Scoring & Efficiency
Percentile rank per metric. Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median (rank 16/32).
| Points | 127 | 92.44 | +34.56 | #1 |
| Total Yards | 1545 | 1,329.88 | +215.13 | #8 |
| Yds / Play | 6.50 | 5.38 | +1.13 | #3 |
| 1st Downs | 95 | 79.13 | +15.88 | #5 |
| Turnovers | 7 | 4.91 | +2.09 | #25 |
| Fumbles Lost | 4 | 2.06 | +1.94 | #31 |
| EXP Pts | 58.09 | 14.06 | +44.03 | #3 |
Scoring & Efficiency Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Outward = better than league. Inner circle = median.
| Points | 107 | 92.44 | +14.56 | #25 |
| Total Yards | 1489 | 1,329.88 | +159.13 | #27 |
| Yds / Play | 5.50 | 5.39 | +0.11 | #18 |
| 1st Downs | 96 | 79.13 | +16.88 | #31 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 4.91 | +0.09 | #13 |
| Fumbles Lost | 3 | 2.06 | +0.94 | #7 |
| EXP Pts | -38.04 | -14.06 | -23.98 | #29 |
Scoring Composition
Where Buffalo Bills's points come from. Total = 127 points scored.
Offense
Drive Averages
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 43 | 42.16 | +0.84 | #16 |
| Plays / Drive | 5.70 | 5.97 | -0.27 | #22 |
| Yds / Drive | 35.90 | 30.97 | +4.93 | #8 |
| Points / Drive | 3.02 | 2.10 | +0.92 | #3 |
| Score % | 51.20 | 39.32 | +11.88 | #4 |
| Turnover % | 16.30 | 10.85 | +5.45 | #25 |
Rushing
Rushing: Y/A × Attempts × Rush TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 110 | 106.75 | +3.25 | #15 |
| Rush Yds | 556 | 445.56 | +110.44 | #5 |
| Rush Y/A | 5.10 | 4.13 | +0.97 | #3 |
| Rush TD | 10 | 3.72 | +6.28 | #1 |
| EXP Pts Rush | 20.36 | -1.75 | +22.11 | #1 |
Passing
Passing efficiency: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 119 | 131.75 | -12.75 | #20 |
| Pass Cmp | 79 | 84.69 | -5.69 | #20 |
| Cmp % | 66.40 | 64.33 | +2.07 | #13 |
| Pass Yds | 989 | 884.31 | +104.69 | #12 |
| Yds / Att | 8.70 | 7.16 | +1.54 | #3 |
| Yds / Cmp | 13.20 | 11.14 | +2.06 | #2 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.60 | 7.12 | +1.48 | #7 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.60 | 6.30 | +1.30 | #7 |
| Pass TD | 6 | 6.28 | -0.28 | #17 |
| TD % | 5 | 4.77 | +0.23 | #15 |
| Pass Int | 3 | 3.14 | -0.14 | #19 |
| Int % | 2.50 | 2.44 | +0.06 | #18 |
| Sack % | 7 | 6.50 | +0.50 | #18 |
| Pass Rating | 100.10 | 92.22 | +7.88 | #10 |
| EXP Pts Pass | 42.20 | 19.24 | +22.96 | #7 |
Team Conversions
Percentile rank per metric. Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 45 | 50.47 | -5.47 | #27 |
| 3rd Down Made | 24 | 19.81 | +4.19 | #4 |
| 4th Down Att | 4 | 5.19 | -1.19 | #21 |
| 4th Down Made | 3 | 2.81 | +0.19 | #11 |
| Red Zone Att | 16 | 13.13 | +2.88 | #5 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 7.91 | +3.09 | #6 |
Defense
Drive Averages Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| Drives | 42 | 42.16 | -0.16 | #15 |
| Plays / Drive | 6.60 | 5.96 | +0.64 | #30 |
| Yds / Drive | 35.20 | 30.95 | +4.25 | #28 |
| Points / Drive | 2.52 | 2.10 | +0.42 | #26 |
| Score % | 42.90 | 39.21 | +3.69 | #23 |
| Turnover % | 11.90 | 10.73 | +1.17 | #13 |
Rushing Defense
Rush defense: Y/A allowed × Attempts faced × Rush TDs allowed (dot size). 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Rush Att | 115 | 106.75 | +8.25 | #22 |
| Rush Yds | 464 | 445.56 | +18.44 | #19 |
| Rush Y/A | 4 | 4.17 | -0.17 | #15 |
| Rush TD | 3 | 3.72 | -0.72 | #15 |
| EXP Pts Rush | -1.67 | 1.75 | -3.42 | #20 |
Passing Defense
Pass defense: Y/A × Cmp% × Pass TDs allowed (dot size). All axes 0-100 percentile; outward + larger = better.
| Pass Att | 147 | 131.75 | +15.25 | #3 |
| Pass Cmp | 94 | 84.69 | +9.31 | #28 |
| Cmp % | 63.90 | 64.43 | -0.53 | #15 |
| Pass Yds | 1025 | 884.31 | +140.69 | #27 |
| Yds / Att | 7.50 | 7.15 | +0.35 | #20 |
| Yds / Cmp | 11.70 | 11.14 | +0.56 | #22 |
| Adj Y/A | 8.20 | 7.13 | +1.07 | #26 |
| Adj NY/A | 7.20 | 6.30 | +0.90 | #26 |
| Pass TD | 10 | 6.28 | +3.72 | #29 |
| TD % | 6.80 | 4.82 | +1.98 | #29 |
| Pass Int | 2 | 2.94 | -0.94 | #21 |
| Int % | 1.40 | 2.28 | -0.88 | #22 |
| Sack % | 6.40 | 6.22 | +0.18 | #16 |
| Pass Rating | 103.40 | 92.44 | +10.96 | #26 |
| EXP Pts Pass | -41.89 | -19.24 | -22.65 | #28 |
Team Conversions Defense
Percentile rank per metric (defense). Long bars = better than league. Median = 50.
| 3rd Down Att | 54 | 50.47 | +3.53 | #26 |
| 3rd Down Made | 22 | 19.81 | +2.19 | #25 |
| 4th Down Att | 7 | 5.19 | +1.81 | #25 |
| 4th Down Made | 6 | 2.81 | +3.19 | #31 |
| Red Zone Att | 16 | 13.13 | +2.88 | #26 |
| Red Zone Scores | 11 | 7.91 | +3.09 | #28 |
Special Teams
Kicking, returns, and punting summary for BUF 2026. Click Details for full breakdown.
Special Teams — BUF 2026
Field Goals
By distance
| Range (yd) | Made | Missed | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-19 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 20-29 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30-39 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40-49 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50-59 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 60+ | 0 | 0 | — |
Made FG distances
Point After Touchdown (PAT)
Game-Winning Field Goals
No game-winning field goal attempts this season.
Returns
Punting P
Defensive Pressure & Tackles
Pressure, tackles for loss, and forced turnover summary for BUF 2026.
Pressure & Tackles — BUF 2026
Pressure
Turnover Creation
Tackle Detail
EPA & Efficiency
Expected Points Added and CPOE for BUF 2026. Higher = better.
EPA & Efficiency — BUF 2026
Passing
Rushing
Receiving
About these stats
EPA = Expected Points Added — a play-by-play measure of value over baseline. Positive EPA = above average; negative = below.
CPOE = Completion Percentage Over Expected — completion rate above what a typical QB would post given the same pass distribution.
Air Yards & YAC
Pass distance breakdown for BUF 2026 — air yards (downfield) vs yards after catch.
Air Yards & YAC — BUF 2026
Passing decomposition
Receiving decomposition
About
Air Yards = the distance a pass traveled through the air (catch point minus line of scrimmage). YAC = yards after catch (catch point to where the play ended). Together they decompose total pass yardage into "downfield throws" vs "yards earned after the catch".
Discipline
Penalty totals and per-game rate for BUF 2026. Lower = better; rank pills are inverted (#1 = least penalized).
Discipline — BUF 2026
Season totals
Per game
About these ranks
Lower is better. The rank pill on each tile inverts the usual convention — #1 = league's most disciplined team, #32 = most penalized.
Top 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks best in the league.
Top-ranked metrics sorted by rank strength. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's strengths.
Bottom 10 Ranks
Where this team ranks worst in the league.
Worst-ranked metrics sorted by severity. The curve shows cumulative share — where it bends reveals the 80/20 of this team's weaknesses.
Most Improved YoY
Biggest offensive gains 2026 vs 2025.
| Penalties Yds | 848 | 250 | -598 |
| Pass Sacked Yds | 298 | 50 | -248 |
| Penalties | 101 | 30 | -71 |
5-Year Trajectory
BUF Off EXP, Def EXP, and Net EXP from 2022 through 2026. Trending up, down, or holding steady?
| 2022 | 156.4 | 10.9 | +167.3 |
| 2023 | 167.0 | 15.2 | +182.2 |
| 2024 | 221.4 | -51.4 | +170.0 |
| 2025 | 186.8 | -33.7 | +153.1 |
| 2026 | 58.1 | -38.0 | +20.1 |
Last game — Week 4, 2026
Passing Profile
Team-aggregate passing-game stats for BUF 2026.
Weekly Results
Per-week results, scores, and ATS outcome. See the Weekly Results candlestick below for visual season trajectory.
| 1 | @ HOU | W | 36-31 | W | — | — | — |
| 2 | vs DET | W | 41-31 | W | — | — | — |
| 3 | vs LAC | W | 24-16 | W | — | — | — |
| 4 | vs NE | L | 26-29 | L | — | — | — |
| 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Weekly Results vs Vegas
Each candle = one game. Open = Vegas predicted margin; close = actual margin. Green: team beat the spread. Red: didn't.
Betting Profile
ATS / SU / O/U splits by situation. BUF has 4 graded games this season. Situations with fewer than 5 games show a dash for the percentage to avoid small-sample noise.
W / L / Push composition per situation, each row normalized to 100% of graded games in that bucket.
| Overall | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 3-1 | — | +5.0 | -0.2 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Home | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | — | 2-1 | — | +5.0 | -1.5 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Away | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +5.0 | +3.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| As favorite | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | — | 3-1 | — | +5.0 | -0.2 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Division games | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | — | 1-0 | — | -3.0 | -10.0 | — | -10.0 |
| Non-division | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | — | 2-1 | — | +7.7 | +3.0 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Pick-em (≤3) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +5.0 | +3.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| Small favorite (3-7) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | — | 1-0 | — | +10.0 | +4.5 | 10 | +4.5 |
| Large favorite (7+) | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | — | 1-1 | — | +2.5 | -4.5 | 8 | +1.0 |
Head-to-Head
Opponents faced in 2026. Avg MoV = mean margin of victory; Avg Cover = mean margin of cover (positive = team covered).
Schedule Context
Performance sliced by when, where, and against whom.
By month
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 100% |
| Oct | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
By day of week
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Sun | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By season half
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First half (W1-9) | 4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 75% |
By surface
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Turf | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By site role
By group
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same division | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Same conference | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 100% |
| Inter-conference | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
Weather
Weather data not yet available for this season.
Data coverage: 2015 onward.
Streaks & Trends
Current run, season records, and performance after specific game outcomes.
Current streaks
| Dimension | Streak | Length |
|---|---|---|
| SU | L | 1 |
| ATS | L | 1 |
| O/U | O | 1 |
Longest this season
| Dimension | Length |
|---|---|
| Longest SU win streak | 3 |
| Longest SU loss streak | 1 |
| Longest ATS cover | 3 |
| Longest ATS no-cover | 1 |
| Longest O streak | 2 |
| Longest U streak | 1 |
Performance context
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After a win | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| On 2+ winning streak | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
| vs winning opp. | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| vs losing opp. | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50% |
Travel & Venue Context
Physical context — where games were played, how far the team traveled, and how much rest they had.
By environment
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
By venue type
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic home | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Domestic road | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By travel distance
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home (0 mi) | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 67% |
| Medium (500-1500) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
By rest days
| Bucket | G | SU | ATS | O/U | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short week (3-4d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 100% |
| Standard (5-7d) | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0% |
| Long week (8-10d) | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 100% |
Betting Profile Heatmap
ATS performance across every context. Color = ATS%; opacity = sample size.
Spread-Role Performance
ATS% by pre-game spread role. Tells you which roles this team handles well or folds in.
Vegas Accuracy
Vegas closing spread vs actual margin. MAE = average miss in pts; Bias = whether Vegas systematically over- or under-rated the team.
Stat trajectory
Multi-year history with league average. Pick a stat to compare.
Division Comparison: AFC East
This team and its three division rivals, side by side.
Division rivals across core KPIs. SoS is multiplied by 100 to share an axis with per-game points.
| Team | Record | SoS | Pts/G | Pts Allowed/G | Off EXP | Def EXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Bills (BUF) | 3-1 | 0.350 #29 | 31.8 | 26.8 | 58.09 | -38.04 |
| Miami Dolphins (MIA) | 0-5 | 0.840 #1 | 11.5 | 25.3 | -16.64 | -35.41 |
| New England Patriots (NE) | 3-2 | 0.670 #4 | 16.3 | 19.3 | -7.96 | -0.42 |
| New York Jets (NYJ) | 2-3 | 0.480 #19 | 19.0 | 21.0 | 6.01 | -20.86 |
Insights
As of week 4, how the 2026 Buffalo Bills rank among the league's 32 teams in efficiency: Strengths: offensive epa per rush (1st of 32), offensive epa per rush (1st of 32), and defensive stuffed rate forced (1st of 32). Weaknesses: defensive epa per play allowed (28th of 32), defensive yards after contact per carry allowed (28th of 32), and defensive epa per pass play allowed (26th of 32).