Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 77 | 92.44 | -15.44 | #23 |
| Total Yards | 1271 | 1,329.88 | -58.88 | #17 |
| Yds / Play | 5 | 5.38 | -0.38 | #23 |
| 1st Downs | 77 | 79.13 | -2.13 | #20 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 4.91 | +1.09 | #22 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 2.06 | -0.06 | #13 |
| EXP Pts | -12.43 | 14.06 | -26.49 | #27 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 87 | 92.44 | -5.44 | #14 |
| Total Yards | 1289 | 1,329.88 | -40.88 | #13 |
| Yds / Play | 5.70 | 5.39 | +0.31 | #22 |
| 1st Downs | 72 | 79.13 | -7.13 | #8 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 4.91 | +3.09 | #4 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.06 | +1.94 | #5 |
| EXP Pts | -2.46 | -14.06 | +11.60 | #12 |
Scoring Composition
Where Pittsburgh Steelers's points come from. Total = 77 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 47 | 42.16 | +4.84 | #2 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.60 | 5.97 | -0.37 | #24 |
| Yds / Drive | 26.40 | 30.97 | -4.57 | #26 |
| Points / Drive | 1.49 | 2.10 | -0.61 | #27 |
| Score % | 29.80 | 39.32 | -9.52 | #27 |
| Turnover % | 12.80 | 10.85 | +1.95 | #22 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 86 | 106.75 | -20.75 | #30 |
| Rush Yds | 379 | 445.56 | -66.56 | #22 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.40 | 4.13 | +0.27 | #9 |
| Rush TD | 0 | 3.72 | -3.72 | #32 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.14 | -1.75 | +0.61 | #16 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 155 | 131.75 | +23.25 | #6 |
| Pass Cmp | 88 | 84.69 | +3.31 | #11 |
| Cmp % | 56.80 | 64.33 | -7.53 | #30 |
| Pass Yds | 892 | 884.31 | +7.69 | #16 |
| Yds / Att | 6.40 | 7.16 | -0.76 | #25 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.40 | 11.14 | +0.26 | #15 |
| Adj Y/A | 6.20 | 7.12 | -0.92 | #23 |
| Adj NY/A | 5.10 | 6.30 | -1.20 | #24 |
| Pass TD | 7 | 6.28 | +0.72 | #14 |
| TD % | 4.50 | 4.77 | -0.27 | #18 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 3.14 | +0.86 | #20 |
| Int % | 2.60 | 2.44 | +0.16 | #19 |
| Sack % | 7.70 | 6.50 | +1.20 | #23 |
| Pass Rating | 80.60 | 92.22 | -11.62 | #24 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -7.98 | 19.24 | -27.22 | #25 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 50 | 50.47 | -0.47 | #21 |
| 3rd Down Made | 16 | 19.81 | -3.81 | #28 |
| 4th Down Att | 3 | 5.19 | -2.19 | #27 |
| 4th Down Made | 1 | 2.81 | -1.81 | #30 |
| Red Zone Att | 9 | 13.13 | -4.13 | #31 |
| Red Zone Scores | 4 | 7.91 | -3.91 | #31 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 45 | 42.16 | +2.84 | #24 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.30 | 5.96 | -0.66 | #3 |
| Yds / Drive | 28.70 | 30.95 | -2.25 | #11 |
| Points / Drive | 1.78 | 2.10 | -0.32 | #8 |
| Score % | 35.60 | 39.21 | -3.61 | #11 |
| Turnover % | 15.60 | 10.73 | +4.87 | #4 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 104 | 106.75 | -2.75 | #14 |
| Rush Yds | 451 | 445.56 | +5.44 | #17 |
| Rush Y/A | 4.30 | 4.17 | +0.13 | #19 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 3.72 | -0.72 | #11 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -2.17 | 1.75 | -3.92 | #21 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 114 | 131.75 | -17.75 | #28 |
| Pass Cmp | 78 | 84.69 | -6.69 | #8 |
| Cmp % | 68.40 | 64.43 | +3.97 | #26 |
| Pass Yds | 838 | 884.31 | -46.31 | #12 |
| Yds / Att | 7.90 | 7.15 | +0.75 | #24 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.60 | 11.14 | +0.46 | #19 |
| Adj Y/A | 7.20 | 7.13 | +0.07 | #19 |
| Adj NY/A | 6.10 | 6.30 | -0.20 | #14 |
| Pass TD | 5 | 6.28 | -1.28 | #10 |
| TD % | 4.40 | 4.82 | -0.42 | #16 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 2.94 | +1.06 | #11 |
| Int % | 3.50 | 2.28 | +1.22 | #5 |
| Sack % | 8.10 | 6.22 | +1.88 | #8 |
| Pass Rating | 92 | 92.44 | -0.44 | #18 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -5.06 | -19.24 | +14.18 | #7 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 46 | 50.47 | -4.47 | #8 |
| 3rd Down Made | 16 | 19.81 | -3.81 | #6 |
| 4th Down Att | 2 | 5.19 | -3.19 | #3 |
| 4th Down Made | 2 | 2.81 | -0.81 | #10 |
| Red Zone Att | 5 | 13.13 | -8.13 | #1 |
| Red Zone Scores | 3 | 7.91 | -4.91 | #2 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for PIT 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — PIT 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| 50-59 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Missed FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for PIT 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — PIT 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for PIT 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — PIT 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for PIT 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — PIT 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for PIT 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — PIT 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 803 | 198 | -605 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 192 | 107 | -85 |
| Penalties | 101 | 25 | -76 |
5-Year Trajectory
PIT Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 42.2 | -47.1 | -4.9 |
| 2023 | -14.4 | 12.1 | -2.2 |
| 2024 | 11.1 | -8.4 | +2.7 |
| 2025 | 63.2 | -67.5 | -4.3 |
| 2026 | -12.4 | -2.5 | -14.9 |
Last game — Week 5, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for PIT 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | vs ATL | W | 20-13 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | @ NE | L | 3-20 | L | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs CIN | W | 30-27 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | @ CLE | L | 24-27 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | vs IND | W | 34-22 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. PIT has 5 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60.0% | 3-2 | 60.0% | +0.4 | -0.4 | 12 | +9.0 |
| Home | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | — | 2-1 | — | +7.3 | +5.3 | 12 | +9.0 |
| Away | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | — | 1-1 | — | -10.0 | -9.0 | — | -5.5 |
| As favorite | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +5.3 | +1.3 | 12 | +9.0 |
| As underdog | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -7.0 | -3.0 | 3 | +6.5 |
| Division games | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +0.0 | +0.5 | 3 | +6.5 |
| Non-division | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 1-2 | — | +0.7 | -1.0 | 12 | +9.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +4.5 | +1.8 | 12 | +9.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 0-1 | — | +7.0 | +0.5 | 7 | +0.5 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | -7.0 | -3.0 | 3 | +6.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| Oct | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Sun | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 75% |
| Turf | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
| Same conference | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 1 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | O | 3 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 1 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 1 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 2 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
| After a loss | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
| vs winning opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
| vs losing opp. | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
| Domestic road | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
| Short (<500) | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC North
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore Ravens (BAL) | 4-1 | 0.280 #32 | 29.0 | 24.0 | 45.42 | -12.02 |
| Cincinnati Bengals (CIN) | 3-2 | 0.360 #27 | 24.3 | 21.3 | 24.10 | -0.59 |
| Cleveland Browns (CLE) | 3-2 | 0.500 #16 | 20.3 | 23.8 | -3.37 | -10.72 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers (PIT) | 3-2 | 0.520 #14 | 19.3 | 21.8 | -12.43 | -2.46 |
Insights
As of week 4, how the 2026 Pittsburgh Steelers rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: defensive avg opp time to throw (2nd of 32), defensive avg opp time to throw (2nd of 32), and offensive avg yards after catch (2nd of 32). Weaknesses: defensive avg wr separation allowed (32nd of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32), and defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32).