Chicago Bears
Showing the 2025 season — the most recent with complete stats. 2026 appears here as its weeks complete.
Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 441 | 391.22 | +49.78 | #9 |
| Total Yards | 6282 | 5,552.97 | +729.03 | #6 |
| Yds / Play | 5.70 | 5.33 | +0.38 | #9 |
| 1st Downs | 358 | 328.63 | +29.38 | #6 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 19.66 | -8.66 | #1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 7.78 | -3.78 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | 117.89 | 58.31 | +59.58 | #9 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 415 | 391.22 | +23.78 | #23 |
| Total Yards | 6150 | 5,552.97 | +597.03 | #29 |
| Yds / Play | 6 | 5.33 | +0.67 | #30 |
| 1st Downs | 347 | 328.63 | +18.38 | #24 |
| Turnovers | 33 | 19.66 | +13.34 | #1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 10 | 7.78 | +2.22 | #4 |
| EXP Pts | -98.10 | -58.31 | -39.79 | #23 |
Scoring Composition
Where Chicago Bears's points come from. Total = 441 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 183 | 177.88 | +5.13 | #7 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.20 | 6.05 | +0.15 | #11 |
| Yds / Drive | 34 | 31.19 | +2.81 | #7 |
| Points / Drive | 2.34 | 2.11 | +0.23 | #10 |
| Score % | 43.70 | 39.55 | +4.15 | #9 |
| Turnover % | 6 | 10.49 | -4.49 | #2 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 505 | 456.28 | +48.72 | #5 |
| Rush Yds | 2456 | 1,988.06 | +467.94 | #3 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.90 | 4.34 | +0.56 | #3 |
| Rush TD | 19 | 15.94 | +3.06 | #9 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 50.03 | 11.49 | +38.54 | #4 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 574 | 544.97 | +29.03 | #10 |
| Pass Cmp | 334 | 350.53 | -16.53 | #20 |
| Cmp % | 58.20 | 64.35 | -6.15 | #31 |
| Pass Yds | 3826 | 3,564.91 | +261.09 | #10 |
| Yds / Att | 6.70 | 6.56 | +0.14 | #11 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.50 | 10.16 | +1.34 | #4 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.10 | 6.49 | +0.61 | #8 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.80 | 6.05 | +0.75 | #8 |
| Pass TD | 28 | 25.34 | +2.66 | #10 |
| TD % | 4.90 | 4.66 | +0.24 | #13 |
| Pass Int | 7 | 11.88 | -4.88 | #3 |
| Int % | 1.20 | 2.21 | -1.01 | #1 |
| Sack % | 4 | 6.91 | -2.91 | #3 |
| Pass Rating | 89.50 | 89.31 | +0.19 | #14 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 88.70 | 60.56 | +28.14 | #10 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 227 | 214.38 | +12.63 | #8 |
| 3rd Down Made | 97 | 84.69 | +12.31 | #4 |
| 4th Down Att | 29 | 27.69 | +1.31 | #12 |
| 4th Down Made | 15 | 15.28 | -0.28 | #15 |
| Red Zone Att | 55 | 54.41 | +0.59 | #17 |
| Red Zone Scores | 32 | 31.16 | +0.84 | #14 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 180 | 177.88 | +2.13 | #22 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.80 | 6.05 | -0.25 | #12 |
| Yds / Drive | 33.80 | 31.21 | +2.59 | #23 |
| Points / Drive | 2.19 | 2.12 | +0.08 | #17 |
| Score % | 38.90 | 39.58 | -0.68 | #14 |
| Turnover % | 18.30 | 10.46 | +7.84 | #1 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 457 | 456.28 | +0.72 | #18 |
| Rush Yds | 2287 | 1,988.06 | +298.94 | #27 |
| Rush Y/A | 5 | 4.35 | +0.65 | #29 |
| Rush TD | 15 | 15.94 | -0.94 | #15 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -24.21 | -11.49 | -12.72 | #26 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 533 | 544.97 | -11.97 | #19 |
| Pass Cmp | 355 | 350.53 | +4.47 | #18 |
| Cmp % | 66.60 | 64.33 | +2.27 | #25 |
| Pass Yds | 3863 | 3,564.91 | +298.09 | #22 |
| Yds / Att | 7.60 | 7.02 | +0.58 | #28 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.50 | 10.92 | +0.58 | #27 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.90 | 6.98 | -0.08 | #18 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.06 | +0.04 | #18 |
| Pass TD | 32 | 25.34 | +6.66 | #28 |
| TD % | 6 | 4.66 | +1.34 | #28 |
| Pass Int | 23 | 12.26 | +10.74 | #1 |
| Int % | 4.30 | 2.24 | +2.06 | #1 |
| Sack % | 6.20 | 6.91 | -0.71 | #20 |
| Pass Rating | 91.40 | 91.44 | -0.04 | #16 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -84.78 | -60.56 | -24.22 | #19 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 191 | 214.38 | -23.38 | #1 |
| 3rd Down Made | 78 | 84.69 | -6.69 | #8 |
| 4th Down Att | 23 | 27.69 | -4.69 | #12 |
| 4th Down Made | 11 | 15.28 | -4.28 | #8 |
| Red Zone Att | 57 | 54.41 | +2.59 | #21 |
| Red Zone Scores | 32 | 31.16 | +0.84 | #20 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for CHI 2025. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — CHI 2025
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% |
| 40-49 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% |
| 50-59 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Blocked FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for CHI 2025.
Pressure & Tackles — CHI 2025
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for CHI 2025. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — CHI 2025
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for CHI 2025 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — CHI 2025
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for CHI 2025. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — CHI 2025
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2025 vs 2024.
| All Purpose Yds | 6479 | 8744 | 2265 |
| Total Yards | 4820 | 6282 | 1462 |
| Kickoff Yds | 4479 | 5736 | 1257 |
5-Year Trajectory
CHI Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2021 through 2025. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2021 | -40.9 | -77.5 | -118.4 |
| 2022 | -7.1 | -169.1 | -176.3 |
| 2023 | -10.7 | -34.6 | -45.3 |
| 2024 | -43.5 | -53.7 | -97.1 |
| 2025 | 117.9 | -98.1 | +19.8 |
Last game — Week 18, 2025
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for CHI 2025.
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. CHI has 17 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 17 | 11-6 | 9-7-1 | 56.3% | 8-9 | 47.1% | +1.5 | +2.2 | 28 | +20.5 |
| Home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-3-1 | 57.1% | 2-6 | 25.0% | +8.0 | +5.3 | 28 | +20.5 |
| Away | 9 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 55.6% | 6-3 | 66.7% | -4.2 | -0.6 | 9 | +16.0 |
| As favorite | 7 | 6-1 | 4-2-1 | 66.7% | 2-5 | 28.6% | +7.9 | +3.9 | 28 | +20.5 |
| As underdog | 10 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 50.0% | 6-4 | 60.0% | -2.9 | +0.9 | 17 | +18.5 |
| Division games | 6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 33.3% | 3-3 | 50.0% | -6.0 | -4.0 | 6 | +5.0 |
| Non-division | 11 | 9-2 | 7-3-1 | 70.0% | 5-6 | 45.5% | +5.6 | +5.5 | 28 | +20.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 8 | 6-2 | 5-2-1 | 71.4% | 5-3 | 62.5% | +2.1 | +2.4 | 17 | +18.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | — | 0-3 | — | +4.3 | +0.2 | 12 | +7.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +28.0 | +20.5 | 28 | +20.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | — | 3-1 | — | -10.2 | -4.9 | 1 | +6.5 |
| Large underdog (7+) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +9.0 | +16.0 | 9 | +16.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2025. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| MIN | Minnesota Vikings | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -0.5 | +1.8 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | -17.0 | -15.8 |
| GB | Green Bay Packers | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | -0.5 | +2.0 |
| DAL | Dallas Cowboys | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +17.0 | +18.5 |
| LV | Las Vegas Raiders | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +1.0 | +2.5 |
| WAS | Washington Commanders | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +1.0 | +6.5 |
| NO | New Orleans Saints | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +12.0 | +7.5 |
| BAL | Baltimore Ravens | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -14.0 | -11.5 |
| CIN | Cincinnati Bengals | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +5.0 | +2.0 |
| NYG | New York Giants | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | +4.0 | -0.5 |
| PIT | Pittsburgh Steelers | 1 | 1-0 | 0-0-1 | 1-0 | +3.0 | +0.0 |
| PHI | Philadelphia Eagles | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +9.0 | +16.0 |
| CLE | Cleveland Browns | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +28.0 | +20.5 |
| SF | San Francisco 49ers | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -4.0 | -0.5 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 50% |
| Oct | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| Nov | 5 | 5-0 | 3-1-1 | 2-3 | 75% |
| Dec | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 50% |
| Jan | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Sun | 13 | 8-5 | 6-6-1 | 7-6 | 50% |
| Mon | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 8 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 62% |
| Second half (W10+) | 9 | 6-3 | 4-4-1 | 3-6 | 50% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 14 | 9-5 | 7-6-1 | 6-8 | 54% |
| Turf | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 33% |
| Same conference | 6 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 1-5 | 67% |
| Inter-conference | 5 | 4-1 | 3-1-1 | 4-1 | 75% |
Weather
How the team performs in cold, hot, windy, and indoor conditions.
By temperature
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold (<40°F) | 5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 40% |
| Cool (40-59°F) | 6 | 5-1 | 4-1-1 | 3-3 | 80% |
| Mild (60-74°F) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Warm (75°F+) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Indoor | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By wind
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm (<5 mph) | 4 | 2-2 | 1-2-1 | 2-2 | 33% |
| Breezy (5-14 mph) | 9 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 56% |
| Windy (≥15 mph) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| Indoor | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 2 |
| ATS | L | 2 |
| O/U | U | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 5 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 2 |
| Longest ATS cover | 4 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 2 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 11 | 8-3 | 6-4-1 | 5-6 | 60% |
| After a loss | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 60% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 8 | 5-3 | 4-3-1 | 4-4 | 57% |
| On 2+ losing streak | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 6 | 4-2 | 3-2-1 | 3-3 | 60% |
| vs losing opp. | 8 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 62% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 14 | 9-5 | 7-6-1 | 6-8 | 54% |
| Dome | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 8 | 6-2 | 4-3-1 | 2-6 | 57% |
| Domestic road | 9 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 56% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 8 | 6-2 | 4-3-1 | 2-6 | 57% |
| Short (<500) | 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 50% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| Long (1500+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (5-7d) | 13 | 10-3 | 8-4-1 | 5-8 | 67% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: NFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears (CHI) | 11-6 | 0.458 #29 | 25.9 | 24.4 | 117.89 | -98.10 |
| Detroit Lions (DET) | 9-8 | 0.490 #21 | 28.3 | 24.3 | 173.52 | -78.18 |
| Green Bay Packers (GB) | 9-7-1 | 0.483 #24 | 23.0 | 21.2 | 151.08 | -80.60 |
| Minnesota Vikings (MIN) | 9-8 | 0.514 #12 | 20.2 | 19.6 | -40.41 | 39.55 |
Insights
A look at how the 2025 Chicago Bears ranked among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32), offensive avg time to throw (1st of 32), and offensive avg wr separation (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg time to pressure (32nd of 32), defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (32nd of 32), and defensive yards allowed per play (30th of 32).
Rivalries
- Chicago Bears and Detroit Lions have met 16 times in the regular season. The series is even at 8 apiece. The most lopsided meeting was a 31-point win for Detroit Lions in 2022.
- Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers have met 16 times in the regular season. Green Bay Packers leads the series 13 to 3. The most lopsided meeting was a 19-point win for Green Bay Packers in 2020.
- Chicago Bears and Minnesota Vikings have met 16 times in the regular season. Minnesota Vikings leads the series 9 to 7. The most lopsided meeting was a 18-point win for Minnesota Vikings in 2024.