Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 102 | 92.44 | +9.56 | #13 |
| Total Yards | 1137 | 1,329.88 | -192.88 | #25 |
| Yds / Play | 4.50 | 5.38 | -0.88 | #31 |
| 1st Downs | 77 | 79.13 | -2.13 | #18 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 4.91 | +3.09 | #28 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.06 | +1.94 | #30 |
| EXP Pts | -1.98 | 14.06 | -16.04 | #21 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 104 | 92.44 | +11.56 | #22 |
| Total Yards | 1569 | 1,329.88 | +239.13 | #31 |
| Yds / Play | 6.20 | 5.39 | +0.81 | #31 |
| 1st Downs | 81 | 79.13 | +1.88 | #19 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 4.91 | -2.91 | #30 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2.06 | -1.06 | #24 |
| EXP Pts | -20.90 | -14.06 | -6.84 | #21 |
Scoring Composition
Where Indianapolis Colts's points come from. Total = 102 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 45 | 42.16 | +2.84 | #11 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.90 | 5.97 | -0.07 | #15 |
| Yds / Drive | 25.30 | 30.97 | -5.67 | #30 |
| Points / Drive | 2.29 | 2.10 | +0.19 | #13 |
| Score % | 46.70 | 39.32 | +7.38 | #10 |
| Turnover % | 17.80 | 10.85 | +6.95 | #27 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 113 | 106.75 | +6.25 | #11 |
| Rush Yds | 438 | 445.56 | -7.56 | #14 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.90 | 4.13 | -0.23 | #19 |
| Rush TD | 7 | 3.72 | +3.28 | #5 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 12.67 | -1.75 | +14.42 | #4 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 132 | 131.75 | +0.25 | #15 |
| Pass Cmp | 84 | 84.69 | -0.69 | #14 |
| Cmp % | 63.60 | 64.33 | -0.73 | #17 |
| Pass Yds | 699 | 884.31 | -185.31 | #26 |
| Yds / Att | 5.70 | 7.16 | -1.46 | #30 |
| Yds / Cmp | 9 | 11.14 | -2.14 | #31 |
| Adj Y/A | 4.80 | 7.12 | -2.32 | #31 |
| Adj NY/A | 4.10 | 6.30 | -2.20 | #31 |
| Pass TD | 3 | 6.28 | -3.28 | #29 |
| TD % | 2.30 | 4.77 | -2.47 | #31 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 3.14 | +0.86 | #23 |
| Int % | 3 | 2.44 | +0.56 | #23 |
| Sack % | 5.70 | 6.50 | -0.80 | #14 |
| Pass Rating | 73.90 | 92.22 | -18.32 | #27 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -12.34 | 19.24 | -31.58 | #31 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 53 | 50.47 | +2.53 | #10 |
| 3rd Down Made | 20 | 19.81 | +0.19 | #15 |
| 4th Down Att | 6 | 5.19 | +0.81 | #11 |
| 4th Down Made | 5 | 2.81 | +2.19 | #4 |
| Red Zone Att | 12 | 13.13 | -1.13 | #18 |
| Red Zone Scores | 9 | 7.91 | +1.09 | #9 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 46 | 42.16 | +3.84 | #29 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.70 | 5.96 | -0.26 | #11 |
| Yds / Drive | 34.10 | 30.95 | +3.15 | #26 |
| Points / Drive | 2.26 | 2.10 | +0.16 | #23 |
| Score % | 43.50 | 39.21 | +4.29 | #24 |
| Turnover % | 4.30 | 10.73 | -6.43 | #32 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 109 | 106.75 | +2.25 | #19 |
| Rush Yds | 524 | 445.56 | +78.44 | #26 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.80 | 4.17 | +0.63 | #26 |
| Rush TD | 5 | 3.72 | +1.28 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -8.33 | 1.75 | -10.08 | #29 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 136 | 131.75 | +4.25 | #14 |
| Pass Cmp | 83 | 84.69 | -1.69 | #14 |
| Cmp % | 61 | 64.43 | -3.43 | #8 |
| Pass Yds | 1045 | 884.31 | +160.69 | #29 |
| Yds / Att | 8.10 | 7.15 | +0.95 | #28 |
| Yds / Cmp | 13.30 | 11.14 | +2.16 | #30 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.70 | 7.13 | +1.57 | #29 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.70 | 6.30 | +1.40 | #29 |
| Pass TD | 6 | 6.28 | -0.28 | #17 |
| TD % | 4.40 | 4.82 | -0.42 | #17 |
| Pass Int | 1 | 2.94 | -1.94 | #28 |
| Int % | 0.70 | 2.28 | -1.58 | #29 |
| Sack % | 6.20 | 6.22 | -0.02 | #17 |
| Pass Rating | 98.40 | 92.44 | +5.96 | #23 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -17.13 | -19.24 | +2.11 | #16 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 48 | 50.47 | -2.47 | #11 |
| 3rd Down Made | 14 | 19.81 | -5.81 | #4 |
| 4th Down Att | 8 | 5.19 | +2.81 | #29 |
| 4th Down Made | 3 | 2.81 | +0.19 | #19 |
| Red Zone Att | 14 | 13.13 | +0.88 | #19 |
| Red Zone Scores | 8 | 7.91 | +0.09 | #16 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for IND 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — IND 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for IND 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — IND 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for IND 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — IND 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for IND 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — IND 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for IND 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — IND 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 870 | 105 | -765 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 212 | 55 | -157 |
| Penalties | 104 | 16 | -88 |
5-Year Trajectory
IND Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | -110.5 | -51.1 | -161.5 |
| 2023 | 30.1 | -38.2 | -8.1 |
| 2024 | 12.5 | -73.3 | -60.8 |
| 2025 | 135.4 | -95.2 | +40.3 |
| 2026 | -2.0 | -20.9 | -22.9 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for IND 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs BAL | L | 23-41 | L | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ KC | L | 30-33 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs HOU | W | 19-17 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ WAS | W | 30-13 | W | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ PIT | L | 22-34 | L | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. IND has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 60.0% | 3-2 | 60.0% | -2.8 | -1.0 | 17 | +12.5 |
| Home | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -8.0 | -5.8 | 2 | +3.5 |
| Away | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +0.7 | +2.2 | 17 | +12.5 |
| As favorite | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +17.0 | +12.5 | 17 | +12.5 |
| As underdog | 4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | — | 3-1 | — | -7.8 | -4.4 | 2 | +3.5 |
| Division games | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +2.0 | +3.5 | 2 | +3.5 |
| Non-division | 4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | — | 3-1 | — | -4.0 | -2.1 | 17 | +12.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | — | 2-1 | — | -9.3 | -6.8 | 2 | +3.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +17.0 | +12.5 | 17 | +12.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | -3.0 | +3.0 | — | +3.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Oct | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Turf | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Same conference | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 1 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 2 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| After a loss | 2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 100% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Short (<500) | 2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 4 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC South
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Texans (HOU) | 1-4 | 0.430 #22 | 21.0 | 27.3 | 9.62 | -25.39 |
| Indianapolis Colts (IND) | 2-3 | 0.580 #8 | 25.5 | 26.0 | -1.98 | -20.90 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars (JAX) | 4-1 | 0.560 #10 | 26.0 | 13.3 | 40.11 | 1.82 |
| Tennessee Titans (TEN) | 0-5 | 0.500 #17 | 13.8 | 20.8 | -4.38 | -12.15 |
Insights
As of week 4, how the 2026 Indianapolis Colts rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per rush (3rd of 32), offensive epa per rush (3rd of 32), and defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (3rd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (32nd of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (32nd of 32), and defensive yards before contact per carry allowed (32nd of 32).