Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 197 | 153.94 | +43.06 | #1 |
| Total Yards | 2326 | 2,223.56 | +102.44 | #13 |
| Yds / Play | 6.50 | 5.35 | +1.15 | #1 |
| 1st Downs | 143 | 132.25 | +10.75 | #11 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 8.19 | +0.81 | #20 |
| Fumbles Lost | 5 | 3.63 | +1.38 | #25 |
| EXP Pts | 90.62 | 22.12 | +68.50 | #1 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 171 | 153.94 | +17.06 | #24 |
| Total Yards | 2321 | 2,223.56 | +97.44 | #21 |
| Yds / Play | 5.60 | 5.34 | +0.26 | #24 |
| 1st Downs | 154 | 132.25 | +21.75 | #30 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 8.19 | -2.19 | #25 |
| Fumbles Lost | 3 | 3.63 | -0.63 | #20 |
| EXP Pts | -78.26 | -22.12 | -56.14 | #30 |
Scoring Composition
Where Buffalo Bills's points come from. Total = 197 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 63 | 71.16 | -8.16 | #26 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.90 | 6.00 | -0.10 | #17 |
| Yds / Drive | 36.90 | 30.97 | +5.93 | #4 |
| Points / Drive | 3.17 | 2.12 | +1.05 | #1 |
| Score % | 57.10 | 39.59 | +17.51 | #1 |
| Turnover % | 14.30 | 10.59 | +3.71 | #27 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 176 | 178.38 | -2.38 | #15 |
| Rush Yds | 893 | 746.31 | +146.69 | #5 |
| Rush Y/A | 5.10 | 4.17 | +0.93 | #2 |
| Rush TD | 14 | 6.38 | +7.63 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 31.71 | -2.85 | +34.56 | #1 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 171 | 223.28 | -52.28 | #30 |
| Pass Cmp | 114 | 143.16 | -29.16 | #29 |
| Cmp % | 66.70 | 64.09 | +2.61 | #9 |
| Pass Yds | 1433 | 1,477.25 | -44.25 | #20 |
| Yds / Att | 8.80 | 7.07 | +1.73 | #1 |
| Yds / Cmp | 13.20 | 11.03 | +2.17 | #1 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.80 | 7.06 | +1.74 | #4 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.80 | 6.21 | +1.59 | #3 |
| Pass TD | 9 | 10.22 | -1.22 | #22 |
| TD % | 5.30 | 4.57 | +0.73 | #7 |
| Pass Int | 4 | 4.71 | -0.71 | #14 |
| Int % | 2.30 | 2.12 | +0.18 | #21 |
| Sack % | 6.60 | 6.41 | +0.19 | #18 |
| Pass Rating | 102.10 | 91.61 | +10.49 | #7 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 65.95 | 30.50 | +35.45 | #5 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 63 | 86.19 | -23.19 | #32 |
| 3rd Down Made | 30 | 34.34 | -4.34 | #25 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 9.50 | -5.50 | #30 |
| 4th Down Made | 3 | 5.09 | -2.09 | #22 |
| Red Zone Att | 26 | 22.06 | +3.94 | #7 |
| Red Zone Scores | 18 | 13.09 | +4.91 | #5 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 62 | 71.16 | -9.16 | #6 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.80 | 6.01 | +0.79 | #32 |
| Yds / Drive | 37.20 | 30.98 | +6.22 | #31 |
| Points / Drive | 2.76 | 2.11 | +0.65 | #32 |
| Score % | 46.80 | 39.47 | +7.33 | #30 |
| Turnover % | 9.70 | 10.67 | -0.97 | #16 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 158 | 178.38 | -20.38 | #8 |
| Rush Yds | 606 | 746.31 | -140.31 | #7 |
| Rush Y/A | 3.80 | 4.16 | -0.36 | #9 |
| Rush TD | 6 | 6.38 | -0.38 | #20 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 5.16 | 2.85 | +2.31 | #15 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 242 | 223.28 | +18.72 | #9 |
| Pass Cmp | 157 | 143.16 | +13.84 | #26 |
| Cmp % | 64.90 | 64.15 | +0.75 | #16 |
| Pass Yds | 1715 | 1,477.25 | +237.75 | #30 |
| Yds / Att | 7.40 | 7.07 | +0.33 | #20 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.40 | 11.02 | +0.38 | #24 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.10 | 7.06 | +1.04 | #27 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.40 | 6.21 | +1.19 | #28 |
| Pass TD | 15 | 10.22 | +4.78 | #29 |
| TD % | 6.20 | 4.61 | +1.59 | #27 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 4.56 | -1.56 | #24 |
| Int % | 1.20 | 2.07 | -0.87 | #25 |
| Sack % | 4.30 | 6.28 | -1.98 | #27 |
| Pass Rating | 102.50 | 91.71 | +10.79 | #26 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -91.60 | -30.50 | -61.10 | #32 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 80 | 86.19 | -6.19 | #9 |
| 3rd Down Made | 36 | 34.34 | +1.66 | #20 |
| 4th Down Att | 9 | 9.50 | -0.50 | #16 |
| 4th Down Made | 8 | 5.09 | +2.91 | #28 |
| Red Zone Att | 26 | 22.06 | +3.94 | #26 |
| Red Zone Scores | 18 | 13.09 | +4.91 | #29 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for BUF 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — BUF 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
GWFG distances
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for BUF 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — BUF 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for BUF 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — BUF 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for BUF 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — BUF 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for BUF 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — BUF 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 848 | 439 | -409 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 298 | 71 | -227 |
| Penalties | 101 | 51 | -50 |
5-Year Trajectory
BUF Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 156.4 | 10.9 | +167.3 |
| 2023 | 167.0 | 15.2 | +182.2 |
| 2024 | 221.4 | -51.4 | +170.0 |
| 2025 | 186.8 | -33.7 | +153.1 |
| 2026 | 90.6 | -78.3 | +12.4 |
Last game — Week 8, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for BUF 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ HOU | W | 36-31 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs DET | W | 41-31 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs LAC | W | 24-16 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs NE | L | 26-29 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | @ LAR | W | 37-34 | W | — | — | — |
| 6 | @ LV | W | 33-30 | L | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | vs BAL | W | 36-10 | W | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. BUF has 7 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 7 | 6-1 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 5-2 | 71.4% | +7.4 | +3.7 | 26 | +23.0 |
| Home | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 2-2 | — | +10.2 | +4.6 | 26 | +23.0 |
| Away | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | — | 3-0 | — | +3.7 | +2.5 | 5 | +6.5 |
| As favorite | 6 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 4-2 | 66.7% | +8.2 | +3.2 | 26 | +23.0 |
| As underdog | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +3.0 | +6.5 | 3 | +6.5 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | -3.0 | -10.0 | — | -10.0 |
| Non-division | 6 | 6-0 | 5-1 | 83.3% | 4-2 | 66.7% | +9.2 | +6.0 | 26 | +23.0 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | — | 1-1 | — | +15.5 | +13.2 | 26 | +23.0 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | — | 2-0 | — | +6.5 | +1.0 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +2.5 | -4.5 | 8 | +1.0 |
| Small underdog (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +3.0 | +6.5 | 3 | +6.5 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
| HOU | Houston Texans | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +5.0 | +3.5 |
| DET | Detroit Lions | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +10.0 | +4.5 |
| LAC | Los Angeles Chargers | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +8.0 | +1.0 |
| NE | New England Patriots | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | -3.0 | -10.0 |
| LAR | Los Angeles Rams | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | +3.0 | +6.5 |
| LV | Las Vegas Raiders | 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +3.0 | -2.5 |
| BAL | Baltimore Ravens | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | +26.0 | +23.0 |
Data coverage: 2020+ (Results & Spread scraper).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
| Oct | 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33% |
| Nov | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Sun | 5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
| Mon | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 7 | 6-1 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 4 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 50% |
| Turf | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Same conference | 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Inter-conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | W | 3 |
| ATS | W | 1 |
| O/U | U | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 3 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 3 |
| Longest U streak | 1 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60% |
| After a loss | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 67% |
| vs winning opp. | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Retractable (closed) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Domestic road | 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 67% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 75% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Long (1500+) | 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 50% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 0% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| Bye+ (11+d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Bills (BUF) | 6-1 | 0.446 #23 | 32.8 | 28.5 | 90.62 | -78.26 |
| Miami Dolphins (MIA) | 1-6 | 0.645 #1 | 16.3 | 26.2 | 1.66 | -60.83 |
| New England Patriots (NE) | 5-3 | 0.563 #6 | 22.9 | 20.4 | 36.60 | -16.39 |
| New York Jets (NYJ) | 2-6 | 0.509 #16 | 19.6 | 21.4 | 10.87 | -23.34 |
Insights
As of week 7, how the 2026 Buffalo Bills rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per play (1st of 32), offensive epa per rush (1st of 32), and offensive epa per rush (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32), defensive qb pressure rate (31st of 32), and defensive epa per pass play allowed (29th of 32).