WAS at SF
What the site's algorithm makes of it
Power ratings as stored for week 6, 2026 — the set this week's picks were made from.
It makes SF the better side by 13.8.
Members see which side it is taking this week, and by how much it disagrees with the market.
Opened SF -7.5
Now SF -7.5
Line history: SF -7.5 ×23 (Oct 9–Nov 2)
Scoring offense
Percentile against the league. Outward is better; the inner ring is the median.
Scoring defense
Percentile against the league. Outward is better; the inner ring is the median.
Passing
Bubble size is touchdowns.
Rushing
Bubble size is touchdowns.
Drives
Longer is better. 50 is the league median.
Conversions
Longer is better. 50 is the league median.
Betting record — 2026
| Split | WAS | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | SU 2-4-1 · ATS 4-3 · O/U 4-3 | SU 6-1 · ATS 4-3 · O/U 3-4 |
| At home | SU 2-1-1 · ATS 2-2 · O/U 2-2 | SU 4-0 · ATS 2-2 · O/U 2-2 |
| On the road | SU 0-3 · ATS 2-1 · O/U 2-1 | SU 2-1 · ATS 2-1 · O/U 1-2 |
| As favourite | SU 1-0-1 · ATS 1-1 · O/U 1-1 | SU 4-1 · ATS 2-3 · O/U 2-3 |
| As underdog | SU 1-4 · ATS 3-2 · O/U 3-2 | SU 2-0 · ATS 2-0 · O/U 1-1 |
| In division | SU 1-2-1 · ATS 2-2 · O/U 3-1 | SU 3-0 · ATS 2-1 · O/U 2-1 |
| Out of division | SU 1-2 · ATS 2-1 · O/U 1-2 | SU 3-1 · ATS 2-2 · O/U 1-3 |
| Pick'em (±3) | SU 2-1 · ATS 2-1 · O/U 1-2 | |
| Favoured by 3-7 | SU 1-0-1 · ATS 1-1 · O/U 1-1 | |
| Favoured by 7+ | SU 3-0 · ATS 1-2 · O/U 2-1 | |
| Dog by 3-7 | SU 0-3 · ATS 1-2 · O/U 2-1 | SU 1-0 · ATS 1-0 · O/U 0-1 |
| Dog by 7+ | SU 1-1 · ATS 2-0 · O/U 1-1 |
SU = straight up · ATS = against the spread · O/U = over-under. Records count GAMES PLAYED.
Season to date — 2026
| Metric | WAS | SF |
|---|---|---|
| 1st downs | ||
| Total | 125 | 147 |
| Passing | 73 | 85 |
| Rushing | 44 | 57 |
| From penalties | 12 | 15 |
| Efficiency | ||
| Third down | 30 of 94 | 38 of 76 |
| Fourth down | 5 of 10 | 6 of 8 |
| Volume | ||
| Total yards | 2,388 | 2,640 |
| Total plays | 435 | 401 |
| Yards per play | 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Drives | 80 | 69 |
| Passing | ||
| Passing yards | 1,502 | 1,748 |
| Completions | 140-249 | 146-219 |
| Yards per pass | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Touchdowns | 11 | 15 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 4 |
| Sacks (yards lost) | 16 (98) | 7 (40) |
| Rushing | ||
| Rushing yards | 886 | 892 |
| Attempts | 192 | 191 |
| Yards per rush | 4.6 | 4.7 |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 10 |
| Red zone | ||
| Scores | 11 of 25 | 20 of 29 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties (yards) | 55 (429) | 43 (386) |
| Turnovers | ||
| Total | 3 | 8 |
| Fumbles lost | 2 | 5 |
| Interceptions thrown | 1 | 4 |
Full-season totals from the 2026 season, database N.
When these two have met
- 2026 wk 6 WAS 17, SF 23 SF won
- 2023 wk 17 SF 27, WAS 10 SF won
- 2022 wk 16 WAS 20, SF 37 SF won
- 2020 wk 14 WAS 23, SF 15 WAS won
- 2019 wk 7 SF 9, WAS 0 SF won
- 2017 wk 6 SF 24, WAS 26 WAS won
Before the game
- Biggest mismatch: SF's offense (3rd) against WAS's defense (32nd) in red-zone scoring rate.
The mismatch
- SF's offense ranks 3rd in red-zone scoring rate; WAS's defense ranks 32nd against it.
- SF's offense ranks 1st in touchdown rate per pass; WAS's defense ranks 30th against it.
- SF's offense ranks 1st in sack rate (taken); WAS's defense ranks 27th against it.
- WAS's offense ranks 6th in average drive start (yards to go); SF's defense ranks 24th against it.
- WAS's offense ranks 4th in interception rate (thrown); SF's defense ranks 21st against it.
- WAS's offense ranks 4th in share of drives ending in a turnover; SF's defense ranks 17th against it.
Form and history
- Week 6, 2026: WAS (1 win, 3 losses, 1 tie) at SF (5 wins, 0 losses), on a 5-game winning streak.
- WAS: tackles for loss 13.0 over the last four weeks, up from 10.0 — 1st to 29th in the league.
- SF: average drive start (yards to go) 194.5 over the last four weeks, up from 65.6 — 32nd to 6th in the league.
- Head-to-head: SF leads WAS 3–1 in games since 2019.
Starters and rest
- Projected starters: Jayden Daniels for WAS, Brock Purdy for SF.
Final — the recap is on this game's result page.