Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 70 | 115.13 | -45.13 | #31 |
| Total Yards | 1401 | 1,639.66 | -238.66 | #28 |
| Yds / Play | 5.10 | 5.36 | -0.26 | #19 |
| 1st Downs | 76 | 97.13 | -21.13 | #31 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 6.28 | +1.72 | #22 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.88 | +1.13 | #26 |
| EXP Pts | -13.52 | 15.60 | -29.12 | #26 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 132 | 115.13 | +16.88 | #25 |
| Total Yards | 1649 | 1,639.66 | +9.34 | #18 |
| Yds / Play | 5.50 | 5.36 | +0.14 | #20 |
| 1st Downs | 104 | 97.13 | +6.88 | #25 |
| Turnovers | 4 | 6.28 | -2.28 | #28 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2.88 | -1.88 | #30 |
| EXP Pts | -45.19 | -15.60 | -29.59 | #28 |
Scoring Composition
Where Miami Dolphins's points come from. Total = 70 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 47 | 52.75 | -5.75 | #26 |
| Plays / Drive | 6 | 5.92 | +0.08 | #14 |
| Yds / Drive | 29.50 | 30.67 | -1.17 | #16 |
| Points / Drive | 1.49 | 2.11 | -0.62 | #30 |
| Score % | 29.80 | 39.28 | -9.48 | #30 |
| Turnover % | 17 | 11.00 | +6.00 | #27 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 130 | 131.84 | -1.84 | #18 |
| Rush Yds | 633 | 553.91 | +79.09 | #11 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.90 | 4.17 | +0.73 | #5 |
| Rush TD | 5 | 4.78 | +0.22 | #12 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 7.21 | -2.80 | +10.01 | #7 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 130 | 163.47 | -33.47 | #31 |
| Pass Cmp | 73 | 105.16 | -32.16 | #32 |
| Cmp % | 56.20 | 64.28 | -8.08 | #32 |
| Pass Yds | 768 | 1,085.75 | -317.75 | #32 |
| Yds / Att | 6.50 | 7.12 | -0.62 | #23 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.60 | 11.07 | +0.53 | #13 |
| Adj Y/A | 5.50 | 7.11 | -1.61 | #27 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.40 | 6.24 | -1.84 | #30 |
| Pass TD | 2 | 7.69 | -5.69 | #32 |
| TD % | 1.50 | 4.71 | -3.21 | #32 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 3.76 | +0.24 | #17 |
| Int % | 3.10 | 2.34 | +0.76 | #24 |
| Sack % | 9.70 | 6.50 | +3.20 | #28 |
| Pass Rating | 68.40 | 92.21 | -23.81 | #32 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -18.28 | 22.83 | -41.11 | #30 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 63 | 63.09 | -0.09 | #18 |
| 3rd Down Made | 26 | 24.84 | +1.16 | #13 |
| 4th Down Att | 7 | 6.72 | +0.28 | #16 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 3.63 | -1.63 | #25 |
| Red Zone Att | 13 | 16 | -3 | #26 |
| Red Zone Scores | 6 | 9.78 | -3.78 | #26 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 48 | 52.75 | -4.75 | #4 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.50 | 5.93 | +0.57 | #30 |
| Yds / Drive | 34.40 | 30.48 | +3.92 | #29 |
| Points / Drive | 2.75 | 2.09 | +0.66 | #29 |
| Score % | 50 | 39.07 | +10.93 | #32 |
| Turnover % | 8.30 | 10.99 | -2.69 | #25 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 151 | 131.84 | +19.16 | #26 |
| Rush Yds | 553 | 553.91 | -0.91 | #16 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.70 | 4.19 | -0.49 | #8 |
| Rush TD | 4 | 4.78 | -0.78 | #12 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 14.76 | 2.80 | +11.96 | #6 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 145 | 163.47 | -18.47 | #27 |
| Pass Cmp | 111 | 105.16 | +5.84 | #24 |
| Cmp % | 76.60 | 64.35 | +12.25 | #32 |
| Pass Yds | 1096 | 1,085.75 | +10.25 | #17 |
| Yds / Att | 7.80 | 7.11 | +0.69 | #26 |
| Yds / Cmp | 10.20 | 11.05 | -0.85 | #7 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.40 | 7.09 | +1.31 | #28 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.90 | 6.24 | +1.66 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 11 | 7.69 | +3.31 | #27 |
| TD % | 7.60 | 4.72 | +2.88 | #31 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 3.52 | -0.52 | #20 |
| Int % | 2.10 | 2.19 | -0.09 | #17 |
| Sack % | 2.70 | 6.34 | -3.64 | #31 |
| Pass Rating | 115 | 92.15 | +22.85 | #30 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -62.56 | -22.83 | -39.73 | #28 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 58 | 63.09 | -5.09 | #7 |
| 3rd Down Made | 30 | 24.84 | +5.16 | #28 |
| 4th Down Att | 3 | 6.72 | -3.72 | #3 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 3.63 | -1.63 | #6 |
| Red Zone Att | 22 | 16 | +6 | #32 |
| Red Zone Scores | 14 | 9.78 | +4.22 | #27 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for MIA 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — MIA 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| 50-59 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for MIA 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — MIA 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for MIA 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — MIA 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for MIA 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — MIA 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for MIA 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — MIA 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 811 | 260 | -551 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 254 | 81 | -173 |
| Penalties | 101 | 39 | -62 |
5-Year Trajectory
MIA Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 94.6 | -68.8 | +25.8 |
| 2023 | 139.5 | -1.0 | +138.4 |
| 2024 | 0.1 | -5.7 | -5.6 |
| 2025 | 17.5 | -121.8 | -104.3 |
| 2026 | -13.5 | -45.2 | -58.7 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for MIA 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ LV | L | 13-27 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ SF | L | 13-35 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs KC | L | 10-24 | L | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ MIN | L | 10-15 | W | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs CIN | L | 24-31 | P | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. MIA has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 0-5 | 1-3-1 | 25.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | -12.4 | -3.9 | — | +5.0 |
| Home | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -10.5 | -2.0 | — | +0.0 |
| Away | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | — | 1-2 | — | -13.7 | -5.2 | — | +5.0 |
| As underdog | 5 | 0-5 | 1-3-1 | 25.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | -12.4 | -3.9 | — | +5.0 |
| Non-division | 5 | 0-5 | 1-3-1 | 25.0% | 2-3 | 40.0% | -12.4 | -3.9 | — | +5.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 0-1 | — | -14.0 | -11.0 | — | -11.0 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 4 | 0-4 | 1-2-1 | — | 2-2 | — | -12.0 | -2.1 | — | +5.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0% |
| Oct | 2 | 0-2 | 1-0-1 | 1-1 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 0-5 | 1-3-1 | 2-3 | 25% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 0-5 | 1-3-1 | 2-3 | 25% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 0-4 | 0-3-1 | 2-2 | 0% |
| Turf | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same conference | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 1-2 | 0% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 5 |
| ATS | P | 0 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 0 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 5 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 3 |
| Longest O streak | 1 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a loss | 4 | 0-4 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 3 | 0-3 | 1-1-1 | 1-2 | 50% |
| vs winning opp. | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2-1 | 2-1 | 0% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1-1 | 1-1 | 0% |
| Long (1500+) | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 0-4 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Bills (BUF) | 4-1 | 0.360 #28 | 32.8 | 28.2 | 78.88 | -63.01 |
| Miami Dolphins (MIA) | 0-5 | 0.840 #1 | 14.0 | 26.4 | -13.52 | -45.19 |
| New England Patriots (NE) | 3-2 | 0.680 #3 | 22.0 | 18.8 | 21.01 | -0.26 |
| New York Jets (NYJ) | 2-3 | 0.480 #19 | 18.6 | 19.2 | -4.74 | -2.10 |
Insights
As of week 5, how the 2026 Miami Dolphins rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32), offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32), and defensive yac over expected allowed (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: offensive avg wr separation (32nd of 32), defensive sack rate (32nd of 32), and offensive epa per pass play (31st of 32). Notably, defensive yac over expected allowed (2nd) yet offensive avg wr separation (32nd).