Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 125 | 153.94 | -28.94 | #29 |
| Total Yards | 1690 | 2,223.56 | -533.56 | #32 |
| Yds / Play | 4.70 | 5.35 | -0.65 | #27 |
| 1st Downs | 94 | 132.25 | -38.25 | #32 |
| Turnovers | 4 | 8.19 | -4.19 | #4 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 3.63 | -1.63 | #7 |
| EXP Pts | -23.95 | 22.12 | -46.07 | #30 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 74 | 153.94 | -79.94 | #1 |
| Total Yards | 1517 | 2,223.56 | -706.56 | #1 |
| Yds / Play | 4.50 | 5.34 | -0.84 | #2 |
| 1st Downs | 79 | 132.25 | -53.25 | #1 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 8.19 | +2.81 | #5 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 3.63 | +0.38 | #14 |
| EXP Pts | 56.20 | -22.12 | +78.32 | #1 |
Scoring Composition
Where Minnesota Vikings's points come from. Total = 125 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 64 | 71.16 | -7.16 | #24 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.80 | 6.00 | -0.20 | #22 |
| Yds / Drive | 25.10 | 30.97 | -5.87 | #29 |
| Points / Drive | 1.78 | 2.12 | -0.34 | #26 |
| Score % | 40.60 | 39.59 | +1.01 | #13 |
| Turnover % | 6.30 | 10.59 | -4.29 | #4 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 181 | 178.38 | +2.63 | #13 |
| Rush Yds | 716 | 746.31 | -30.31 | #17 |
| Rush Y/A | 4 | 4.17 | -0.17 | #21 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 6.38 | -3.38 | #31 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -14.20 | -2.85 | -11.35 | #25 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 164 | 223.28 | -59.28 | #31 |
| Pass Cmp | 106 | 143.16 | -37.16 | #31 |
| Cmp % | 64.60 | 64.09 | +0.51 | #16 |
| Pass Yds | 974 | 1,477.25 | -503.25 | #31 |
| Yds / Att | 6.60 | 7.07 | -0.47 | #22 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.30 | 11.03 | -0.73 | #25 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.80 | 7.06 | -0.26 | #22 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.50 | 6.21 | -0.71 | #22 |
| Pass TD | 6 | 10.22 | -4.22 | #27 |
| TD % | 3.70 | 4.57 | -0.87 | #23 |
| Pass Int | 2 | 4.71 | -2.71 | #4 |
| Int % | 1.20 | 2.12 | -0.92 | #5 |
| Sack % | 9.90 | 6.41 | +3.49 | #30 |
| Pass Rating | 90.70 | 91.61 | -0.91 | #18 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -5.36 | 30.50 | -35.86 | #28 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 90 | 86.19 | +3.81 | #12 |
| 3rd Down Made | 33 | 34.34 | -1.34 | #20 |
| 4th Down Att | 5 | 9.50 | -4.50 | #29 |
| 4th Down Made | 4 | 5.09 | -1.09 | #19 |
| Red Zone Att | 14 | 22.06 | -8.06 | #32 |
| Red Zone Scores | 7 | 13.09 | -6.09 | #32 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 63 | 71.16 | -8.16 | #7 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.60 | 6.01 | -0.41 | #7 |
| Yds / Drive | 24.10 | 30.98 | -6.88 | #2 |
| Points / Drive | 1.10 | 2.11 | -1.01 | #1 |
| Score % | 23.80 | 39.47 | -15.67 | #1 |
| Turnover % | 15.90 | 10.67 | +5.23 | #2 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 141 | 178.38 | -37.38 | #3 |
| Rush Yds | 587 | 746.31 | -159.31 | #3 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.20 | 4.16 | +0.04 | #20 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 6.38 | -3.38 | #3 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 11.30 | 2.85 | +8.45 | #7 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 178 | 223.28 | -45.28 | #30 |
| Pass Cmp | 96 | 143.16 | -47.16 | #1 |
| Cmp % | 53.90 | 64.15 | -10.25 | #1 |
| Pass Yds | 930 | 1,477.25 | -547.25 | #1 |
| Yds / Att | 6.10 | 7.07 | -0.97 | #4 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.30 | 11.02 | +0.28 | #21 |
| Adj Y/A | 4.70 | 7.06 | -2.36 | #2 |
| Adj NY/A | 3.40 | 6.21 | -2.81 | #1 |
| Pass TD | 3 | 10.22 | -7.22 | #1 |
| TD % | 1.70 | 4.61 | -2.91 | #1 |
| Pass Int | 7 | 4.56 | +2.44 | #6 |
| Int % | 3.90 | 2.07 | +1.83 | #1 |
| Sack % | 10.60 | 6.28 | +4.32 | #1 |
| Pass Rating | 61.70 | 91.71 | -30.01 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 41.21 | -30.50 | +71.71 | #1 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 78 | 86.19 | -8.19 | #5 |
| 3rd Down Made | 22 | 34.34 | -12.34 | #2 |
| 4th Down Att | 11 | 9.50 | +1.50 | #20 |
| 4th Down Made | 5 | 5.09 | -0.09 | #17 |
| Red Zone Att | 13 | 22.06 | -9.06 | #2 |
| Red Zone Scores | 3 | 13.09 | -10.09 | #1 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for MIN 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — MIN 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for MIN 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — MIN 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for MIN 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — MIN 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for MIN 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — MIN 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for MIN 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — MIN 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 886 | 274 | -612 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 374 | 114 | -260 |
| Penalties | 111 | 34 | -77 |
5-Year Trajectory
MIN Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 75.8 | -80.0 | -4.2 |
| 2023 | 42.6 | -37.6 | +5.0 |
| 2024 | 92.0 | 38.7 | +130.7 |
| 2025 | -40.4 | 39.6 | -0.9 |
| 2026 | -24.0 | 56.2 | +32.3 |
Last game — Week 8, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for MIN 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs GB | W | 39-22 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ CHI | W | 9-3 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | @ TB | W | 23-16 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs MIA | W | 15-10 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ NO | W | 23-13 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | vs IND | W | 16-10 | L | — | — | — |
| 8 | @ DET | L | 15-19 | L | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. MIN has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 1-6 | 14.3% | +6.7 | +4.6 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Home | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | — | 1-2 | — | +9.3 | +3.3 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Away | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 0-4 | — | +4.8 | +5.6 | 10 | +10.5 |
| As favorite | 5 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 60.0% | 1-4 | 20.0% | +9.0 | +4.6 | 17 | +15.5 |
| As underdog | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 0-2 | — | +1.0 | +4.8 | 6 | +10.5 |
| Division games | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | +6.3 | +8.3 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | — | 0-4 | — | +7.0 | +1.9 | 10 | +7.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 1-3 | — | +7.5 | +6.9 | 17 | +15.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | +6.0 | -0.5 | 6 | -0.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | +5.0 | -5.0 | 5 | -5.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +6.0 | +10.5 | 6 | +10.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +17.0 | +15.5 |
| CHI | Chicago Bears | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +6.0 | +10.5 |
| TB | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +7.0 | +5.5 |
| MIA | Miami Dolphins | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +5.0 | -5.0 |
| NO | New Orleans Saints | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +10.0 | +7.5 |
| IND | Indianapolis Colts | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +6.0 | -0.5 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -4.0 | -1.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 100% |
| Oct | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 33% |
| Nov | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 1-6 | 57% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 1-6 | 57% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Turf | 5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 40% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| Same conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 2 |
| O/U | U | 6 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 6 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 6 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 0-6 | 50% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 40% |
| vs winning opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| vs losing opp. | 4 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 0-4 | 50% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
| Dome | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
| Retractable (closed) | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Domestic road | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-4 | 75% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
| Short (<500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 67% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 60% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 5-2 | 0.487 #18 | 25.7 | 20.4 | 49.92 | -9.41 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 5-2 | 0.526 #13 | 30.7 | 27.5 | 84.86 | -86.63 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 5-3 | 0.511 #15 | 20.6 | 20.7 | 13.49 | -11.38 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 6-1 | 0.444 #25 | 20.8 | 12.3 | -23.95 | 56.20 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 Minnesota Vikings rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), defensive epa per pass play allowed (1st of 32), and defensive epa per play allowed (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (32nd of 32), and offensive avg yards after catch (31st of 32).
Rivalries
- Green Bay Packers and Minnesota Vikings have met 16 times in the regular season. Minnesota Vikings leads the series 8 to 7, with 1 tie. The most lopsided meeting was a 27-point win for Green Bay Packers in 2021.