023 | 42.6 | -37.6 | +5.0 |
| 2024 | 92.0 | 38.7 | +130.7 |
| 2025 | -40.4 | 39.6 | -0.9 |
| 2026 | -23.5 | 50.7 | +27.2 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for MIN 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs GB | W | 39-22 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ CHI | W | 9-3 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ TB | W | 23-16 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs MIA | W | 15-10 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ NO | W | 23-13 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. MIN has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 80.0% | 1-4 | 20.0% | +9.0 | +6.8 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Home | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +11.0 | +5.2 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Away | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | — | 0-3 | — | +7.7 | +7.8 | 10 | +10.5 |
| As favorite | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | — | 1-3 | — | +9.8 | +5.9 | 17 | +15.5 |
| As underdog | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +6.0 | +10.5 | 6 | +10.5 |
| Division games | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | — | 1-1 | — | +11.5 | +13.0 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Non-division | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | — | 0-3 | — | +7.3 | +2.7 | 10 | +7.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | — | 1-2 | — | +11.3 | +9.5 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | +5.0 | -5.0 | 5 | -5.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +6.0 | +10.5 | 6 | +10.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 100% |
| Oct | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 80% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 80% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Turf | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| Same conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 5 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | U | 4 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 5 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 0 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 4 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 0-4 | 75% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 67% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| vs losing opp. | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 67% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Dome | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 0-3 | 100% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 0-4 | 75% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 3-2 | 0.580 #7 | 23.8 | 19.2 | 29.78 | -5.98 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 3-2 | 0.420 #23 | 32.8 | 29.6 | 76.84 | -80.48 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 3-2 | 0.520 #15 | 20.8 | 22.4 | 1.81 | -7.58 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 5-0 | 0.320 #30 | 21.8 | 12.8 | -23.49 | 50.73 |
Insights
As of week 5, how the 2026 Minnesota Vikings rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), and defensive epa per play allowed (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), and offensive yards after contact per carry (29th of 32).
Rivalries
- Green Bay Packers and Minnesota Vikings have met 16 times in the regular season. Minnesota Vikings leads the series 8 to 7, with 1 tie. The most lopsided meeting was a 27-point win for Green Bay Packers in 2021.